Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

Публикация

The thing that keeps getting me about all the pieces fretting about Bluesky being too insular is that the argument seems to be that those of us who are most likely to be abused by the right (BIPOC people, trans people, queer people, etc) must put up with being abused for the sake of public discourse

Обсуждение

177 прямых ответов · 293 сообщений

Показаны не все ответы

Публичный счётчик показывает 190, а источник передал 177. Остальные ответы могли быть удалены, скрыты или не выданы публично.

We’re not actually supposed to gain anything from it. We’re supposed to share our perspective as a lesson to the right, or something. And never forget that they think we’re freaks? I guess??

Ответ для Louisa

so much bullshit.

Ответ для Louisa

Maybe? or are we supposed to be brought to our senses by discoursing with the right? The argument always seems to ignore rampant abuse and hate speech

Публикация скрыта фильтром безопасности.
Ответ для sirosenbaum

I really don’t believe there is even the tiniest desire to persuade tbh.

Ответ для I Don’t Want No Scabs

oh of course not, but I think some centrists have some kind of fantasy that ... IDK, exposing ourselves to hate speech with cure us of "gender ideology"? something something

Ответ для sirosenbaum

I see what you’re saying but I do not think they have the slightest desire to even cure, whatever they mean by that. They want us to *comply*. They can dress it up however but it’s not really deeper than that, in this context and most contexts.

Ответ для I Don’t Want No Scabs

yes, that.

Ответ для sirosenbaum

lol I blocked so many new accounts today without engaging, and I think I’ll take a break from online for a minute before I start posting through it.

Ответ для I Don’t Want No Scabs

Oh sorry you refer to the centrists so I’d respond slightly differently: they also want us to comply so that they can continue not doing anything about fascist abuse while pretending it’s for our own good

Ответ для I Don’t Want No Scabs

Or at least make us miserable enough that we can be held up as examples to keep their kids/grandkids from coming out.

Ответ для sirosenbaum

The only reason they want to talk to us is so they can ridicule and dominate the conversation.

Ответ для Louisa

Exactly. 1 of the most important, & hardest lessons I learned was to stop volunteering for abuse. I kept thinking I could change the abuser because I was objectively in the right. Eventually I learned that doesn't matter to abusers. And my life is worthy & it was up to me to leave & save myself.

Ответ для Mickeyfoon

This. I’m not the person to convert a right-wing propaganda sponge, so all I can do is live my life in a way that supports my own communities and remove the rest from my sphere of influence.

Ответ для Mickeyfoon

As a person who left an abusive battering spouse, the space is very important. Just getting a space where the abuse/battery does not happen is an important first step. This place is so much less about the dunks- much more about actual dialog. All it takes is a bit of civility.

Ответ для Louisa

like we're supposed to believe they really want some other perspective? Does not make sense. I don't see how anyone paying attention would think that's a genuine goal of "discourse"

Ответ для Louisa

I’m very tired tonight

Ответ для Louisa

Yeah, something like that. 🙄 The tolerance paradox extends to public discourse being conducted in good faith. When people break the contract they no longer necessarily deserve to be included in the conversation.

Ответ для Louisa

Twitter = “stop hitting yourself”

Ответ для Louisa

I think it's must that, in the "natural" (white supremacist) way of things, we are obligated to suffer their point of view (abuse) while being respectfully quiet, if not downright grateful.

Ответ для azteclady

*more, not must

Ответ для azteclady

This. *gasp* We'll become wholly disconnected from the right and never understand what's driving them to vote for Trump and his ilk. But we understand just fine.

Ответ для Louisa

I used to refer to myself as a Social Justice Paladin specifically because, as a formerly bullied cis white man, I had the privilege and thick skin and patience to try to educate those dorks. It's not something we should be asking of people in general, because it is hard and mostly useless work.

Ответ для ArchangelZeriel

Exactly, it's not their clowns, it's not their circus.

Ответ для ArchangelZeriel

Agreed. It takes a lot of patience, social skill, and training to change the minds of fascists, and it's not always possible. I don't think anyone should have to do it involuntarily, but especially not oppressed people for whom those interactions are dangerous.

Ответ для Louisa

This is total sanity. Following you for more. Thank you.

Ответ для Louisa

A lesson I learned from the Yo, is This Racist? podcast is that it is not the job of minorities to instruct ignorant white people.

Ответ для Louisa
Ответ для Our Lady of Perpetual Disappointment

Realized some people won’t know what a whipping boy was literally before it was an idiom.

Ответ для Our Lady of Perpetual Disappointment

It’s Bluesky. It could mean something else that I don’t know about. Just want to be clear which kind I was talking about.

Ответ для Louisa

A dunk tank is no fun for the bullies throwing things at the target if there's no one they hate sitting on the seat

Ответ для Louisa

They all act like there’s some Trump voter out there who was like “I’m just really interested in the intricacies of his brilliant tax and trade policy proposals” and fuck, there fucking isn’t. They want us to suffer and die, in that order, and they expect he will live up to his promises to do so

Ответ для Louisa

yeah we owe it to them or whatever a lot of words to describe white cishet fomo

Let me guess: most of the thinkpieces are written by white men under the age of 50. Everyone else has learned the value of protecting our peace. They’re the last ones screaming, “Debate me! DEBATE ME, DAMMIT!”

Ответ для Rebekah is Pro-Choice

Pretty much. And it turns out, they’re the ones we’re all protecting peace from.

Ответ для Rebekah is Pro-Choice

Many of them are over 50 too. Also, while most of them are men, there are quite a few women riding that gravy train - Pamela Paul, Bari Weiss, Phoebe Maltz Bovy, and the entire TERF industrial complex.

Time was spent trying to educate the Republican Trash Heap supporters but they were a forgone cult. WE TRIED! We don’t agree 100% on everything, so many options. We are not in an echo chamber. It is a respect chamber & can educate each other. So grateful for all I learned the last 5 months.

You shouldn't have to put up with it. And straight white dudes like me who value our friends and family shouldn't have to put up with seeing those we care about get abused just because they're slightly different.

In addition, we aren't nearly as insular as they claim. We represent a diverse group of folks who are united by a quite reasonable distrust of Donald, his billionaire friends, and their fascist cronies. We have a big umbrella indeed but it still does not encompass their ilk nor will it ever.

Well, how can they gaslight us if we pull away from them? Like right now there is a concerted effort to divide us, instead of pointing the finger at the true culprit. Greedy tax dodgers like Elon Musk.

It’s a parallel with the claim, “Dems lost for being too woke.” “Bluesky is limited by woke.” It’s all such infuriating, feckless bullshit.

Ответ для 8647Russ

"Wanting to have pleasant discourse, maybe learning something, or just sharing a moment, instead of being called names? That's gay AF."

Ответ для charlottebanks

No, YOU’RE gay!

The thing is that “public discourse” implies that there is respectful dialogue or principled debate. These fascists have no respect for anyone nor are they principled in any way.

Sometimes when you feel like those you interact with IRL seem not to get the way you think, it's vital to find communities online that can reassure you that it is not just you. That way thinking develops rather than dies.

right?! there's plenty of diversity of thought here. but I'm not being threatened with rape and death for expressing my opinions.

And the abuse is the point of what they think is discourse. Faahhhk that. Let's defend the skyline.

Ответ для C'est Beau En Tabarnak

There's a reason they're coming here and getting butthurt: they miss shitting on us over at the bad place and have learned it's not so easy to pull that shit here. Amen.

Ответ для C'est Beau En Tabarnak

Vous etes Quebecoise? Chalice

Ответ для Chomsky's Giga Chad

Calice. Pas de 'h'.

Ответ для Dave Conrad

Câlisse

Ответ для CreativeMaus

Ah, ouais, différence en orthographié France / Québec :)

Ответ для Dave Conrad

Hahahaha, je me demandais si c'était le cas. En plus, je suis Québécoise anglophone alors je ne suis jamais certaine si c'est mon québécois ou mon mal compréhension de français qui me fuck 😅

Ответ для CreativeMaus

I'm never sure either. I don't know what my first language was. But I do know if you don't use it, you lose it. It took me a few days in Paris to fully get my footing. AND THEN they wanted to know where I'm from because the combination of Québecois at home and Parisien French at school....

Ответ для C'est Beau En Tabarnak

I'm from way upstate NY and Montreal had the prettiest girls and one in particular for about a year. Lol

Ответ для Chomsky's Giga Chad

Maine. Lewiston, Maine.

Ответ для Chomsky's Giga Chad

Apparently we're known for pretty women? I dunno. Maybe growing up here you don't have perspective on it?

Ответ для C'est Beau En Tabarnak

Hahaha. Oh man, I can only imagine. I'm sorry for all the headaches you must have endured 😆

Ответ для C'est Beau En Tabarnak

I miss France the country feel of Marseille the lights and bustle of Paris. Merdes.

Ответ для Chomsky's Giga Chad
Ответ для C'est Beau En Tabarnak

D'accord tres bien bienvenue

Ответ для C'est Beau En Tabarnak

I think the point is they need someone to hate and abuse. If people leave, they have no one to bully.

Fuck 'em all. And remember how often a body of water was all that saved people from being invaded, enslaved and worse. I say let's not only be insular but also equip the beaches with mines and barbed wire.

Except we don't, right? We don't have to subjected to that abuse, now. They can all eat a bag of dicks.

Don't overthink it, just block racist, sexist, homophobic fucks.

How else are the RWers supposed to get their FrEE sPeEcH?

Social capital is awesome if you have tons of it to throw around.

Frustrating. Perhaps we're interested in world events and things beyond our own or others' sexuality. It's a necessity to know what potential abusers might do, it's a pleasure to take in the outside world. We're actually not insular by nature like some are.

I don’t understand the persistence of this whole argument. If people don’t like Bluesky, for any reason, they don’t have to be on it, same for the tweeters.

We all need a place to surround ourselves with positive energy. Yeah that's a good thing. But if I don't make an effort to daily fight back the echo chamber of lies, then who will. There has to be a point where we make a stand and call them out for their deplorable behavior. TS is the trenches.

What irritates me about the whole "echo chamber" thing is that most of us just want to use social media to be social, to interact with similarly minded friendly folks. No one owes anyone any level of interaction on here (or anywhere!)

Exposure to the “both sides” argument is truth vs lies. I pay attention to the President and Congress. I know what reality is. @facebook.bsky.social and X offer consumers nothing but lies. I’ll pass.

But being insular is like choosing the bear, apparently...

A generalisation... In their logic, they have the right to abuse and you have the right to be abused. They see this as "freedom" as long as it is one way abuse. They see money as the important thing but most of us here see morals as the important thing. That's a core difference in my opinion.

It also puts the starting point (and sort of blame) at us leaving twitter, and not the abusive things abusive people have said and done. Being a nazi creates an echo chamber, because only Nazis will talk to you.

This American Life episode called Thos is theCake We Baked, and in it there's a bit with a woman who has been on the press circuit for her horrific pregnancy / refused healthcare story. We deserve a respite from the fights we endure. We deserve social connections that give us hope. No guilt.

It's the attack philosophy of bullies intended to undermine the strength of the opposition. No one should put up with abuse and a platform that properly administers users will ensure it doesn't happen.

I mean...That's the whole reason they're trying to spin that story right? They're pissed off that they can't be verbally abusive to as many people anymore. Now they can only eat themselves. Ouroboros, but certainly not as eternal.

it also pisses me off bc there’s this assumption that social media should be all about politics and having conversations. i’m willing to engage, but i’m mostly here to look at pretty art- in which case a well curated feed, an “echo chamber”, is actually a good thing

Also, we all know what they are saying anyway 😖

i'm tired of the stupid from the donnie cult. i can't listen to a word they say because it makes my brain hurt.

Well said

Nope we, especially you,get to have this safe space. The difference between us and Truth Social and the crap show that used to be Twitter is that we traffic in truth and facts. What's the upside to letting them corrupt this one? They can GFT

And, I keep thinking about the fact that vile political views are not really diverse. It’s not an echo chamber in here or among my friends I see in person. We all have different types of jobs and interests that keep a wide range of conversations going for way longer than some false political binary.

Reminds me of the cartoon where one shape is told it doesn't belong, so it goes off with a few others into a small space of their own. When the main group finds them, it says they're being excluded and crowds in, then says the ones who had been there don't belong.

Ответ для Avrila, dodging COVID round 2
Ответ для Sean Hoyer

📌

The dumbs twist the 1A to suggest "You must listen to me because free speech." No. No we don't. Shout it from your rooftop, IDGAF. But I refuse to entertain racism, misogyny and bigotry. We do not owe anyone our attention when they are spewing hate.

Nothing wrong with Twitter, Facebook, and other online spaces becoming insular spaces for right wing bootlickers, but when the left does it, it's bad

all mainstream press & sm is currently a delivery system for their sadism & threats but it's no fun if the intended targets stop participating...and that's when they start crying about discourse. it's all bullshit.

True. Also, we’ve generally agreed that the other side is a cult and there’s no point in engaging. Block and move on.

Or pretending that what happens there is debate. With rare exception it’s not!

Currently capitalism gives us freedom to choose whatever option pleases us most. Why would you choose to be some ignoramus’s verbal punching bag?

It's okay to be insular if the other side is offering nothing but drivel.

Had a conversation with a neighbor who said he was glad M bought Twitter because he permitted free speech. He clearly doesn't understand "free speech" contains the US govt, not the population. Nice guy, but headdesk

The people writing those articles are under some kind of delusion that Twitter isn’t totally dominated by right wing trolls that have made using it practically impossible. The day after the election, white supremacist Nick Fuentes got “your body my choice” on the top of the trending tab

Yeah it feels very SSDD for me, oh you want the right to call disabled people names and threaten visible minorities with death camps and are mad that's bad behavior? Right-o, it's literally every space on the internet too big to have a single moderator.

Don't listen. It's bullshit. We don't have to have "public discourse" if we don't fucking want to! They can rip themselves apart if they need to be assholes. I refuse to be their doormat.

Also, social media owners don't even care about public discourse. They care about people fighting so the site is more active and people see more ads.

Hey, it’s not FreeSpeech™ if the asshats don’t get to scream at and insult and make bad-faith arguments at people they don’t like.

Ridiculous. We don’t want or need to hear even more from those people, we know where to find them if we want that.

True. The reason for exodus and boycott is happening is that a once popular social media site chose to silence ordinary humane social interaction to favour the voices of trolls, cynics and thugs. Let them all scream into the void including the journalists who argue their cause.

As far as I know, nobody's keeping right-wingers from joining Bluesky as long as they don't insult people.

Ответ для G. Smith

They can only go so long before they have to spew their disease-ridden bilge water at others. So yes, they can join, but either they won't last long and leave in a huff, or just get blocked and be left to talk to themselves.

Well said. I agree if you throw all females. Even the daft ones who voted for 'em.

Yes, because they need to be able to hurt us constantly, or feel that they're doing so. Maybe they'll start eating one another...

"It's hurtful when you don't stick around to be attacked and deliberately baited into ridiculous circular arguments. You think you can just leave? Did Thomas Jefferson "just leave"??" I mean if they had anything of interest to say, instead of acting out their hatred & emptiness over & over & over

I told Mark Cuban that exact thing when he did the "shouldn't you want to hear opposing views" schtick. Those fuckers already own every megaphone, we already know their shit encrusted minds thanks, they always denigrate us and NEVER HEAR US.

Ответ для That Old Broadbean

They don't have "views" they can articulate. Instead they have firehouses of hatred that they point at people who don't agree that we should refer to migrants as vermin, or trans people as people, or that they should provide answers when we ask about the gay agenda and who writes that newsletter

Ответ для charlottebanks

See? we already know their entire deck of possible responses. We dont need to hear from them any more;)

Ответ для That Old Broadbean

BINGO

Ответ для That Old Broadbean

There isn't any reason to engage with people that are not engaging with you. Trolling, memeing, canned 6 word replies and worse isn't engagement, but that describes 99 percent of the right wing posts on twitter.

Ответ для That Old Broadbean

Yes! They ARE the ones whose views have been bellowed, screeched, shrieked, and squawked from the rooftops FOR YEARS. We know their minds. There hasn't been anything new except the faces spouting those views.

Ответ для That Old Broadbean

We hear opposing views everywhere else, every day, every time we step out the door.

Let them abuse each other. I think it's called a circle of jerks.

There's a time and a place for listening to both sides of an argument. That hellsite promoting literal Nazis, bigots, and fascist bootlickers is not it. For some arguments, there is no "other side" worth hearing out. I'll make liberal use of my functioning block button on this site, tyvm.

Haven't you heard? In mainstream discourse, impartial mustn't mean impartial anymore. metro.co.uk/2020/10/30/b...

BBC's new 'no bias' rule creates confusion over LGBT Pride paradesThe rules are in place in order to reinforce the BBC's status as an impartial organisation.metro.co.uk

Exactly. Free speech increasingly seems to be something that only exists if it’s within the parameters of what racists facists and bigots demand the rest of us hear and which excludes what the rest of us think.

I don’t understand the argument. How is T*****r supposed to have fixed this. Like Bsky, you choose who your feeds should be filled with. That, by definition, is how you make an echo chamber. What the other site does to supposedly fix this is implicitly to add what it thinks you should also be 1/2

Ответ для Shane

Seeing so in effect you are subjected to Space Karen’s echo chamber too… no thanks. I quite like it here.

That's peak toxicity: "you're wrong to want to get away from me, you should let me keep on harassing you and making you feel miserable ! You're impeding on my rights to make you feel really bad !!" That's the "right" they feel deprived from...

And what discourse, of course? Those other places everyone but the far right and trolls gets drowned out to begin with. That's not even what 'discourse' is when no communication is allowed.

It also assumed that everyone that isn’t on the right is not the public.

Ответ для Just Mel

Yup.

oop 🙃

Nailed it!

Like with everything now, whatever a person say who voted for a convicted felon, adjudicated rapist hold no weight.

Ответ для Nonna

***says

Think of the trolls! But seriously, it’s like they don’t understand that the best shitposters are all we need to balance things out, and they are *not* on the right.

They can all stay on X and abuse each other

There does seem to be a very entitled 'You're OUR punching bag, not the other way around' mentality to the discourse of bsky & 'free speech.' But bigots always believe that they are the gate keepers

I’m done with there’s two sides, let the other side speak…there’s right or wrong, good or bad, justice or injustice, tolerance or intolerance…we are too much everyone gets a trophy whether you win or loose! It needs to stop!

It’s much easier to just flush the MAGA turds.

They hate losing their targets

Yes, yes, too insular, that must be why it is picking up tens of millions of users.

Abusers need a victim. Narcissistic sadistic goblins need their supply. They’ve been hating on us for so long and telling us to go away but they didn’t mean it. Us not being around to continue feeding them is a punishment worse than - anything. 😁 Frankly brings a smile to my face.

If you accept their assertion that we’re all “wrong”, then clearly it’s their responsibility to lecture and abuse us into right thought, and our responsibility to sit there and take it. Obviously. (sarcastic)

Fuck them. This is our safe, peaceful place and it’s killing them because we can ignore (block) them. 😁

It's also telling that joining Bluesky supposedly "insulates" us from conservative voices, according to this framing. There's no ban on conservatives joining Bluesky. From what I've seen so far, people just can't heap slurs on others or threaten violence. Connect the dots if you will.

Absolutely. Another piece to this that I mentioned somewhere else is that the right doesn't want to be in their own echo chamber because they're afraid of schisms within their own party if they actually start talking to each other instead of fighting the "other".

I say “🖕🏻” to “ all the pieces”. Love it here.

These are the people who object to any kind of moderation. I'm still skeptical about Bluesky, but for other reasons, namely its VC background and its continued failure to make followers and follows portable, as they are on Mastodon.

thats not public discourse.....no one deserves abuse just for who they are.

Never let them abuse you. Don't let them get away with it.

see it as a resting place Louisa, for the time being, and like George commented am place to form and plot resistance sis! love aussie auntee!

It goes both ways. I remain on Twitter so I can persecute Nazis and expose poopaganda.

I know we talk about resisting/rebelling, but it's also valid to just not want to be a target. Harm and risk minimisation is something that girls are taught at a very young age; it's more than reasonable to leave a situation where you're not feeling safe.

That’s exactly how I feel. No. I’m done.

Yes, my existence is not a “debate” I’m a whole ass human and I have the agency to determine what I will expose myself to or put up with. I’m still on Twitter and FB But Yanno if I wanna chill on BlueSky, I don’t owe it to anyone to “debate” them I don’t debate Nazis I may d*xx them tho

I blocked a Nazi Swastika here yesterday, and an Alex Jones fan today. I’m getting ready to delete that Hellsite I only stayed on to push against that Sociopath Owner.

And it seems people think there is something inherently bad about a social, public space where marginalized folks feel safe. "But what if they continue to feel good? What then?" seems to be the line of thinking.

this... like, if we're not fighting with imbeciles, or serving ourselves up for abuse, something is wrong. Nothing is wrong. Do not adjust your dial. Something something they can cry more.

📌

As I’ve told people. If you don’t like it here then don’t join. No one is forcing you. And no one here cares. It like they think “oh no we have to join and let them know we don’t like there opinions”.

Agreed. They *want* the right to be bullies. Pfui.

It is a bad faith argument that they don’t apply to Truth Social, Fox News, or any number of other one-sided outlets.

Ответ для Doubtful Guest

It might also be alarming or boring that not every single thing is viewed through a lens of "sides." I like learning. It's fun to come across people who love something & want to tell us about it. it doesn't have to involve libtards or your body my choice or any other pwns. They're lost there

Their vibe is Why won’t you stand still so I can hit you

💥💥💥💥💥 Say it!

If I shared this on Facebook, would you prefer it be with attribution for credit, or w/o for privacy?

How did these people cope before social media? The self proclaimed free speech lobby seem to believe that not only are they entitled to their opinion (which they are) but other people are obliged to listen to them (which they're not).

The only way in which social media is like the public square is that the marginalized and outsiders can't take a stroll around it without being in constant fear of being attacked. Fuck the public square.

I hate this on your behalf! And it's abuse for abuse's sake. There's no new information in the right-wing echo chamber. I've already noted that they consider me a pedophile, communist snowflake, even if I'm not directly targeted. Noted.

Remember how in school, a deeply disruptive kid is sent home because their chaos means no one else can learn? Same in adulthood. Note that the disruptive kid will probably respond to a compassionate, insightfully targeted intervention when it's made available.

How can they do performative outrage theater without someone to be performatively outraged at? You're so cruel to deny them content! /s

It's a truly privileged position to think that 'arguing' with bigots on the Internet (more often they intentionally seek you out and harass you) is just a very uncivil argument. Maybe they'll be a bit mean. That you won't be harassed endlessly, doxxed, outed to your family etc.

Ответ для crombula

And that *because* it's just oh so safe and uneventful for you, that it's some kind of civic duty to expose yourself to transphobia, to caricatures of your suicide, to racism, to sexual harassment, to people who will gleefully ruin your life. That you need to make yourself visible for them.

Not just put up with abuse but respond to it in a calm and rational and polite manner, or else the attackers will get worse.

bsky.app/profile/caia...

Caias Ward

There is a segment of the population who never: -had any real impositions -learned that you aren't entitled to someone's time -learned that just because you say it doesn't make it worthy of consideration -been taught to mind their own fucking business And they get Big Mad when told any of it now.

I didn't use Twitter for politics, but I did leave it because of the growing toxic atmosphere that invaded my feed regularly. It's a relief the science and philosophy people I followed are finally doing the same and coming to Bluesky.

They don't believe in public discourse. Why should we?

Bingo, you are spot on. Eff them. . Thanks for being here. 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️

They have no right to an audience.

And by extension to that point, I've seen YouTube try to recommend videos trying to dunk on Blue Sky by channels like Sargan of Akkad & Clownfish TV due to that kind of thing. Like, seriously, did you not get the hint with Blue Sky earlier? Get the fuck out of here with that bullshit, you fools! 😐

As if abuse was in any way discourse.

Thank you for stating so clearly what I’ve been unable to articulate. Why do I want to go where I know people will scream at me?

I’ve had enough racial trauma. I’m cool being cozy.

The world is so fucked right now, i think it does everyone good to just chat with like minded people. Social media isn't essential, it's a hobby, it shouldn't come with abuse and bullying as standard. 😔

😹🤣💯

There’s also an underlying belief that this debate is somehow productive. I’m not sure anyone’s mind gets changed. I wonder if it makes people feel like they are in action without having done anything. Perhaps that is the right’s intention?

None of us are under any obligation to just sit back & take verbal abuse. If someone is being a d*ck, cut them off.

It’s really deep when framed up that way (i.e., properly).

Perfectly said.

Word!!!!

I don't hang out with bigots, bullies and racists irl. Bigots, bullies and racists complaining will not change my mind to accepting abuse. END OF TOPIC FOREVER

Yeah it's not about broadening "our" Echo chamber. The whole narrative and discourse is about enforcing THEIRS.

I actually don't think that's it. I think certain privileged white people are angry that others of their ilk prefer spaces that include us than in spaces that have run us out. They see it as a betrayal that our voices would be valued by people who they feel ought to sensibly abandon us to our fate.

Ответ для Evan Urquhart

there's something to this as well, yeah. it's offensive to them to be considered less important to someone's social media experience than the marginalized and disregarded

Ответ для KLM

An insight I had a while back was that I am not part of the "we" for people who say "we" to reach across political disagreements. The person saying this doesn't see me as a party to the conversation, they see me as an object of unpleasant, unnecessary division.

Ответ для Evan Urquhart

as i just said in another thread, they see us as "the trans issue" not as people

Ответ для KLM

there's a scene in the latest season of Heartstopper where one of the characters articulates *exactly this* ... "we're not a *debate*, we're human beings" I have been thinking about that sentence every day since I watched that scene

Ответ для Evan Urquhart

Who was it who said, "If you aren't at the table, you are on the menu"?

Ответ для Evan Urquhart

the “discussed” not the “discussers”

Ответ для Evan Urquhart

I think that’s certainly also part of it!

Ответ для Evan Urquhart
Ответ для The Creatively Maladjusted
Ответ для Evan Urquhart

Also, they want to own and control "the conversation." Who can show up. Who can play. Who gets respect. Who gets ridiculed. The success of Bluesky means they are not able to control other peoples' conversations. At least, right now.

Ответ для KC Momkin

Watch out for the "well-meaning" people letting them in to "debate" (🤦‍♀️). Like I said the other day about cockroaches. You see one, there are a hundred more in the walls, waiting to follow. Then Bluesky is just X, Part 2.

Ответ для Evan Urquhart

Alternatively: “They see it as a betrayal that our voices would be valued by people who they feel ought to place all value on their voices.”

Ответ для Superstar Whistle

💯

Ответ для Evan Urquhart
Ответ для Evan Urquhart

👆

Ответ для Evan Urquhart

Oh, absolutely agreed. I'd much rather be in this space than any space with them.

Ответ для Evan Urquhart

It's one and the same. Who do you think these assholes are talking to, if not people they see as like themselves, only "lost" to a crowd they see as not-people, whose influence can only *contaminate them*? They are assholes to marginalized people, & think it's an object lesson to wayward whites.

Ответ для Evan Urquhart
Ответ для Evan Urquhart

Just speaking for myself, since Cletus and Chad weren’t particularly kind to me growing up and beyond, I don’t feel any solidarity with them whatsoever. I’ll hang out here and elsewhere with cool, intelligent people rather than base my associations on melanin skin content or ancestral birthplace.

Ответ для Evan Urquhart

Just finished Caste by Isabel Wilkerson and this resonated. The dominant caste doesn’t like disruption of the caste system. Lower caste folk (Black people, trans people, the disabled) are supposed to recognize their inferiority, and act accordingly. Upper caste are supposed to stick together.

Ответ для Evan Urquhart

I've had that thought, and it certainly may be the case, but (and this isn't necessarily disputing you) as one of those thoroughly non-marginalized people, I never hear about this from them. They never complain to or about me, only about you.

Ответ для Evan Urquhart
Ответ для Evan Urquhart

You know...that's something I didn't think of before. And it would tie in nicely with that "replacement theory" that's been part of white supremacist ideology for a while. "Why are you giving...those people your time and energy? You're supposed to only be MY supply!"

Yeah, they come up with whatever excuses they can - both to continue abusing people, and to continue adding to the muskrat's wealth. Fuck 'em. Life is too sweet to pay any mind to such poison.

a woman with a bandana on her head is smiling and says aint nobody got time for thatALT: a woman with a bandana on her head is smiling and says aint nobody got time for thatmedia.tenor.com

I got swarmed by some cis people and just stopped being part of the conversation. It was so nice. I don't owe them a harassment target

The “progressive echo chamber fleeing X” narratives are bizarre. Most of us didn’t join X—we joined Twitter. Then new management rebranded & made a truly terrible product, so people chose something different. That’s literally the free market. Isn’t capitalism supposed to be their thing?

This.

As if empathy, open-mindedness, and fairness are something to be ridiculed and mocked. They would rather people continue to justify their existence on an ever sliding scale instead of scooting over and making room.

Nope. Keep em out. I don’t go to parties in crack dens. I spend time with people I like, and who like me - nothing wrong with that.

I don't know what is gained from suffering that abuse. Is any RW opinion these days surprising or informative? Sure, it might be surprising how depraved people can be, but I don't see there's anything to learn from a vile POV

Your people are safe at my account 🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈

The right just doesn’t get the concept of “Mind your own damn business!”

I guess people are on #Bluesky for different reasons. Some people are seeking a safe space. For me it wasn't so much the abuse/imbecility level on Twitter. It was the fact that I didn't trust the owner not to manipulate the site and use it as his personal political weapon at opportune times.

Ответ для JoeA

I’m not “seeking a safe space” so much as I am looking for a place where I can shoot the shit with my friends without getting called a groomer every 30 seconds, or getting rape threats in my DMs

Ответ для Louisa

Fair enough. Though that sounds a lot like what I meant with 'seeking a safe space'.

Ответ для Louisa

I’m sorry that’s terrible getting threats like that. WTF is wrong with some people?

Ответ для JoeA

He was definitely going to do that.

Ответ для Jaycee

Musk bought Twitter for political reasons. I simply can't get over the arrogance and entitlement of the man. He didn't like the tenor of the conversation taking place between hundreds of millions of people on 'global town square' so he bought it in order to change conversation more to his liking.

I don’t think it’ll be insular for that long, they’re starting to follow everyone over here.

It’s such a self-serving definition of insular too. I follow shark biologists, comic book artists, medieval historians, and homeschoolers, but that’s an echo chamber unless I’m following conservative pundits and terfs? Give me a break.

Ответ для espieglerie

I think the same way about leftists who claim BlueSky is boring because everyone agrees too much. How? Where? 🫨🙄 Maybe they only see 2 accounts on their timeline feed?

Ответ для Blue Honey

I assume people chatting amiably about their differences without name calling means nobody disagrees. If there aren’t threats of violence is it really discourse?

Ответ для Blue Honey

Bluesky was kinda boring before xodus

Ответ для espieglerie

Right?? I’m following artists, comics people, game devs, animators, writers, techies, engineers, programmers, archeologists, historians, photographers, crafters, farmers, birders, science people of all kinds, journalists, political wonks, people with random niche interests… from all over the world!

Ответ для Queen Gwenevere

And that’s the other thing… the people hand-wringing about “echo chambers” seem to only focus on accounts from the US. But this site is GLOBAL! You can have an entire robust feed that’s neither in English nor American, if you want! There’s tons of accounts on here that don’t care about US issues.

That's exactly what they're saying. We need to suck it up and just take it.

I was hoping that when we left, they would just be happy to fight among themselves. It would be a shallow dig to pick each other apart.

FUCK THAT! I have been here from the beginning (well, I tried, but they didn't let everyone in then). I am NOT going back to that cesspool.

the far right does not engage in open honest discourse... bluesky is not itself pro-left, it simply allows users to curate their own experience. this is the key to it's value. if we deprive the far right of an audience for it's nonsense they become enraged....but we blocked them...so...

I never convinced even one, not a single damn troll over there to change their views or even CONSIDER it. This discourse is singularly driven by people who are invested in having someone to abuse in order to create a narrative surrounding the arguing itself and none of the actual thoughts involved.

Yeah, frankly I consider “people who previously tolerated racists but don’t now” to be as diverse as my conversations need to get. Racists and people who tolerate racists for any any reason are disqualified and I’ve been doing that sometimes quite aggressively since the 80s.

That’s not the danger. The danger of living in an insular world is that you start thinking that your own shit doesn’t stink. As an example, let me show you my hometown of Oakland.

'go make your own space so we don't have to think about the fact you exist' 'ok' 'no not like that'

They don't have anything worth listening to and without an audience of victims, its just them in an Echo chasm posting the same shit about Hitler over and over.

and us saying "no thanks" is somehow threatening

Ответ для KLM

Sure hard to miss how many of the authors of these pieces are transphobes of various shades

Ответ для Joe Katz

somehow they're all the types who call us "the trans issue" instead of people 🥰

Ответ для KLM

Bunch of assholes

Ответ для Joe Katz

What you said 👆🏻

Ответ для KLM

No it's just something them to make a big deal about. Like VP Harris working at McDonald's and President Obama's tan suit. They are ridiculous people that voted for a criminal.

Ответ для KLM

It is threatening the machine that is meant to disinfranchise and promote "Learned Helplessness."

Ответ для KLM

"I'm offended and scared that you desire to not be able to hear that I think you shouldn't exist, even by force if we feel like it" Yeahhhh...they can go shove that up their ass; I don't give a shit how much of a problem being somewhere that actually enforces decency again causes for them.

This. Also I really hate how in their minds I am apparently supposed to WANT to spent my free time, that I am not paid for, engaging with the far right OF ANOTHER COUNTRY. In my second language, no less. why would I want to do that.

It’s no silo, it’s a healthy boundary to cut abusive, discriminatory people off. Those pieces are written by people who refuse to see their own offensive views and behavior. They shirk responsibility by scapegoating the people they bully. Cut them off. They can wallow in their own dysfunction on X.

Even if people have "different perspectives" or "different points of view," I still believe in common courtesy. There are thoughtful and intelligent ways to disagree, persuade, and even argue. A troll or an outraged person isn't actually trying to engage in productive conversation.

Ответ для KC Momkin

If you sit down to play chess or Wingspan with someone and they get mad and knock over the board, they really aren't playing the game you thought you were sitting down to. They are abusing your good faith and wasting your time. The people who are insulting Bluesky have something to lose.

Ответ для KC Momkin

Don't let people who hate you tell you who you are. Don't let Bluesky's competitors (and their friends) label it. Honestly, if they want to play "who is the biggest jerk" nobody is stopping them from playing that on other sites.

Bullies are cowards who need the vulnerable to pick on to make themselves feel stronger, more important, better about themselves. MAGAt Psycho cowards are the worst. I sure don't miss anything about that bad place. 🎶Blue skies are smiling on me. Blue skies are all I see. 🎶🎶

Likewise, your allies 🙋‍♀️ are expected to "listen to both sides" of any "debate" over your right to exist.

Ответ для Gaye Sherman

If they listen, they ain't my ally.

And let’s be real, what’s occurring is not actually “discourse.”

Ответ для Rachel Laing

Exactly. It's 90% name calling and other insults, and 10% arguments we have heard dozens of times before.

Ответ для tuneberryjam🇨🇦

That's it right there. They are just filled with anger and fear. I don't want any part of it.

Though I don’t think ‘public discourse’ is the actual thing they really want us for, at this stage..

Also I don't know why journalists think that people should be, like, required to follow or talk to others on a social media site? No one requires that if you subscribe to a newspaper or magazine that you read it from cover to cover.

Ответ для littlemouse16

Right? Maybe this notion that social media is not real life, while having a root in a useful reflection, is taken too far. Tons of super real people doing their normal life things and just chatting with each other.

Ответ для Kate Mereand

Telling someone to engaging online with people they don’t like and be in a space where they are abused is awful. It’s like telling someone to go to a bar where people keep getting in fights and hurting other people. Don’t we usually tell people NOT to go places like that?

Ответ для Kate Mereand

Exactly. I remember when you were advised to avoid online spaces where the people sucked. Didn't see it happen much, but that advice was there, and now we're being gaslit into venturing into spaces where only abuse exists?

Ответ для littlemouse16

Because if you've bought the newspaper or magazine, they have your money regardless of what you do with it. They need the engagement to generate revenue on social media. They don't phrase it as "you have to follow *ME* back" but that's what it really is, nothing but self interest.

Ответ для littlemouse16

They're lazy-ass stenographers for the powerful who don't actually do any journalism worthy of the name. They want to watch and "report on" Twitter beatdowns.

How about we keep this a place where no matter our differences and disagreements, everyone is treated with dignity and respect?

The bigots on Twitter are just as empowered to spew their bile there as they were a month ago. What has changed (for now) is that other people aren't forced to read it.

It reminds me so much of the language and spiel that abusers use to keep thier vicitims silent and submissive when they're trying to get away from them.

Ahh nope!

This is a really great point! We deserve to have a safe space to exist. I have had people say not to 'flaunt' your sexuality. But straight people hold hands in public. We can't do that? We can't be ourselves because it's 'too much' for them???

BS. I won't take abuse as a straight. You shouldn't as Bi, gay, lesbian or trans

They presume that this place has a purpose of their choosing and they def what the vulnerable to be the ones to suffer for it.

It's ridiculous

We are not the Right’s punching bag

It feels like a fabricated criticism. I have been exposed to new perspectives and information in the week I have been on here. A requirement that discourse is civil promotes diversity of ideas, because people are debating the ideas themselves, not people's worth.

It's weird. Bsky feels like a forum to me. Trying to make it back into Twitter at the cost of human decency is such a fuck ass take.

I am not any of those things and I’m not putting up with it. I’ve cut out a lot of people from my life that thinks it’s ok to say such vile things to me, because I’m not part of a marginalized, vulnerable group. My parents raised me better than that.

It's a continuation of the problematic views that the abused are tools that the abusers have a right to use.