Обсуждение

Amazing reliance here on what they call "correlation," without any numbers or citations whatsoever. In that spirit, here's another amazing correlation: all these changes to long-established science came about exactly at the moment the CDC became the plaything of the roadkill prince of Camelot.

Antivaxxers: “Don’t trust science” v “Trust the CDC”.

This at NIH: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24814559/

Uh, it is absolutely an evidence based claim that vaccines do not cause autism.

Oh sweet the CDC is doing “can’t prove it ain’t epistemology” that’s so fucking rad.

Studies have not ruled out the possibility that wearing ball caps causes premature baldness in men. Studies have not ruled out the possibility that eating peanut butter causes freckles. Studies have not ruled out the possibility that the moon is made of green cheese.

Which is a lie. That claim HAS been ruled out.

Presumably you can never actually rule out the possibility of many things. That doesn't mean they're not extremely unlikely. Jesus Christ the US is fucked.

And with that, the value of anything published by the CDC has evaporated. One day, we'll make these motherfuckers pay.

I want RFK Jr.'s head on a pike. He has killed more Americans than the last century of wars.

Ugh yes, yes they have.

We have not definitely ruled out whether a dog can play basketball

Can't prove mermaids don't exist, therefore mermaids exist.

They want to kill us all as quickly as possible so they can have all the money and houses and food but with no one to build the houses, grow the food or serve it to them.

"The claim 'the earth is round' is not an evidence-based claim because studies have not ruled out the possibility that the "earth is flat and balanced on the back of a giant turtle."

RFK needs to never see the outside of a prison cell.

It's so annoying that they're weaponizing legitimate rhetoric tactics like this. It's kind of technically true because it's impossible to prove a negative, but to any sane person the correct phrasing would be "the claim that 'vaccines DO cause autism' is not evidence-based because it's unproven".

Stop promoting debunked conspiracy bullshit. Studies never make 100% black/white declarations, they state what evidence does/doesn’t support; and they’ve been clear on that re: this issue. Say so! This is why people are revolting against the corporate media

The CDC has been destroyed by fragments of Russell's Teapot falling from the sky. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell...

The claim that RFK does not have brain worms is not scientific because no studies have ruled out that RFK has worms in his brain.

Idk about autism but after having the vaccines as a baby I had severe physical reactions and illness. Vaccines work by triggering the immune system and behave like a targeted infection. It's same how I was told SSRIs were ok but they gave me severe PSSD and lifelong DPDR. Guess some are sensitive.

I don’t envy those scientists with integrity left working for CDC. Stay and try and help the world’s most vulnerable (and risk being seen as complicit), or resign knowing that it won’t change what’s coming?

We live in the worst timeline

'Civet coffee does not cause autism' is not an evidence-based claim because studies have not ruled out the possibility that coffee cherries excreted by civets cause autism.

These people are evil. Pure and simple. They've spread so much fear about vaccines, new parents are even rejecting the *vitamin K* shot.🤦 The increase infant death has increased by about 3%. Their response is often "God's will." 😢

The claim "there are no purple dwarves living under Antartica" also is not an evidence-based claim because there have been no studies conducted to rule that possibility out.

This is the one for people to bookmark. Meta data of over ONE MILLION CHILDREN. Its about the best quality of evidence you can get. Save it and share at every opportunity. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24814559/

Studies haven't ruled out vaccines turning kids in to sentient turkeys either 🙄 Everything about this is dangerously absurd.

UPDATE!!! That was added in Nov. New info as of today is: Scientists have not identified the root causes of autism. HHS continues to support rigorous scientific research and will update this page as reliable new evidence becomes available

In that case let me warn everyone that scientists have yet to rule out RFK Jr. as a source of herpes.

I still don't know why we're letting that decayed sack of shit-- who has NO MEDICAL TRAINING WHATSOEVER-- destroy the entirety of public health. Even when he shows up at congress, nobody mentions his *complete* lack of relevant knowledge, skills, or credentials. We don't have to live like this.

Yeah have they ruled out splitting infinitives in the second trimester causes autism? Not scientific to claim it doesn't. I want ruled out maternal grandfather having seen anything with Diana Dors in. Any evidence eh CDC? Why the silence? Big "Dors" got you cowed?

No. FDT. FRFK,JR. FGOP. 8647

Uhm, they know that this is not how anything works? So, „UFOs don’t cause autism“ is also not an „evidence-based claim“..?!

studies have not ruled out the possibility that vaccines cause the growth of a monkey tail on your butt

Yikes. I feel like not understanding the null hypothesis should be disqualifying.

"The claim 'RFK Jr. does not huff donkey farts' is not an evidence-based claim because studies have not ruled out the possibility that RGK Jr. does in fact huff donkey farts."

So sue the DHS over the claim and force them to prove that vaccines cause autism or retract that bullshit.

Oh for fuck’s sake!

Trump wants to blame someone as usual, because it seems quite likely his son is on the spectrum.

That's quite true. We haven't ruled out that autism isn't caused by UFOs, either

new slam dunk maga argument: "can you ever even really like, know something, man?"

Studies have not ruled out that Republicans cause autism.

fwiw they started adding the false info including the topline stuff back in november. i'm sure they've made it worse with the latest updates though

Believe the burden of proof here would be to show vaccines cause autism, not that they don’t.

Studies have not ruled out the possibility that RFK is a goblin that escaped David Bowie’s Labyrinth.

The Trump CDC is just clown shoes at this point Wild how every agency that used to be trustworthy is just a bad circus set up in a mall parking lot now

Change “vaccines” to immigrants and “autism” to crime and the same people are happy to claim a link, evidence or not. “Insufficient evidence” only matters for things they’re already opposed to.

Have they ruled out if tacos cause autism? Or clouds?

What in the Russell's teapot is this bullshit

Mother fuckers They're killing children with this bullshit

I hate these morons. “The claim 'unicorns do not exist' is not an evidence-based claim because studies have not ruled out the possibility that unicorns do exist."

Oh, for fuck's sake.

You know what causes autism, raw milk Prove me wrong.

Not that this isn't terrible, but hasn't it been this way since November? www.factcheck.org/2025/11/revi...

Gee, I wonder how much evidence would be enough? Oh, none? Another 50 years of studies and however many millions more subjects still not enough? But a few frauds and TV celebrities saying, "maybe," and that's enough for the affirmative? Wonderful. Glad he's in charge of our health.