Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

Публикация

stripping OMB of the ability to dole out grants is an enormous win, this nukes the SAVE act, it prohibits further ICE bailouts, adding a "no, really, trump can't break already on-the-books laws regarding elections the federal government doesn't run" clause would be both unnecessary and unproductive

Murshed Zaheed

Patty Murray and Chuck Schumer decide to strike a “bipartisan” deal with … checks notes … Susan Collins to fund the Trump regime through December which appears to not to any include any safeguards against Trump’s meddling with midterm elections.

Обсуждение

40 прямых ответов · 156 сообщений

Oh, good. Thought it must be something like that

Indeed, here is the proper framing bsky.app/profile/cdel...

Colette Delawalla, PhD

THIS IS WHAT PEOPLE POWER ACCOMPLISHES! Thank you thank you thank you to everyone who wrote comments, contacted Congress, and yelled! This is OUR WIN! @standupforscience.net www.politico.com/news/2026/08...

ok but what if it increases Collins’s chances among voters who are politically engaged & informed enough to follow budget stuff but haven’t already made their choice

Ответ для Devin

That’s like five people in Maine.

Ответ для Devin

maybe this would have been a good point like 30 years ago. but there are very few informed people left- if any- who are undecided. today's undecided voters are the type of people who think data centers are powered by the blood of virgins and don't remember which party is killing the virgins

Ответ для mrsomerton

(I was being sarcastic)

Ответ для Devin

didn't quite come through to me, but very well then

Scientists and the public mobilized to submit hundreds of thousands of comments and yell at Congress to oppose the OMB rule change. It's a win. We fight to win.

Ответ для reggie seidman

Or "I get engagement when I pretend to be mad" at least.

Ответ для Primordial Platypus

Shitting on Dems for clout is a Bluesky tradition!

Also “safeguards against Trump’s meddling with midterm elections” are going to have to come from the courts. How do you write a bill saying “the president doesn’t have control over elections” when the constitution already says that?

I'm not pretending to be any kind of policy expert myself, but it's kind of incredible how many people are chronically online and politically engaged, but don't seem to actually have any interest in what any bills actually do, how politicians actually vote, and what candidates actually say.

Ответ для WeirwoodTreeHugger

See also my favorite genre of Bluesky posts. "No Democrats are talking about (insert issue here)" when 30 seconds of research turns up multiple instances of Democrats talking about (said issue). Throw in the words "feckless" and "establishment" somewhere, and baby, you got yourself engagement stew!

Holy fuck. That first one is HUGE. As is the ICE bailout and election law stuff. The SAVE Act, I think is mostly just window dressing (still good!) because making it operational by Nov is a pipedream. But it still coild habe caused chaos, which may have been enough.

stopping the Save act and prevent Vought from deciding science grants are kind of a big deal

Ответ для Russell Cohn

This was one of their main policy goals!

if you account for the Dems' minority party status in both chambers this seems a lot closer to "running the table [of actually physically possible outcomes]" than "surrender to [not actually at all] prop up seemingly-DOA Maine Senator election chances"

Ответ для escapedexplorer

like yeah the OMB stuff is only temporary with the CR but it also means that *Russ Vought is kept from nuking the entire country's scientific community* for another third of a year, and then we're in the lame duck period where they're gonna have even less juice to muscle shit through

Ответ для escapedexplorer

They’re just going to copy it over to the next CR and/or until Dems are able to rescind the rule, and it’s hard to pass any kind of spending without the support of the chair of the appropriations committee, so that’s just straight up paranoid framing.

Funny how these people never complain about their Lord and Savior Bernie Sanders having no legislative accomplishments after 35 years in Congress.

I am so happy I upgraded Senators from Orrin Hatch to Patty Murray.

Anybody not enthused Vought gets his toys taken away is just telling us they didn't understand the serious problem in the first place.

That’s Murshed’s stick. He’s been doing it for 15 years, ever since he left Reid’s office.

Ответ для Dana Houle

Ah, yet another one of the Reid staffers who wasn't good enough to work for Reid's replacement or get hired by a lobbying firm. He apparently blocked Mike Black because Black exposed how idiotic he was being, so I thought Mike was responding to Jentleson.

Doesn't it only limit the OMB from blatantly breaking the law until December? Is that really worth handing Susan Collins a bipartisan win?

Ответ для Imaginary Internet Guy

Really? The win is keeping government employees paid. Jesus. I’m not a gov employee but people are too quick to push a shutdown when they won’t be the ones getting screwed. Just bc you think it helps republicans doesn’t mean it doesn’t benefit Dems.

Ответ для Imaginary Internet Guy

Yes.

And since Collins is Appropriations chair, there's really no way but through her ... I trust Murray to know what's up.

Ответ для David Bonowitz

Patty Murray has been pretty consistently good, very glad to have her representing Washington in the US Senate

this punts spending and appropriation discussions into the lame duck, when both congressional republicans and the white house will almost certainly have even less political leverage than they have now

Ответ для GOLIKEHELLMACHINE

I would also read the fact that collins is the one willing to make a deal as a sign shes sweating the election. She doesn't want the added pressure of a shutdown on top of the amount of hatred shes already getting and being willing to make a deal to keep it from being an issue is a sign shes nervous

Ответ для Lazear

She is chair of the committee and there is no deal without her.

Ответ для JennyIL (Gail & Lennie’s human)

I am aware. Doesn't change the fact that if she didnt want one she could easily block it. Her wanting a deal is a sign of weakness.

Ответ для Lazear

It is a sign of overall weakness on the part of the GOP and a lack of desire to have another government shut down right before the election but unlikely to be a sign she is concerned about winning her Senate race.

Ответ для GOLIKEHELLMACHINE

patty murray good imo

Ответ для Belle Tur

She should fix the Mariners.

Ответ для Norm Charlatan

one does not fix the mariners.

Ответ для Belle Tur

“Just one more trade bro” - Jerry Dipoto

Ответ для Belle Tur

she is an extremely effective appropriator and people who think she did something wrong here absolutely don't know ball

Ответ для GOLIKEHELLMACHINE

also ive missed almost all the screaming about this. mute filters STRONK. mute filters GOOD.

Ответ для GOLIKEHELLMACHINE

I have no dog in this fight but it seems a coherent package to back. I suppose the only outside risk is Reps doing something mental in the lame duck period but that was a possibility anyway

Ответ для GOLIKEHELLMACHINE

if things don't change radically, which they are. using last decade's metrics is a death march for people in the US.

the idea that this is going to save susan collins' seat is brain-melted social media overload, of all the things maine voters don't care about, they definitely don't fucking care about a short-term funding CR, but i'm not convinced dems can get away with blaming a *third* shutdown on republicans

Ответ для GOLIKEHELLMACHINE

this is good

Ответ для GOLIKEHELLMACHINE

I remain convinced that a party that's got all three branches (and is compelled to use domination rhetoric) is incapable of escaping responsibility for the failure of government to function.

Ответ для Encinitas Highlands Surfer

that might be true, we can check again in january

Ответ для GOLIKEHELLMACHINE

This is an act of desperation from Collins and we should celebrate Murray and Schumer for neutering government funding as a last minute wedge issue

Ответ для GOLIKEHELLMACHINE

They can under the right circumstances! Like for example if Trump/house rs baulk at this deal

Ответ для GOLIKEHELLMACHINE

These people understand that we are the minority party, right? However badly the GOP is in disarray there is still a pretty hard ceiling on what Schumer and pals can actually do Chuck sucks for a bunch of actual reasons, we don’t have to make up new ones

Ответ для Andrew Nelson
Ответ для GOLIKEHELLMACHINE

I do think they could get away with it but agree that this deal seems pretty ok

Ответ для GOLIKEHELLMACHINE

and it's not like they sought Collins out for a deal or anything. Collins and Murray are announcing this because they are the chair and ranking member of the appropriations committee

Ответ для Matt Weiner

Right, whatever spending deal happens is going to go through Collins.

Ответ для John

It’s the main reason why she’s so popular in both the Senate and Maine.

Ответ для Brianna Chesser

Well, she's always been a senior Republican on the committee but she only became the ranking Republican in 2023.

Ответ для GOLIKEHELLMACHINE

I’m in agreement with you, but for one point you may have overlooked: Trump would somehow make it worse and end up taking credit for the shutdown. I’m good with a smart play, but don’t elide the irrationality of some of the actors here.

Ответ для GOLIKEHELLMACHINE

If you follow Sen. Murray, you'll have seen the parade of blockables in her comment thread yelling at her about saving Collins's bacon. Thank you for expressing it so neatly

Ответ для GOLIKEHELLMACHINE

Especially sincr the last one had the at least somewhat popular we don't want to give a massive budget to ICE goons. What is the messaging for this one? It seems a lot to gamble right before the midterms that the GOP will take the blame again.

Ответ для ansonimaachi

Especially for something that in a couple of months the median voter will not remember if they even knew about it in the first place.

Ответ для ansonimaachi

yeah the grants thing and the slush fund don't land the same way for most people, especially the grants, even though that's a very big deal.

Ответ для GOLIKEHELLMACHINE

enh we'd get away with it. I think most voters understanding of govt shutdowns doesn't go far beyond blaming the party in the white house

Ответ для GOLIKEHELLMACHINE

i think some people are also thinking the dems somehow sought out collins for this just fishing for someone to make a deal with, not really comprehending that she's chair of the appropriations committee?

Ответ для Musicology Duck

also correct, a lot of people are following this asshole's lead and being like, "and murray is PROMOTING this" and it's like, you dumbass, communicating this *is literally her job*

Ответ для GOLIKEHELLMACHINE

There is a lot to worry about in terms of what the last ten+ years have done to governance in this country, but one of my bigger fears is that people - even ones ostensibly on our side - have forgotten that Congress isn’t just a fucking reality show with people being shitheads on Twitter all day

Ответ для Andrew Nelson

yeah i know i'm on blocklists for being a "liberal" when mostly i just .... live across the street from congress and know how ball is actually played, not how we imagine it's played and i think *truly* understanding things like committee work is crucial to what we want to see happen going forward

Ответ для Musicology Duck

I appreciate your posts and know this isn’t what you meant but I do like to imagine congress on the lawn playing spikeball in tank tops

Ответ для ceej

i would be down with that being a new tradition in the 120th

Ответ для Musicology Duck

I'm really enjoying your posts from the streets of DC!

Ответ для Musicology Duck

So few people have actually attended a committee meeting or even participated in any group run by Robert's Rules, and it shows. It's not dark magic, it's people arguing over things, and occasionally egos get in the way, but mostly it's tilting at windmills because somebody hates the Oxford comma.

Ответ для gepandz

i mean congressional committees run the hearings and investigations everyone is very much hoping for, so i'm not sure i'd reduce it quite that way

Ответ для Musicology Duck

Apologies; I think that came across as a knock against you, and I meant that to agree with your point, not imply that you were among those who don't know how things work.😅❤️ Committee ops are a core part of parliamentary procedure, and where most of the work gets done. Wish more folks did local RRO.

Ответ для gepandz

The closest I’ve ever seen anyone I know get into a fistfight was over Robert’s Rules of Order. Yes, I work in politics.

Ответ для gepandz

"[H]ates the Oxford comma"?!? That's pure unadulterared EVIL!!!

Ответ для Musicology Duck

All your posts are golden and I'm very fortunate to see them. Honestly I put time and effort into trying to understand how this all works and I wish people could even do that a little bit. At least so they stop getting angry at shadows.

Ответ для Musicology Duck

Someone recently told me I should consider moving to Capitol Hill from Woodley Park because the Congressional Cemetery is my favorite place in DC but I thought of the times you posted about seeing pols at the liquor store and knew I couldn't handle such a thing in my life.

Ответ для Screamscaper

my problem isn't living in capitol hill per se, it's living too close to the united states senate

Ответ для Musicology Duck

i don't think i'd have enough self-control for that kind of situation.

Ответ для Musicology Duck

Proximity to Ace Beverage vs. proximity to Congress ...tough call. That amazing and yet economical oloroso I got there once vs. possibility of running into Ted Cruz?

Ответ для Musicology Duck

Also having a facility for recognizing people’s faces, I can’t remember ever seeing a member when I lived on Capitol Hill (bc I wouldn’t have recalled their face.) Which pales in comparison to my SO interviewing Nancy Pelosi at the Honors red carpet without knowing who she was.

Ответ для Josh Landau

yeah that's a freaky skill i almost wish i could get rid of 😂

Ответ для Musicology Duck

Mine has waned a little after almost 40 years of pot consumption, but not enough to make a difference. It’s still annoying sometimes when I’m stuck on “how/why do I know this person?”

Ответ для Musicology Duck

Anyone who blocks you for being a liberal is not worth knowing.

Ответ для Musicology Duck

oh noes not a liberal honestly this platform sometimes

Ответ для Musicology Duck

I'm old enough to remember when Repuublicans were the ones using "liberal" as a derogatory term.

Ответ для Darkrose

even if they used a different term, my point was more that my beliefs and alignments on the political spectrum are generally not correctly assumed by people reading my posts that are just pretty literally reporting out on what's happening

Ответ для Musicology Duck

Gotcha. It does seem like liberal on this site means "anything I don't agree with."

Ответ для Musicology Duck

That guy is either lying about his CV or lying about congress, and I’m willing to bet that it’s both.

Ответ для GOLIKEHELLMACHINE

There are a bunch of people claiming Dems want Collins to win instead of Jackson (because he's a progessive), and it's taking all my self restraint to only block them.

Ответ для Karl Magnacca

honestly at this point I'd go with it, sometimes I do and it can only good happen. otherwise I'm just yelling at some other rando and what's the point

Ответ для Karl Magnacca

Fight that good fight, brother! 😁

Ответ для GOLIKEHELLMACHINE

people are such politics nerds on here and yet (myself included) still often misinformed normal people are not paying the remotest attention to this shit. Things like "she voted for the guy who killed Roe v Wade and to give the masked death squads more money," more so.

Ответ для GOLIKEHELLMACHINE

They don't know who the chair and ranking member of the appropriations committee are.

Ответ для GOLIKEHELLMACHINE

Well of course! Murray is doing the much-desired "messaging" over a legitimate win So the messaging and the win must now be decimated and ridiculed!!

Ответ для Musicology Duck

Also, as someone who’s in-laws live in Maine and was just there to visit: Collins is getting hammered on the airwaves. Every third commercial is about her Kavanaugh vote. She is sweating big.

Ответ для Burnished rows of steel

Good!

Ответ для Musicology Duck

That's the first indication that that post is grifty nonsense

Ответ для Musicology Duck

A big mistake that people who are highly engaged but not knowledgeable make is not understanding that there are many more leadership positions in Congress than just majority/minority leader and speaker of the house.

Ответ для WeirwoodTreeHugger

yeah i a hundred percent agree with that

Ответ для Musicology Duck

i've sort of come to suspect some people are even actually mad at the structure of congress itself, no matter how well or poorly they understand it--but no matter what, congress is always going to be people having to get decisions made with hundreds of their closest coworkers

Ответ для Musicology Duck

Part of it, outside of complexity, is that Congress has neutered their own power over time, so there’s less coverage of the palace intrigue on the hill in three mainstream

Ответ для Gee

* the mainstream

Ответ для GOLIKEHELLMACHINE

In about 2 weeks most everyone is going to forget this even happened

Ответ для GOLIKEHELLMACHINE

They never got to blame them for the first two tbh

Ответ для GOLIKEHELLMACHINE

I take your point but I think the GOP has taken the blame for pretty much every government shutdown since Clinton. "No government" is their brand!

Ответ для GOLIKEHELLMACHINE

I can't imagine selling this to voters. "So the OMB, that's the Office of..." and they're gone

Ответ для GOLIKEHELLMACHINE

Exactly, Dems are just about maximizing their gains in the midterms and the downside risk of another shutdown outweighs any marginal benefit. Also US voters have the attention span of fruit flies so I doubt they’d remember something that happened in late October by election day.

Ответ для GOLIKEHELLMACHINE

I mean this what she's doing here is, what *should* be a basic fucking Congressional function. she doesn't get a cookie because she occasionally acts like a normal person instead of just another fucking mutant Republican.

Ответ для Democracy Dies in Dorkness

i still think she's toast for the record literally nothing Jackson is hammering her on changes here. nor do the fundamentals in Maine. or the general "throw the fossilized Establishment out" vibe.

Ответ для Democracy Dies in Dorkness

You’re wrong. The reason people keep voting for her here is the money.I know plenty of Democrats who vote for her for just that reason.Its a good year for Democrats but Troy Jackson can’t deliver that funding.Many voters LIKE that she’s establishment-it makes our little poor little state richer.

Ответ для gooseyflowerchild

hmmm well, guess we'll see.

Ответ для gooseyflowerchild

She’s extremely talented at pork barrel politics (statement of fact, not a judgment)

Ответ для Brianna Chesser

I know Murk is. I guess we'll see if it's enough for Concerned Collins this time. I wonder if yknow, she gets some stuff but life has still gotten worse on the whole, if someone new talking kitchen table (among other things) seems more attractive

Ответ для Democracy Dies in Dorkness

Alaska in particular seems well set up for the special carve out but i'm just kibitzing here

Ответ для Brianna Chesser

I can’t think of a single industry in this state that she hasn’t delivered money to.Her constituent services (run by her staff) are quite good.I sincerely hope I’m wrong but it’s going to be hard to overcome that.It’s so frustrating the extent to which she holds her coalition together.

Ответ для GOLIKEHELLMACHINE

I live in ME. She keeps getting elected because of this shit. She can deliver outsized funding to the state.Lots of Democrats own or work in non-profits & small businesses.She’s able to peel off a good number of Democrats just because of the money. She has a coalition of voters from all sides.

Ответ для GOLIKEHELLMACHINE

Republicans control everything at the federal level. I don't see how they possibly *avoid* blame, given that. In fact, they've been responsible for every shutdown in US history, except the very first partial(?) shutdown under Carter(?), which, iirc, lasted like a day?

Ответ для GOLIKEHELLMACHINE

Dems are very likely to take at least the House. The media definitely won't parrot a Dem-friendly shutdown narrative at this point.

Ответ для GOLIKEHELLMACHINE

I agree with you, but the steelman of the other side is that shutting down the gov't through Nov might hurt Trump more. I don't know that I believe that but it's not nuts.

The first part basically prevents the wholesale destruction of the American scientific sector

Ответ для Melico

And also the ability for Russell Vought to take over state budgets

Ответ для Rijji

It’s a big deal for the foreign aid that actually has been appropriated, too

3 months out from the midterms, and I am paying attention to who’s trying to promote and escalate disgust with Democrats.

Ответ для jdm

Just checking here: at what point will those of us who fall actually left of center be allowed to express disgust with Dems who think sternly worded letters will really stick it to Republicans this time?

Ответ для Mx Wolfkitten

The point is that that’s not what is happening here, though. This is Senate Democrats extracting some pretty remarkable concessions for being in a minority position.

Ответ для Mx Wolfkitten

When you can articulate actual criticisms and not just tired talking points

Murshed stirring up his followers with the most bad faith interpretation? Shocking.

Yeah that dolt has been on mute for as long as I’ve been here.

The OMB delay brought me to near tears. People not paying attention don’t realize how catastrophic that is. Like scientific enterprise, economy crashing shit

Weren't a bunch of safeguards already enacted for federal elections after 2020?

Ответ для Heather Small

yes

i’m not gonna hand it to Chuck, however he has demonstrated the ability to make strategic moves at limiting and/or checking abuses without the majority and the OMB stuff Vought is up to is potentially catastrophic

Ответ для jeremy

You won't hand it to chuck because he's actually capable and does things to frustrate the trump admin?

Ответ для Proud Anselmo

i think he’s a skilled negotiator but also a flawed centrist.

Ответ для jeremy

He's far better at doing stuff than he is at talking about doing stuff and hitting all the online buzzwords people want to hear. This is a problem on Bluesky where people care more about talk than about action.

Ответ для The Final Peckening

It's not just a BSky problem, unfortunately. Polls (and fundraising) consistently show that while individual Dem politicians are popular, the party as a whole, and its leadership, are very unpopular, with many wanting the Dems to "do something" to stop trump. Of course none of these people think...

Ответ для Proud Anselmo

...that the people who should "do something" are them, and the something they should do is actually learn how Congress works, instead of perpetually getting mad over things they don't understand.

also i would guess that this is one of those CRs that will be passed with most/all Dems+a handful of Rs, which could lead to infighting between the hardliners like Scott, Lee, etc and the rest of their majority

The positive impact on foreign aid alone makes it a great deal! OMB does not have any right to redirect resources or rescind them, especially in the fucked up reality we livein where EPA can’t enforce the Clean Water Act or the Clean Air Act. www.nytimes.com/2026/08/02/h...

U.S. Restores Some Vaccine and Health Aid to Unicef, Gavi and World Food Programme (Gift Article)The amount is still far below what the U.S. spent previously on humanitarian and health aid, but resumes the flow of money for key efforts to fight malnutrition and disease.www.nytimes.com

Schumer needs to fucking go

Ответ для Sisuthefin

I think you meant to put this reply on the original Zaheed skeet, not the one demonstrating how fucking stupid he’s being.

Ответ для Sisuthefin

Are you lost?

Ответ для Dazzling Jrielg

Sometimes

One of my senators has been really good (i live in Washington)

This is a neat outcome, i didn't even expect anything and we are getting stuff

And if it failed, imagine how this SCOTUS would interpret that.

@msnowreports.bsky.social @morningjoe-msnow.bsky.social @deadlinewh.bsky.social @weeknightmsnow.bsky.social @cnn.com @beatwithari.bsky.social @allinwithchris.bsky.social @briefingwithpsaki.bsky.social @moneypowerpolitics.bsky.social @nbcnews.com @housedemocrats.bsky.social

I think the block on OMB for the grants only lasts through the length of the CR so it’s a delay. Though hopefully they can just keep the language in the appropriations bill in December.

"for the duration of the CR", which is until Dec 11. Let's not party too hearty over this.

Please please please don't let Trump stop the Medicare part D drug supplement. We NEED to keep the $2000 max out of pocket.

Proud of my Senator Patty Murray

I seriously didn’t think they’d be able to keep the save act or the OMB thing out of this

Ответ для Mon Mothra

I didn’t think they’d get both

The “safeguard against Trump breaking laws” already exists? It’s called state and federal courts. Nothing Congress does is going to make judges willing to give Special Big Boy President a pass go “oh right? That’s illegal!” The degree to which the law is Calvinball has not penetrated.

This is the first I'm learning of this and inside I'm thinking "how could anyone portray this as Democrats caving." Outside I'm like "of course they are".