"poisoned font" is a cool and fun way to say "completely turbofucks every accessibility tool that exists" glad to know where yalls priorities lie
The RegisterOpen source project fools AI scrapers with poisoned font
Mostly complaining about politics and structural biology. At the end of everything, hold on to anything.
This is a crime just btw
Bloomberg NewsBREAKING: Anthropic announced that its artificial intelligence models had breached three different organizations during cybersecurity tests that went awry, a little more than a week after its chief rival, OpenAI, disclosed a similar incident.
Why is it that these dipshits who flame out hard are always treated like Wunderkinder whereas all the people who very correctly predicted that allathat was dumb as shit are not Archive link archive.is/aW0XA
No professional accomplishment has ever made me happier than this. theonion.com/translator-o...
This is the other problem with the lab leak: The different versions. - If the virus was engineered, then it would show signs of that. It doesn't. - If it was an accidental leak, then dead bat viruses infected humans. They can't. - If it was GOF research, then it would be SARS-1.
Ben K.I don't really understand why the lab leak freaks are so adverse to the wet market origin. Wet markets are pretty gross and inhumane. You don't need to create a lab leak bogeyman to make them bad. The leap from "lab leak" to "intentional lab leak" is frankly insane.
it is extremely funny to think that lamont was, twenty years ago, the unacceptably left-wing candidate whose primary win over former vice presidential candidate Joe Lieberman led to his sour grapes run and, downstream, the death of the public option
Opinion HaverA major issue with the establishment's efforts fending off individual progressives like El-Sayed, Hong, Chevalier, Kiros, Gonzales, Flanagan, etc, is that we're well past the point where it's clear that young voters just Do This now, and who do you think is going to make up the electorate later?
librarian hat: there are so many reasons this is bad but the book destruction angle doesn’t really do it for me. These aren’t “rare books” in the undiscovered novel sense it’s in the reference manual from 1987 sense. It makes a standard practice that makes mass digitization possible sound sinister.
Reminder that Chesterton's fence is basically the one good conservative idea
rain 🌦️if you were designing a stacked workflow from first principles, you would focus on atomic/bisectable commits as the unit of work, with interdiffs between versions to guide you. Basically what Gerrit, Phab and numerous other tools do. The lack of engagement with prior art continues to be frustrating