Публикация

thank you for this explanation

Thank you.

Thank you for this incredibly clear and useful explanation. Very helpful.

Thank you for this.

Thanks, I needed this explanation. I was getting confused.

Good lord sweet baby Jesus this why I follow you! I read a few articles one this earlier and couldn’t really understand it all until watching YOU explain it, THANK YOU! 😊

I fell into the headline trap just as you've outlined. Very much appreciate your guidance around the reality, thank you

Hello…ACLU

Thank you!

Thank you. This is what I’ve been searching attorney profiles looking for. You’re the first one to actually explain in an understandable-for-not-an-attorney way that the fight isn’t over. Thank you thank you

So incredibly helpful!

This is really good, Imani. Thank you.

Honestly, as a therapist I'm surprised anyone had the gall to be that mask off about saying, "Hmm... I don't agree with the ACA Code of Ethics." But then, there are a lot of therapists out there who shouldn't be therapists. And half of them seem to be in my state.

Thank you so much for this!

Thank you.

Thank you, Imani!

Thank you!

Thank you for providing critical detail!

Yeah, it said emotional abuse conversion therapy is okay and should succeed. A distinction with only time as the difference.

The fight is never over! Raahh!

a cartoon of a woman with a fist in the air and the word justice on the bottomALT: a cartoon of a woman with a fist in the air and the word justice on the bottommedia.tenor.com

Thank you!

Thankbyiucso much for explaining this! 🙏💪✊️

THANK YOU

Jamokes was great! Jabronis, meatheads, schmucks or knuckleheads also apt.

thank you for this - just watched on patreon. helps a lot - i was upset

I appreciate your knowledge and input on this!

Thank you so much for this

This is an excellent explanation an extremely helpful. So can I sue this one clinician for malpractice???

Thank you

Chiles v Salazar is a trojan horse. If Chiles wins then we can ALL claim to be doctors and recommend bleach to our patients. It's about NOT allowing states to license healthcare professionals.

I appreciate this clarification. It still sucks shit as an opinion but room to fight is room to fight. Thank you for standing up for us and for our trans kids in particular.

Very good succinct explanation

📌 to read later, thanks!

Thank you so very much!

Thank you!

thank you.

Thank you for the clear explanation. Also I absolutely adore your necklace!

THANK YOU!!!!

Thank you! This is very helpful.

SO MUCH info is skewed like this. Breaking news + the internet is such a dangerous combination in these early days of the Info Age. The confusion is rampant everywhere, but no more so than regarding the law and legal cases. Best to assume every story you read is not the whole story. TY, Imani!

attn: @tyrotcm.bsky.social

Thank you. I have been panicking. This video calmed me down. I appreciate you doing it

Before this video, I did not know about "as applied" challenges, and the difference from a broad-attack type case.

Really appreciate this breakdown, thank you.

"Jamokes" 🤣

While the case works its way through the lower courts, does the ban still stand (as currently written) in Colorado? I’m assuming so since there was no injunction issued…

I follow you. Can you put this in writing? Thanks.

Thank you for this. I half-expected a “The more you know” screen to show up at the end.

Thank you so much!

Thanks. Today, SCOTUS is so bad that any writings about the court that is bad for humans, we think it is real. I will be more careful in the future.

Thank you for your clear explanation!

I have missed you since I left the meta/elon sm verse. Thanks for your spirit and words.

Thank you for explaining the situation so clearly.

Omg thank you for this! I had not heard this explained fully. And #StopFuckinWithTransKids

Thank you!

Thank you for this’

Thank you for taking the time to do this.

jamokes mentioned

Thank you, Imani.

Thank you for breaking this down and telling the truth

Thank you for this explainer for the non-law degree having folks, super helpful!

a man in a suit and tie giving a thumbs upALT: a man in a suit and tie giving a thumbs upmedia.tenor.com

Thank you for explaining! <3

Thanks... It's so important but across mainstream media, decisions are impossible to understand correctly. Media view is that people can understand the most complex technology but not the concept of strict scrutiny, or whether "speech" is political, or whether it takes place in a "public forum."

Thanks for this important explainer!

Thank you, this is the readout I needed. The "as-applied" part is interesting: does that leave the door open to have to make this determination for every action involving this law?

Thanks for this clear explanation!

If the fight for Abortion rights is anything to go by, I don't think people would stop fighting even if the ruling was a lot worse. STILL, Thank you for this explanation, especially as someone who isn't fluent in legalese.

It still sucks, however.

Thank you.

Thank you for this explanation! But what is a jamoke? Am I not hip enough to know?

that's right. and thank you for enlightening me.

thank you. we can take take issue with the court's reasoning without exaggerating the impact of the case or resorting to panic.

Dred Scott II was the worst sequel ever.

Thank you again for law and sanity. Time for a Rewire News donation. :)

Thank you for the explanation. Crystal clear!

Thank you. I have trouble wrapping my head around this.

Thanks for breaking this down, very helpful.

we have been exploring something similar with rag, the Three vendors shipped competing solutions this month part is what keeps surprising us

This was super helpful thank you

Thank you for this clarification. When I initially saw the news I was devastated, but I'm not good at legalese. This is far better than I had initially thought.

thank you very much for this, Ms. Gandy

reached the point where I just block people posting misinformation about this kind of stuff. shatterzone.substack.com/p/the-trans-... very relevant right now

The Trans Panic Clickbait EconomyA series of misleading claims have gone viral this month, sowing fear and confusion about ICE targeting trans people, a transgender public registry, and an imminent gender-affirming healthcare ban.shatterzone.substack.com

Thank you for this clarification. I was lost in the headlines-level only coverage I’ve seen so far today.

I mean Sotomayor and Kagan have their reasoning why they went with the majority!

Thank you!

Thank you ❤️

Thank you so much for the explanation! 🙏

I appreciate the information. This is a nice alternative to the narratives I've been seeing this morning. Please don't do subtitles with varying colors and sizes, it makes them more difficult to follow.

Never stop fighting. I will fight for trans rights until I leave this earth. They're not going to win. But until then, protect trans kids with everything you've got.

Thank you Imani

Thank you

Thank you.

thank you for this clarification

You are the best. Thank you.

I am surprised that the NYT's Ann Marimow didn't give a byline on her piece, to Josh Hawley's wife--might as well have been written by her, in terms of the completely misleading framing about what was actually before the court

This is so helpful - thank you!

Bless you and yours thank you for this

@down.blue

Thank you for this!!

@unroll.skywriter.blue please unroll

Why is it so difficult for people to make sense like you do? You are a treasure!

i was kind of wondering about this, because i have literally lost count of the number of times i've seen coverage (even from leftist outfits) saying "SCOTUS rules babies illegal!!!" and it turns out it was a ruling on, like, standing

thank you for this

Thank you so much for this.

Thanks so much for the courtsplaining we all needed. This is a relief to hear, & I will co-sign: rights are a never ending, never surrender lifelong battle we all need to stay engaged in.

Thanks so much for the clarity!!!

Thank you again for all the great work you do!

<3

thank you for this

THANK YOU for a clearly stated explanation of today's ruling.☮💙☮

This is just masterpiece cake shop for conversion therapy

That stuff with Byron Noem makes me laugh. But it's really kicking someone when they're down at this point. Keep kicking her, hard, she earned it 100%. Leave the poor man alone. There is literally nothing wrong with his role play / costume / expression. He may be a hypocrite, but enough is enough.

Even if conversion therapy bans are struck down, can't states treat it like "solicitation"? Ban anyone from paying for it. Having sex is not illegal. Discussing paying for it is. I can see it now: "conversion therapists" on the street corner approaching cars: "hey, looking for a terrible time?"

Thank you

Thank you for thinking through this and sharing your insight with the rest of us. I think a lot of trans people are quite reasonably panicking rn, including me for much of the day, so I'm really grateful you took the time to not only say this, but in an unambiguously affirming way

is there a link to this i can share on Facebook other than just a link to this Bluesky post (which no one will ever click on because there's no preview)?

Thank you. I wouldn't have known that even if I read it word for word because of the legalese.

Thank you for explaining this

Thank you. I had a feeling that the reactions to this ruling were born from not really understanding it. I knew there had to be more to the story.

Tysm for this. Was very concerned for my nephew and this was very helpful

I'm glad people are being civil to you. I did not expect them to be.

This is splitting hairs. It is a terrible decision

@strictscrutiny.bsky.social @leahlitman.bsky.social @profmmurray.bsky.social @kateshaw.bsky.social

they are 100% jamokes, thank you for explaining what happened.

this is just to say thank you for this video!! also i loveee your glasses

I appreciate you so much!!

Thank you so much for this Ms. Gandy!

Thank you so much

Thank you for clarifying this. Excellent explanation.

Thank you for helping me understand the ruling