Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

Публикация

WOW: Jodi Kantor & Adam Liptak have the memos that describe the origins of SCOTUS shadow docket - the 2016 order halting Obama’s Clean Power Plan @jodikantor.bsky.social @adamliptak.bsky.social @nytimes.com www.nytimes.com/2026/04/18/u...

The Inside Story of Five Days That Remade the Supreme Courtwww.nytimes.com
Обсуждение

Ответы

More proof that this “court” is completely illegitimate. I.e. not really a court at all any more. Just some sort of corrupt tribunal.

SKochTUS has long been illegitimate and this further proves it.

Why doesn't Jodi post here though?

This is great they have the memos, we should have access to all the memos. SCOTUS affects and often ruins our lives in secret. Let’s see how they do it and don’t let them own the narrative only with their written opinion. We don’t let Congress do it.

What's particular embarrassing beyond the partisan hackery abd blowing through the applicable standards of review, the level of legal analysis here is pathetic

It is always always about OIL. Every leonard leo pick, every ruling such as Citizen's United, etc is about oil profit. Every president knows this and works within those boundaries, unfortunately.

P

Sure looks like Roberts was in direct collusion with McConnell and his "one-term president" declaration.

SCOTUS judges know the price of everything and the value of nothing. bsky.app/profile/leah...

Leah Litman

WOW: Jodi Kantor & Adam Liptak have the memos that describe the origins of SCOTUS shadow docket - the 2016 order halting Obama’s Clean Power Plan @jodikantor.bsky.social @adamliptak.bsky.social @nytimes.com www.nytimes.com/2026/04/18/u...

Ответ для Navin Pokala 🇺🇸🇺🇦🇨🇦🇬🇱

dissolve the court then expand it and start over.

Ответ для Navin Pokala 🇺🇸🇺🇦🇨🇦🇬🇱

This administration & its accomplices are a major head F🌸🌸🌸! My head can take no more F🌸🌸🌸- Ing‼️ ⚖️🇺🇸 🙏💙👊

Ответ для BornInDaEB 🟦🟧

Thanks for this!

The shadow docket has evolved into the shadow government.

I can't believe it was all bullshit. /s/

Oh. Look. The Conservatives on the Supreme Court are corrupt. Who knew 🙄

Gift link?

Great on Velshi. Thanks for saying how rediculous shadow dockets are.

Big nothing burger - nothing will change.

#BlueCrew #VoteBlue #OneBlue

Yeah. This is great reporting

The continuing metastasis of GOP corruption in SCOTUS. Threat of death to Court and country.

I hate our 'secret' govetnment and its anti-democratic mehodologies.

Roberts has proven time and again to be an arsonist in favor of big business, big money (citizens united), the GOP's culture wars (Dobbs) and the pedo president, and against everyday Americans. Willfully twisting the law to his political whims. Too bad there isn't a hell for him to rot in.

Ответ для fmdtop

Underneath it all: relentless commitment to undoing the Voting Rights Act. The CJ is a stone-cold racist.

Don't put up with "shadow docket." ☎️ 202 224 3121 call Congress 📱 text SIGN PQJHCT to 50409 resist.bot/petitions/PQ...

Impeach & Remove Chief Justice John RobertsJoin 1 people. Impeach & Remove Chief Justice John Roberts I am a voting constituent writing to compel you to immediately impeach and remove Chief Justice John… Sign and Resistbot delivers your letter...resist.bot

Is it new for them to use Mr for a former president?

Ответ для Eve Ettinger

No, they've done that for a long time for current and former presidents.

Ответ для Eve Ettinger

Can confirm from NYT stylebook, all presidents current and former are "President" on first reference (like Obama in the third paragraph here) and Mr. on subsequent references.

free link to 2016 SCOTUS memos in 🪡👇🏼 bsky.app/profile/them...

Themistocles’ Wall🧑🏻‍🦽👩🏽‍🦯‍➡️🧏🏿‍♂️

2 things @jodikantor.bsky.social & @adamliptak.bsky.social story doesn’t mention - after scalia, cynic mitch executed another terrifying power grab, blocking a prez’s chance to name replacement - the 2015 jim crow gop justices all benefited from CO2-blasting $’s👇🏼 @nytimes.com white status edits?

a grown-ass man at the pinnacle of the legal establishment in these allegedly United States saw a Democratic president use his power and had an absolute conniption fit

In the court of history, it will be established beyond a reasonable doubt that the current SCOTUS, led by Roberts, was absolutely corrupted by monied RW interests and is to blame for enabling felon Trump and his various crimes, which virtually destroyed our democracy and planet.

Wow. This is very eye-opening and disturbing, but not surprising. It confirms yet again how freaked out the racist wingnuts were about having a Black president, and that went all the way to SCOTUS.

Is there a reason the NYT is calling President Obama, Mr Obama?

Ответ для M Carbone

convention!

Anyone have the ability to provide a gift link?

Does anyone know if John Roberts has ordered an inquiry into this leak, YET? May be he's busy watching BBC right now. When he comes back to work on Monday, he will!?

butbutbutbut that would mean that, JOHN ROBERTS is a scoundrel, not a PATRIOT??

Holy moly

The problem throughout all 4 estates is the corruption. This is why other democracies have failed - we have joined the trash heap.

If we've learned anything from this specific court, it's that precedent is dead and none of us are constrained by its opinions. Pass whatever laws we want until a later court agrees: That's the jurisprudence conservatives so desperately wanted. We should give it to them good and hard.

Ответ для Accountabilabuddy🔻

Everytime these SCOTUS justices ignore precedent, they claim to be Originalists. IANAL but my opinion is that they are writing "original ideas" & not engaging in the original meaning of the author & time it was written.

Ответ для Accountabilabuddy🔻

Oh man, 1000x this. If there's anything to take away from the Roberts court, it's that they will not ever respect or follow the rule of law. They are wholly illegitimate. And we need to remember that when suddenly it's unconstitutional to hold presidents and their admins accountable

Ending the emergency shadow docket and expanding the court must now become a part of every Dem POTUS candidate’s platform in 2028.

Let the speculation on the source(s)begin or maybe Roberts will cry “fake news”

"Balls and strikes"

Gee its a real mystery.

As if the rightwing Court’s reputation weren’t bad enough …

"The chief justice and some of his colleagues were watching [Obama] warily, concerned the president was going past what the Constitution allowed him to do on his own. " No unitary theory for the Dems, lolz

Ответ для Sweet Bobby

Definitely no unitary theory for Black Dems.

John Roberts’ legacy is of politicizing the Court and losing its legitimacy.

Why are the internal machinations of SCOTUS cloaked in secrecy?

This is a great data point in the justices-are-not-infallible-sages-just-biased-old-coots study. I hate how we all indulge in this pantomime of arguments when this shows they pretty much make up their minds based on vibes, grudges, and mood.

closed chambers we hardly knew ye

R

Is this the Roberts that in a recent interview told people that thinking of judges as partisan or political was dangerous?

It fits of a piece with his apparent belief that racism is a thing of the past and we now need to protect white people from everyone *else* getting equal rights.

Corruption doesn’t begin to describe what this alleged court has become

Ответ для dgarrityvaldeznm

Roberts, Kavanaugh, and ACB all worked on Bush v. Gore. Coincidence? And that was for old-school GOPers, who never thought a monster like Trump would take over their operations. Makes one wonder what Trump/Russia has on the GOP for them to roll over and play dead

What a depressing story. Roberts apparently makes rulings based on how offended he feels & how much something will COST BUSINESSES? Doesn't sound like LAW based decisions to me. What a hypocrite. He later handed the 🍊💩 virtual IMPUNITY. What a pig.

Ответ для Really_Polly ❌👑 "Get Your Booster"
F

Balls and strikes baby.

Ответ для Really_Polly ❌👑 "Get Your Booster"

NYT article: “Mr Obama had been 1 of just 22 senators to vote against Chief Justice Robert’s confirmation in 2005, saying that the nominee had “far more often used his formidable skills on behalf of the strong in opposition to the weak.” “ This reporting proves that Obama was 100% correct.

This is a very weird graf, re Obama and Roberts. How? Because they have different political opinions that supersede meaningless similarities! And was this actually a "puzzle" to anyone?

Ответ для John M. Cunningham

Well, if you subscribe to the theory that all the elitists are on the same team, and their "conflict" is a drama for the peons they manipulate, this would be a mystery. And at the very least the NYT seems to want to be the paper of the elite class consciousness.

Ответ для John M. Cunningham

Easy answer: one of them is a racist and the other is black

Ответ для John M. Cunningham

Serious question: why is this kind of discussion not public, either directly and automatically or via FOIA? The other branches of government are (theoretically) required to be open. What is the justification for allowing this branch to operate utter secrecy? Is there some legitimate reason?

Ответ для Steven Sokol

The arg for secrecy in gov’t *deliberations* is that to get the best outcomes gov’t officials must be free to explore all ideas @ what to do or not to do, w/o fear that the discussions will be made public, leading to mockery, etc. Many parts of U.S. gov’t, not just courts, have that shield.

Ответ для Steven Sokol

the theory behind SCOTUS secrecy, like the concept of executive privilege, has been it encourages honest debate without fear of public exposure FOIA only applies to exec branch roberts has long fought more transparency in the judiciary, which makes all the more sense now

This is AWESOME reporting!

Once again, the fight around democracy features forces for polluting and dangerous energy that would be reined in if we choose to get serious about climate change. The fossil fuel industry has no use for democracy, or clean air or clean water. A bunch of Greedy Ol' Polluters (GOP!)

Have we checked his investments and his billionaires for undue financial influence?

Gift link perhaps?