Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

Публикация

Предыдущая публикация

WOW: Jodi Kantor & Adam Liptak have the memos that describe the origins of SCOTUS shadow docket - the 2016 order halting Obama’s Clean Power Plan @jodikantor.bsky.social @adamliptak.bsky.social @nytimes.com www.nytimes.com/2026/04/18/u...

The Inside Story of Five Days That Remade the Supreme Courtwww.nytimes.com
561,9 тыс.753

If we've learned anything from this specific court, it's that precedent is dead and none of us are constrained by its opinions. Pass whatever laws we want until a later court agrees: That's the jurisprudence conservatives so desperately wanted. We should give it to them good and hard.

Обсуждение

Ответы

Everytime these SCOTUS justices ignore precedent, they claim to be Originalists. IANAL but my opinion is that they are writing "original ideas" & not engaging in the original meaning of the author & time it was written.

Oh man, 1000x this. If there's anything to take away from the Roberts court, it's that they will not ever respect or follow the rule of law. They are wholly illegitimate. And we need to remember that when suddenly it's unconstitutional to hold presidents and their admins accountable