If you're finding yourself on the same side of history as the RIAA, that is a sign to switch to a different side of history at mach speed.
TeefaStrange Bedfellows
An upcoming 'tiel 'tuber exploring some fresh air. Highly sussy, 18+ only
Okay using my monthly allowance of one quote dunk on this. This is vibes-based jurisprudence that puts the Candyland fantasy of what position OP feels authors oughta hold in society over the reality that the law is a blunt instrument, and IP is used mostly to bludgeon artists into poverty.
Big Joeli still just really feel like AI stuff is basically illegal. like I don't think a good faith interpretation of "fair use" entails vacuuming up everyone's intellectual property to build your chat bot. that sounds wrong to me
overstated, but copyright law made destruction the cheapest path to legal certainty, post-Hachette, where the Internet Archive kept originals shelved, lent digital surrogates and lost.
🌻 Psychedelic Mycelia Madoka Magicayes I agree that the AI book shredding thing is very, very bad it is however completely legal, it is their legal alternative to the illegal act of 'making a copy of the book and leaving the original the fuck alone', this destruction of books is a direct consequence of intellectual property law
Fabulous chart showing how the improvements in AI bug finding became visible to project owners which matches what OSS maintainers were telling me in March about the sea change to “still too many but good actually so we can’t ignore them”
daniel:// stenberg://That image of my "AI sentiment" change over time comes from a LinkedIn post by Paul Calhoun […] [Original post on mastodon.social]
To all the responses that are like "But I'm an author AND I support libraries!", I have to say, it's an incredible accomplishment to be an author and also illiterate.
Key 🗝 🦊✅I fully believe that modern authors would be against public libraries if they were proposed today.
It is not an exaggeration to say that AI companies are only destroying books today because of publishing companies’ aggressive lobbying to criminalize the used book market.
CDL: Publishers Against Booksthe Internet Archive lends out books and you'll never guess who got madwww.google.commaia arson crimew 🏴the solution to anthropic ripping up millions of books isnt more copyright by the way, theyre doing this Because of copyright
We need to invent a Youtuber who is smart
Big Joeli still just really feel like AI stuff is basically illegal. like I don't think a good faith interpretation of "fair use" entails vacuuming up everyone's intellectual property to build your chat bot. that sounds wrong to me
I think intellectual property is the dark mirror of immigration law, in that people’s intuitive sense of what existing IP law allows is far more restrictive than the reality while their intuitive sense of what existing immigration law allows is far more permissive than the reality