The only conclusion that can be drawn is that the White House press corps knows and accepts both the appearance and reality of its obeisance
Carl Quintanilla“.. he was met with applause from roughly half the room .. before turning toward new #WHCA president Jacqui Heinrich, who smiled .. and embraced the man who had just spent more than an hour assailing the work of those seated before him.” @passantino.bsky.social www.status.news/p/the-white-...
Social insecurities of media elite that predators like billionaires and even Epstein knew to target Dinner parties keep getting credibly reported as very influential to decisions of NYT editors, Supreme Court justices, Ivies Group chats of them with Rufo, Hanania, Ben Shapiro, Andreesen, Lonsdale:
NYTimes: affirmative action for mediocre editors angry at MeToo"If you weren't in the business you'd think everyone arriving at conclusions independently [they're] not small group who talk to each other between politics and journalism and industries" Leaks of billionaires, their mediocre elite media editors, white men angry at woke MeToo, far-right extremists:
The conclusion to be reached by the public, then, is that the WHCA is now led by people who are not working in the public interest. There are likely correspondents who are trying to serve the public. www.spj.org/spj-code-of-...
SPJ’s Code of EthicsMembers of the Society of Professional Journalists believe that public enlightenment is the forerunner of justice and the foundation of democracy. Ethical journalism strives to ensure the free exchang...www.spj.org
