Yes. It’s not *just* a palace intrigue story about Pirro exposing Trump’s and Burgum’s lies. Pirro continues to lie, and I expect Hearn’s team to exploit that by objecting under Rule 46(a) to Pirro’s proposed “without prejudice” dismissal. bsky.app/profile/will...
Will BrockmanPirro lied not only in the press conference a month ago but also, as @emptywheel.bsky.social points out, in this week’s motion to dismiss the indictment. But Pirro’s lies and Burgum’s lies conflict in ways that improve the chances that Hearn will be able to further expose all of them.