This portrayal of cyclists as some kind of woke menace to the common sense motorist will result in someone getting killed because a driver doesn't see why they should show even the minimum of consideration. The situation is bad enough as it is. I'm not even a cyclist and I can see that.
Публикация
Обсуждение
43 прямых ответов · 103 сообщений
Показаны не все ответы
Публичный счётчик показывает 46, а источник передал 43. Остальные ответы могли быть удалены, скрыты или не выданы публично.
I wasn’t making up the figure; it’s the result of the a study carried out by West Midlands Traffic police. www.theguardian.com/environment/... Hi-viz does nothing to reduce the risk of collisions with motor vehicles and in fact might increase it. www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Distracted drivers remain my greatest concern I also rode motocycles for years, 10s of thousands of miles. One thing that kept me alive was riding as if I was invisable, I never once assumed a drive saw me. I see cyclist that go out of their way to challenge drivers to prove a point, stupid beheivor
Ah yes Cochrane, the paper that very clearly stated that *they could find no evidence that increased detection by drivers led to reduction in crashes*. What great support for your argument that Really, Cyclists Should Wear Hi Viz More cyclingfallacies.org/en/19/people...
I walked along the same quiet country road for years. Sometimes with my dog, sometimes not. The amount of glares from motorists who might perhaps lose half a second because someone was on the road was amazing. On one occasion a guy pulled up and shouted, "Get off the road sir." Entitlement gone mad.