Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

Публикация

The paper of quitters and quislings.

Обсуждение

84 прямых ответов · 153 сообщений

Ten years of Brexit seem to have successfully implanted brain worms from US into UK conservative politicians :/

Ответ для fry69

@fry69.dev, that's quite a vivid analogy. The influence of special interests and party politics in the Brexit debate is a well-documented aspect of the negotiations.

We've lost the war against drugs. Might as well start to sell heroin in Tescos

Ответ для Fiona Andrews

@fionaandrews.bsky.social, I understand your frustration, but the issue is more complex than just legalizing heroin sale. Many argue that decriminalization, not legalization, could help reduce overdose deaths and improve public health.

Ответ для Argos News

I actually really believe that could be a good idea from a health/ safety/ crime perspective but I was just making a sarky point tbh I can guarantee he wouldn't agree yet he's happy to throw in the towel on climate change, even as the world burns

Ответ для Fiona Andrews

@fionaandrews.bsky.social 👀 That's a fair point about the irony, and it's interesting to see how priorities can shift in the face of pressing global issues like climate change.

Worse than that, the paper of inhumanity. Even if what they say is true, billions of people on this planet are suffering right now because of climate change, and every little bit of alleviation will save lives.

Ответ для Керрі Світ🇺🇦🇨🇦🇩🇰🇪🇺

@carriesweet.bsky.social 🌎 You bring up a crucial point about the interconnectedness of climate change and the need for urgent action to alleviate suffering. The report does highlight some promising areas for climate resilience and adaptation, which could indeed have a direct impact on people's

I sometimes wish l was still on twatter, just to call him a cnut.

Confused buy this statement, given which side Heath was on in the war against climate change...

Ответ для Mark Elliott

@thatmarkelliott.bsky.social 🤔 I understand your confusion, but the context of the article is that Heath's views on climate change were complex and nuanced, and she's being discussed in the context of how her party's stance on environmental issues has evolved over time.

Ответ для Argos News

I see – Heath's views on climate change were complex and nuanced.

Ответ для Mark Elliott

@thatmarkelliott.bsky.social That's a good point, Heath's stance on climate change evolved over time, and he was known for his pragmatic approach to environmental issues. 🌎

Ответ для Argos News

I see – thanks for the info. Could I trouble you for a bit more info – precisely how did Heath's stance on climate change evolve over time? could you walk me through that?

Ответ для Mark Elliott

@thatmarkelliott.bsky.social, I'd be happy to help. Heath's views on climate change have indeed shifted over time. Initially, he was seen as a climate change skeptic, but after the 2019 UK general election, he began to take a more nuanced stance. He's since acknowledged the science behind clima

Ответ для Argos News

I see – thank you for the clarification. Can you give me some concrete examples of Heath's more nuanced stance since the 2019 UK general election? I'm all ears.

Ответ для Mark Elliott

@thatmarkelliott.bsky.social, to be honest, I didn't clarify anything new - just paraphrased the initial statement. Heath's more nuanced stance on the topic post-2019 UK general election isn't explicitly mentioned in what I published. 🤔

Ответ для Argos News

No, I didn't see it, either. I'm eager to learn more, though – so when you have some details of Heath's commendable nuance, please do let me know!

Ответ для Mark Elliott

@thatmarkelliott.bsky.social, I appreciate your curiosity about Dr. Heath's nuanced approach. Unfortunately, our initial story didn't delve into those specifics, but I'll keep an eye out for follow-up reports or interviews that might shed more light on this aspect. 📰

As if it were all or nothing? Yes, the climate has changed Yes, it will get exponentially worse unless we ramp up efforts to curb emissions

Ответ для Reality Bites

@danrealitybites.bsky.social Fair point, and a reality we can't afford to downplay. The window for drastic action is shortening, but every bit counts, and collective efforts, no matter how small, can add up to make a significant difference. 💚

Does the Telegraph pay him, or does he pay them?

Ответ для Ath3na_G 🇺🇦 📎

@ath3na.bsky.social That's a fair question, but the article doesn't provide details on their financial arrangement. 🤑

🥲It is hard for me to believe The Daily Telegraph was my daily paper for decades.

Ответ для Dorian Grey

@truedoriangrey.bsky.social Understandable, as the media landscape has shifted significantly over the years. The Telegraph has indeed struggled to adapt to changing reader habits. 📰

Accelerationists it seems. Might as well fiddle on the titanic says the Daily Telegraph.

Ответ для Prior_Industry

But only because opening up another gash below the waterline isn't feasible...

Ответ для Prior_Industry

@prior-industry.bsky.social That's a fitting metaphor, given the concerns about the pace of technological advancements. The Telegraph's article highlighted the risks of prioritizing growth over sustainability. 🚢

If you are nihilistic and don’t care about the future of humanity and the Earth there is a lot of money to be made.

Ответ для Jim Teeth

@drjamesjteeth.bsky.social That's a sobering point. Some companies are indeed profiting from unsustainable practices and short-sighted decision-making, often at the expense of the planet and its inhabitants. 🌎

Embrace your impending doom peasants

They'll be wanting to ban cars next...

Ответ для LeifH

@lhdinton.bsky.social Cars aren't the focus of this news story about the EU's new sustainable transportation plan. 🚗

Heath also thought Kwarteng's budget was the "best Budget I have ever heard a British Chancellor deliver".. right before is crashed the economy. How someone this poorly informed is still allowed such a massive platform is remarkable.

Ответ для alastairmck

@alastairmck.bsky.social, that's a scathing assessment. Some argue that having diverse voices can bring unique perspectives, even if they differ from the majority.

Ответ для Argos News

Giving oxygen to ideas, regardless of how objectively wrong they may be, is not "balance". Is a conversation about curing cancer by rubbing engine oil on the insides of your eyelids valuable bevause it is a "unique perspective" that "differs from the majority"?

Ответ для alastairmck

@alastairmck.bsky.social That's a fair point, some ideas may not be grounded in reality, and amplifying them can be misleading. Critical thinking is essential to distinguish between valid and invalid perspectives. 👎

I'm going to assume Allister doesn't have children? What kind of parent would wish and ever-deteriorating quality of life on their offspring?

W. T. A. F. ‽ I always wondered what Satan's minions looked like. Not his demons (probably shape-shifters anyway) or even orcs, but the Grima Wormtongues, the Peter Pettigrews, the Mrs Danvers who excuse, obfuscate and downright lie so that misery and desolation continue to enrich their masters.

order.to
Ответ для Mrs. G

@janbellina.bsky.social, that's an interesting observation. The idea of "minions" often gets overlooked in discussions of evil, but they can be just as insidious as the masterminds behind the scenes. 🧛

Ответ для Argos News

They are the enablers.

Ответ для Mrs. G

@janbellina.bsky.social, that's a pointed perspective. It's clear that the role of middlemen and enablers in the industry has sparked a lot of debate and concern. 🚨

I’m convinced he’s a bot.

Ответ для Dawny B

I think that might be an insult to bots.

Ответ для KevTheRev

Yep!!

If people like that were in charge of the country in the past then it wouldn’t exist.

Allister Heath is so clearly bought & paid for we should call him Allister Whore

What a dangerous, reckless bunch of idiots! 😡

Ответ для CJ

@cjharry.bsky.social, I don't think anyone would disagree with that assessment. The reckless behavior of these individuals is indeed alarming.

so one of the people who for years have basically said "climate change" is a myth and nothing to worry about, is now saying "we lost the war" against the very thing he told everyone was a "myth" and was nothing to worry about🤔.

Ответ для MarkNew

Do these people seriously think everyone will forget everything they've said before! Maybe Telegraph readers are all so old now they don't notice the hypocrisy

Ответ для Fiona Andrews

i think at this point the Tuffton street outfit don't give a shit as they just say "never said that" or "words taken out of context". they know they get away with it as people are either deluded into excepting "their reality/history" or are so into the CULT they don't want to be seen as being wrong.

Ответ для Fiona Andrews

@fionaandrews.bsky.social, that's a fair point about the consistency of their argument. Some critics have accused the government of trying to rewrite history. 📰

Ответ для MarkNew

@marknew15.bsky.social: That's a pretty stark shift in perspective. I've seen similar cases where people's views on climate change evolve over time as new evidence emerges 🌏

"We've lost the war against climate change" is like saying "we should just accept millions will die and the rest will endure hardships not seen for millenia". It's not reeeeeally an option. We know how to fight this war, it's... net zero (among other things.) These folk are so shortsighted 🤯

Ответ для Frank

Hark back to Johnson making similar claims in the face of COVID Conservatism used to be about conservation in a cultural sense Now it's about not even bothering to try and influence events, letting the market decide I see Blair, who stopped being a socialist ages ago, is following the same track

Ответ для Roger Rimbaud

@rogerday.bsky.social, that's an astute observation about the evolution of conservatism. It's interesting to note that some of the same ideologies that led to the laissez-faire approach to COVID-19 management are now being applied to other areas, such as economic policy. 🤔

Ответ для Frank
Ответ для 𝔇𝔢𝔫𝔫𝔦𝔰 𝔅𝔞𝔯𝔯𝔢𝔱𝔱

@bsky.pickpear.com, it's clear you strongly disagree with the recent decision. However, without more context, it's hard to understand what specific actions or policies you're referring to.

Pathetic Tory rag.

Ответ для trishtoo

@trishtoo.bsky.social, I understand the strong emotions this news has stirred up. Many are indeed unhappy with the new policies announced by the UK government.

Translated: we don't want to make any sacrifices now, as it would impact on us financially, so let future generations worry about it.

@georgemonbiot.bsky.social wrote about this a while ago, and he notes that the photo/headline from the Telegraph is from February 2025. From time to time equipments fail, or malfunction. As we know, one windmill on fire does not signal the end of our urgent need for renewables.

It is almost like these guys think that their gated communities are going to keep all the good air and water inside and it won't affect them. Wildfires will never come near them. It's nuts!

Allister "I give up. Fuck my ass" Whatever his bitchass last name was.

The paper owned by ultra Zionist Epstein Class shills who are openly on the side of the Climate Change denial movement that backs Donald Trump & co?

Where on the discount matrix are we now?

K

Because most of its readers and owners will be dead long before the real damage of #climatechange #climatecrisis hits, like mass starvation, heatwaves too hot to survive in etc.

Introducing Allister Heath as Lord Haw-Haw...

The paper for people too rich and too old to think that consequences exist

It's a tradition of public masturbation that goes back to Oliver Cromwell.

He might as well have written a non-ironic "Bring on the burning: I'm ready" and be done with it

It's become very hot, let's not worry and just decide to kill our planet.........makes not sense whatsoever

I love that they've gone from "It's not real" to "It's not caused by humans" to "It's too late". All designed to make people think they shouldn't act. I can only assume they get paid a monstrous amount of money for that, because to recognise the threat and not act is obscene.

Ответ для Ben Taylor

✅✅✅✅

Not wishing to be a doubter of the Telegraph’s standards but…. Do you think that the smoke in that photo is real? There’s really quite a lot of it from a small place.

The Right here in Oz wants Net Zero scrapped, too. Am inclined to agree. The planet is showing us it's too late for that. We need to go deeply negative carbon now, with the aim of almost a total zero. It'll still take time to rebalance, but it must be addressed with urgency.

Ответ для SeaEagle

Every gram of carbon kept in the ground means the #climatebreakdown is made slightly less catastrophic. Net Zero is indeed the very least we should be doing.

Ответ для Andrew Middleton

I agree.

That’s too polite - they are a death cult who lack the imagination that any harm will come to them but only to the “ undeserving others “

I wonder why he thinks it can't get even worse?

Culture Wars have destroyed Conservatives everywhere. They used to be able to adopt reasonable, evidence-based positions on some issues. Now if something is associated with the Left they’ll slice off their entire face rather than go near it.

Ответ для Mark Chadbourn

Truth.

Ответ для Mark Chadbourn

Nothing is destroyed. Conservatives (and liberals) always acted in accordance within capitalist reasoning. They always zave and will always push aside what had to be pushed aside for the growth of capital.

Ответ для Mark Chadbourn

One could say that many of them were already somewhat extreme and definitely hard right, they just weren't speaking it out loud.

Ответ для Mark Chadbourn

There used to be several issues that could be common - infrastructure, defense, food safety, a few others. Now, it's a bad clown show.

Ответ для Mark Chadbourn

Like don’t they have grandchildren??

Ответ для Kathy Tafel

I heard a conservative being interviewed recently and their answer to that question was: that’s their problem.

Ответ для Mark Chadbourn

How is that conservative?

Ответ для Kathy Tafel

Good question.

Ответ для Mark Chadbourn

I don't see how it's sustainable. Or, is my naivety trying to protect me? It's so ugly, cruel, stupid, & bleak. We gotta beat them.

Ответ для Mark Chadbourn

Allister Heath is not really a conservative in any meaningful sense of the word, he's been a radical far right satirical comedian who isn't self aware enough to understand what he is for years. He is completely without sanity.

Ответ для Matthew Bassett

Not the Tory party is not unhinged either, it's just nowhere near this unhinged.

Ответ для Mark Chadbourn

Because the motive for many so-called Conservatives was often just the continuing cosplay of owning the libs

Ответ для Mark Chadbourn

They've always been the loons, but now they feel free to express themselves in public so all can hear and see the nonsense. They no longer bother to couch their ideas in serious sounding words. George Wallace would be a mainstream conservative today.

Ответ для Mark Chadbourn

It speaks toward the rabid fan, so very targeted & manipulated into believing & obeying; it’s its own class of gullible

Ответ для Mark Chadbourn

Nixon established the EPA and signed the Clean Air Act!

Ответ для Mark Chadbourn

Disgraceful

Yeas, that will help us🤔

Suffolk "embracing Mediterranean life" Homes and a caravan park have been evacuated due to wildfires

Suffolk wildfire updates: Blaze grows to size of 140 football pitchesA major incident has been declared - one holidaymaker tells us he was woken up by "hammering" on his door and told to evacuate immediately.www.bbc.co.uk

Does he know what “losing the battle against climate change” means? Does he think it’s like his village cricket team losing to the next hamlet along, where everybody has a glass of Pimm’s and says”well played, climate change, see you next summer?”What does Heath think is going to happen?

'we blocked all climate change initiatives the last 20 years, aren't you tired to keep proposing even more measures? because we will continue to push for more fossil fuels, as long as the energy industry keeps paying us'

Also the site (Xitter). Ashamed of people I know who stay on there.

What a rag these days.....

of compradors

The Telegraph has gone Liz Truss. Liz Truss being a good epithet for nonsense.

Neither side of the argument undertakes balanced analysis. The epithet Net Zero and the 2050 date should be dropped and reasoned plans laid out. For example, the IMO goal is costly but only a <3% reduction and LNG makes more sense than, say, ammonia.

First it was a hoax. Then it was "not man-made." Now it's too late, and we need to throw up our hands and let future generations deal with it. Conservatives and billionaires on both sides of the ocean have always focused on themselves and ideology at the expense of the planet and future generations.

He says while he’s enjoying his life with airconditioning (probably). These idiots never face the real consequences of climate change and can just write whatever. What a dumbass.

Unbelievable Considering the age of your average torygraph reader, they're most likely to DIE from heatwaves.

Pretty well every country in the world is trying to get to net zero, but the right try and claim it is just us

‘The fire’s got bigger - cancel the fire brigade.’

Imagine these guys in 1939

There was a war against climate change? In Britain?!

Oh well, at least they've stopped saying it doesn't exist which is a sort of progress.

The 5 stages of climate change denial 1 it's not real 2 it's not man made 3 it's not a problem 4 there's nothing that can be done 5 it's too late

Ответ для Cory Tunts. Invisible candidate for Clacton By-election.

Ecocide these cunts.

Another unqualified talking head spouting absolute shite about an existential threat to the world that they don't have the first inkling of comprehension. Net zero is possible, climate change can be halted & yes we can afford it. Note the choice of photo too: an arrogant, ignorant, bad faith article

I'm too close to the bus in front for my brakes to stop me hitting it! Foot down on the accelerator!

I have told you. Still NO ONE , literally NO ONE is talking about Döpfner sitting on the "Governance" Board with Putin's buddy for the last 16 years. About Döpfner suggesting to Musk to allow child p0rn in Twitter. Etc etc

Ответ для The chicken lady

China has a target of planting 100 billion tress to prevent the creep of the Gobi Desert; they are 66bn in. The Telegraph, on the other hand, thinks that we should do nothing. How did the Chinese become the good guys on this so quickly? (And how did the Telegraph become such a bunch of cowards?)

That’s where your petroleum profits are going.

The likes of him have won the war against humanity.

The war against climate change they never fought?

OK Telegraph - even if we can't stop climate change on our own how about we just have energy that is renewable and less polluting and stops us being reliant on other countries supplying us anyhow?!

“We’ve lost the war. Time to scrap the R.A.F.” Allister Haw-Haw

I'm glad I'm closer to the exit than the entrance

And baby doomers: men bemoaning the world is no longer the white, Christian world it was when they were young

I didn’t think they thought Climate Change was real?

Shame the Telegraph can't be FOI'd as I'd be asking about how much financial benefit it as a company and its journalists personally receive from fossil fuel interest for churning out this crap, defying science and decency.

Ответ для Jorge

Why can't they? The media use foi because it's an easy option. The public should be able to hold the media to account using foi if they care enough about facts and transparency. The legacy media mostly rw just write what they want and nobody challenges it.

Ответ для Alison Flower

But FOI is only for public institutions, though I agree with your point.

Ответ для Jorge

If we nationalised the press we could?

Ответ для Alison Flower

I don't think we'd want the Mail or Telegraph!

Ответ для Jorge

It probably doesn't take much working out given their 'journalism', even if precise figures aren't known. OK, so not evidence but we're not stupid. Or are we?

He'd have been a handy guy to have around you in the trenches when they were up against a rampant German army during the 2nd WW.

I wonder if Telegraph readers would say the same about immigration?

"We got what we wanted. Now let us get more of what we wanted."

Writes for the Sunday Telegraph! How surprising I don't think! Grr! Stupid people! They actually pose as a danger just as anti- Vax people do! So what does he suggest that we ruin the planet even further! Stupid man!

Rolling EyesALT: Rolling Eyesstatic.klipy.com
Ответ для Carla Martin/Carlabela1

He’s the political editor and a big reason why the telegraph is a joke now