Профиль

Well we don't have coal mines any more but we do have care homes. What do you suggest, we restrict access to art and culture so more people will have no choice but to work in the arse wiping factory?

We have a very good idea what he's going to do because he appointed Healy to the chancellorship and kept Mahmood at the home office. Are we simply not allowed to look at the information in front of us until an embargo has been lifted or what?

He thus starts exactly as Starmer did. He *fails* to grasp the enormity of what's in front of him, and *fails* once again to grasp that these people cannot be appeased. Or, he deeply believes the solution to Britain's problems are cutting welfare for American bombs.

But this is the point, is it not? On the big questions, he has already conceded to the Right, to absolutely no effect - they are still going to treat him like a communist. His answers to "the big questions" are "change nothing substantive, try slightly different tweaks."

the govt loves to provide useless busywork and pretend it’s going to get you into a job

in the early 2000s the jobcentre were always sending me on basic bitch IT courses, but job postings were always asking for people who could use Excel. I once asked if they could send me on an Excel course instead and he was like lol are you kidding, they cost a fortune

"Give him more than a week" say the people who have not been segregated from society, while he rolls out even more anti-trans policies and gives positions of power to people who hate us.

there is a point at which being a fool becomes accomplice to corrupt villainy and I am very unforgiving at where that line is

there's the principle of charity and there's being a mark and if trying to sort out the difference in practice scares you then I've got an amazing investment opportunity for you

related to another bizarre feature of political discussion in the US: that it's supposed to mark you as reasonable/bipartisan/fair or whatever that you take these discourses on their own terms. as opposed to marking you as (at best!) a mark

Yes. And also employers have to train entry level staff. It's a cost, suck it up. You are not going to get somebody walking through the door who knows all your processes and quirks. You want more of those people? Well, put some effort into retention then.

I mean the plain reading of what he's doing is that he intends to further gut welfare and put it into defense. This is an objectively right wing position.

Education should be available for anyone who wants it for any reason at any time. You should need no more reason to go study the works of Homer or Jeanette Winterson or James Baldwin than "I want to."

This is it, isn't it?

The real irony here is we're seeing the inability of people who love serious director man's book adaptation to properly read and engage with a text. This is *literally the conclusion* of the review they're yelling about.

"courses like AI" is definitely the sign of a real plan with lots of detail in it.

“If immigration hadn't picked up my brother, my sister-in-law would still be alive, and the children wouldn't be going through this sorrow,” he said. “Unfortunately, immigration — the [U.S.] government — doesn't see that. It makes no difference to them.” www.stlpr.org/law-order/20...

Education isn't about getting a job.

We did not used to be like this. We used to recognise that someone could work down a coal mine and still come home to read and learn.