Профиль

Also a perjurer? "When pressed about the phrase “new leadership,” Jiang told the court, 'I don’t know what ChatGPT does.'"

Also omg she used to be a Facebook eng. talk about zero excuses lazy as fuck

We've found someone even more clueless than the lawyers who turn in briefs with case citations they haven't even bothered to verify exist

You don’t want hands free driving, you want trains. You want trains you want trains you want TRAINS

Law professors are significantly overestimating the capability of generative AI which is leading to some incredibly strange discourse. The take that we need to upend open book / take home exams because students are paying for fancy models is wrong. 🧵

Oh god if this reporting is true, Trump has drunk all of RFK’s kool-aid and now is doubling down on it? We’re doomed www.wsj.com/politics/pol...

Judging by online, a lot of laypeople are learning about the insane border search doctrine at the moment. Which it didn't take someone catching charges for wiping their phone to do it

The answer is always no, because the ask from the Trump Administration will always be poorly reasoned, often poorly lawyered, sometimes illegal, and usually anti-constitutional. Your agreement places other institutions at risk, and you will end up like the restaurant owner in Goodfellas.

generally when you're in a war with a foreign nation, you want to at least pretend to do the "we're here to liberate the people of iran from their tyrannical dictators" thing and not the "we're here to steal all their natural resources and loot them" thing

Yes, my titles are singlehandedly trying to bring back the Reconstruction Era.

The New York Times wouldn't let me write about the Age of Diarrhea so I had to do it myself.

I rarely like any NYT op-ed not written by @jamellebouie.net --- but I'll make a probably controversial exception for this one. "This is a dangerous tool and you need some maturity to use it" seems like a healthy perspective on AI www.nytimes.com/2026/07/27/o...

bsky.app/profile/gowd...

Was he? Yikes, I take it back...

I certainly wouldn't propose to implement the division just like that---but we can draw principled divisions that connect the areas where corporate rights are limited to the dangers posed by their distinctive properties of wealth aggregation (which immediately overrules Buckley, of course the point)

And also we have a model for that. Nonprofits don't get the same political rights

Tommy Lasorda is spinning in his grave

Yeah, in particular corporations could easily be granted property/economic rights but not personal/political rights

Blog Post: Announcing the 2026 Edition of My Internet Law Casebook blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/202...

(that downside being the extreme "it's who you know" access economy to things like plumb clerkships.) much harder problem for schools where "class rank" is a real thing that matters