Профиль

The paper of quitters and quislings.

At 2 billion people on the planet, the rate of CO2 absorption is much higher than at 8.5 billion.

As I said, look again at your own graph with China being added 200 years later. And the U.K. CO2 emissions from 1750 have been absorbed a long time ago… The question is what do we do now and why praise China for the disaster they were AWARE they are contributing to?

I disagree with the premise as your own graph includes China 200 years later. How were they warming their homes? Anyway, we are where we are and today the biggest issue is China.

Per head is similar to US, but 3 times higher vs the EU. And with regards to UK, we all but phased out coal with 0.05% of China’s consumption.

As you maybe have noticed, China was included in that graph 200 years after the U.K. was included… but ok

100 year ago the world population was 2 billion. Today is 8.5 billion. As a world, we started to realise the impact on climate change is real some 50 years ago. And what is China doing?

That’s simply false. Last year’s numbers are: China: 34% of global emissions US: 12% EU: 6%

Look at the graph below. It’s a scandal but somehow we are praising China?

Romania Internet speed is more than twice that of the U.K.

Romania Internet speed is also more than twice that in the U.K.

I do not trust the numbers on Badenoch to be honest, I think is something wrong there.

I still struggle to understand how come we have 20,000+ care sector vacancies in London and yet we have London boroughs with 8-9% unemployment.

Unfortunately Mark, Pervert Glasses is now the official brand.

Badenoch above Davey? In what world?

Again, 6 times higher than the US and 12 higher than the EU. You can dress it any way you want, but China’s use of coal is criminal.

Why don’t you say Russia?

That’s more than 1,000 miles away from Ukraine

China burns 12 times more coal per year than the EU… 12 TIMES MORE!

2/2 This is 6 times more than the US and 12 times more than the EU.