Публикация

NEW: 9th Cir denies rehearing en banc in a facial Second Amendment challenge to CA's switchblade regulations. Unsurprisingly, VanDyke has a dissent that is a tantrum. Delusionally, he thinks Bruen is quite clear! Thanks for the hate-cite, though, I guess 🤷‍♂️ cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/op...

Обсуждение

Ответы

Megan Walsh

17 июл., 06:05

He at least spelled your name correctly in your hate cite. Brannon didn't even get that.

Ответ для Megan Walsh

Jake Charles

17 июл., 06:17

Oof good call. Also hilarious he accuses Brannon and Glenn Reynolds of hostility toward the 2A!

Jerry Edwards

17 июл., 05:44

Surprised he didn't film a video of himself waiving around a switchblade and then stabbing a print of your article.

smouritsen

17 июл., 08:03

Text, history, and tradition all agree that the founding fathers would switchblade a MFer.

Heidi Li Feldman

17 июл., 06:27

Hate cite! Perfect.

Matt

17 июл., 08:14

what a badly-written screed. just embarrassing.

Ответ для Matt

Matt

17 июл., 08:17

"murdered a small forest of trees with myriad pages of dense and opaque analysis." i mean blech

Evan Bernick, a finite mode with a smol hooman and a lorg floof

17 июл., 06:06

That second sentence is an impeachable offense.

❀°。Der Siebenschläfer *.ﾟ✿ ⋆

16 июл., 21:28

That opinion re denial of rehearing has an awful lot of discussion of "dirk knives" and an unfortunately lack of cite to this 2018 district court decision that bans on nunchuks violate the 2nd amendment scholar.google.com/scholar_case...

scholar.google.com

sma-rtguy69

16 июл., 22:33

Will you be doing a thread on his "tantrum"?