It’s one thing that the Atlantic runs essays with a point of view with which I disagree, it’s another to pretend to offer provocative intelligent arguments but actually run shoddy, poorly researched work www.theatlantic.com/magazine/202...
Ok this too is embarrassing for several reasons 1) “irreparable harm“ is a legal term-of-art, not just ordinary English 2) the injunction was interim 3) BC repealed the provincial law in Nov. 2024 bc it *was redundant in view of changes to Canada federal law* which banned open use near parks etc.