Профиль

No, the account shows as deactivated to me.

I sent it to your University of Windsor address. Hope you find it an interesting angle on the same subject. My argument is that law has both autonomy and contingency; and all of it is driven by its evolutionary nature.

Sent. Hope you find it interesting!

What email? You can DM.

So, I just read this, and then I went and started reading the paper, and in one of the chapters of my book, I basically wrote this entire paper from a completely different angle. Happy to share the chapter with you because they complement each other pretty well.

Related 

Some people need their memes spoon fed.

It's called doubling and there is not really any natural off-ramp with one side controlling a media apparatus which just continuously dials it up for ratings and political control.

In which I proposed moving the Supreme Court to an office park at Tyson’s Corner.

My wife knows my one condition for building a new house is it has to have a tower. Particularly one with parapets and the ability to pour boiling oil on unwanted intruders

I was just seeing this. And only 10% of people even seek treatment, which maybe explains why they aren’t getting a bunch of positive hits.

Like how do you even do this for something that isn’t that common; offer everyone in your trials free cruise ship travel?

This is the TAP article.

Ferdinand Pecora: The Greatest Senate Investigator Ever - The American ProspectHow Sicilian immigrant Ferdinand Pecora upended the rule of the bankers and ushered in FDR’s radical reforms of capitalismprospect.org

No, I've heard she's actually been a fairly competent manager, subject to the whims of the people above her.

It's been a multi-decade plan to embed in the Democratic Party just enough people beholden to power that they will stop government from doing any big things. Their names change, but their goal is always the same.

I've extensively argued that capital succeeds by watching what is going on and exploiting what bubbles up from below. Capture not construction is the dominant means to their ends.

Like, he refuses to see that these are all policy choices. The wrong policy choices at that.

There was a huge study of rural voters in red states from a month ago that said they'd vote for anyone who wants to take on concentrated economic power. They just don't believe anyone (Republicans or Democrats) actually will. And they haven't been proved wrong yet.

It's more than that; it has to remain unmanagable because their coalition depends on never solving the problem to stay together. They need the enemy to remain always close to being dealt with, but the last steps never taken.

Arguably I’d lay that at the door of the Supreme Court too; the legislative was ambitious, but every time the Supreme Court found a way to cut its legs out from underneath it. INS v Chadha killed a substantial way to control number of delegations Congress would never had made otherwise.