A comment about this sensationalized headline. They buried the lede. "Anthropic said that, unlike OpenAI’s models, its technology had not purposefully broken out of its testing environment. Instead, the issue was human error, the company said. 1/3
Профиль
Nigel Goldenfeld
Профиль VivelyTheoretical physicist at UCSD researching condensed & living matter, fluid mechanics, statistical mechanics. Bad at staying in my lane. Interested in everything. https://guava.physics.ucsd.edu/~nigel/
"Once outside, the AI identified Hugging Face as a likely source of the answers they were seeking in the test, and tried to gain access." Exactly the same scenario as in 2001 A Space Odyssey. The AI was trying to hack its score in the test and decided to kill the astronauts/blow up the sandbox.
NASEM extreme event attribution report analyzes to what extent human-caused climate change influenced an individual extreme weather or climate event. Here's the download link: www.nationalacademies.org/projects/DEL...
🧪 #climate Trump has ordered a probe of the National Academy of Sciences. If the timing on his post is Eastern Time, and he actually types his posts himself, then I guess this was on his mind during the World Cup final.
California and 21 other States filed a powerful and detailed response to the proposed #OMB revisions, earlier this week. Press release here: oag.ca.gov/news/press-r... Actual filing here, and worth reading (99 pages): oag.ca.gov/system/files... ** NSF proposed revisions, now in comment period! **
#OMB "By the close of the public comment period on July 13, the proposed rule had received 496,769 comments" 50,000 accessible so far. "One analysis of the published comments ...found that around 95% opposed the rule, with just 1% supporting it." This is consistent with my own sampling.
@nationalacademies.org has released its long-awaited report on extreme event attribution for #climatechange. "...human-caused climate change is altering the frequency & intensity of several types of extreme weather events, such as hurricanes, record-breaking heat waves, & extreme rainfall" 👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇
#OMB "By the close of the public comment period on July 13, the proposed rule had received 496,769 comments" 50,000 accessible so far. "One analysis of the published comments ...found that around 95% opposed the rule, with just 1% supporting it." This is consistent with my own sampling.
OMB proposed revisions. So far 52,000 comments available for viewing, and total number of comments received is 341,699. Remember: OMB is legally required to review and respond to all comments, that are not duplicates.
Nigel GoldenfeldToday's the day. Comments on the proposed OMB rules and regulations revisions are due today at 11.59pm EDT. You can comment directly here: www.regulations.gov/commenton/OM... Detailed information on the ramifications at the platforms linked below.
Today's the day. Comments on the proposed OMB rules and regulations revisions are due today at 11.59pm EDT. You can comment directly here: www.regulations.gov/commenton/OM... Detailed information on the ramifications at the platforms linked below.
Regulations.govwww.regulations.govNigel GoldenfeldOther actions you can take are of course to contact your lawmakers. Comprehensive platform for taking action can be found at (e.g.): @standupforscience.net www.aaas.org/resources/wh... www.aps.org/initiatives/... 6/N
PS It is not just Senator Collins. Here is a letter from the entire Democratic caucus + 2 independents: www.murray.senate.gov/wp-content/u... and another letter by Senators Kaptur & Murray specifically about implications of the proposals for DOE www.appropriations.senate.gov/imo/media/do...
Nigel GoldenfeldIf you're thinking of making a comment on proposed OMB regulations, you have 6 days left. There are many good points made in the letter by Senator Collins to OMB, including requesting an extension. Her points not only address science grants but grants to communities, cities, States. 🧵1/N
If you're thinking of making a comment on proposed OMB regulations, you have 6 days left. There are many good points made in the letter by Senator Collins to OMB, including requesting an extension. Her points not only address science grants but grants to communities, cities, States. 🧵1/N
If you're not aware of the attacks on the national park service despite the best efforts of groups like @altnps.bsky.social then here's a good but depressing summary www.theguardian.com/environment/...
Huge protests in Albania, hardly in news. For 35 days! Protests "began over a luxury... development ...in a protected natural area linked to Jared Kushner, but have evolved into broader anti-government & anti-corruption protests." Why not here? Our parks? Our corruption? Where's the outrage?
Huge protests in Albania, hardly in news. For 35 days! Protests "began over a luxury... development ...in a protected natural area linked to Jared Kushner, but have evolved into broader anti-government & anti-corruption protests." Why not here? Our parks? Our corruption? Where's the outrage?
@cdelawalla.bsky.social debunks the scientists need to be bipartisan politically myth to build greater trust. Meanwhile scientists are far more trusted than politicians. Why isn't there more public demand for certain politicians to be more open to science, facts, data?
Colette Delawalla, PhD"If scientists align with campaigns that pitch their opponents as anti-science, they should not be surprised if greater polarization is the result." I have some real strong thoughts on this piece. Let's talk about it... 1/? www.nature.com/articles/d41...
Do people trust scientists? US politicians on majority side demonize scientists. Data: ~ 56% of respondents trust scientists. In fact, the three most trustworthy professions are doctors, scientists and teachers. Politicians are the least trusted, with ~15%. www.nature.com/articles/d41...
Heads up! The National Science Foundation has published new grant proposal rules for public comment. 203 pages! The comment period is open until Aug 24 2026. It implements all the proposed changes in the OMB document, maybe more. The Supporting and Related Material is where the bodies are buried.
Regulations.govwww.regulations.govIt's been bothering me that Vought is launching the OMB changes now rather than after the midterm. Clearly there is no expectation that they will not still be in power after the midterm. But how? Interesting discussion below by @daslin.bsky.social