Профиль

In case any of y'all find yourselves at one of my talks in the future, I think the best question you could ask me is: "Your project [career/argument/etc] seems to have the momentum of a runaway freight train. How do you explain your success?"

It'd probably be instructive to compare the reception of Mortal Kombat 2 to Nolan's Odyssey since they're both adaptations of beloved epic stories featuring complicated men--Johnny Cage and Odysseus, respectively--who go to hell.

This isn't fair. Sometimes we share observations about tables.

Near the Canadian border and just heard BC's 96.9 (nice) say they were broadcasting from unceded territory before playing Tiffany then ZZ Top, and honestly, while Jack FM isn't the last place I'd expect to do a land acknowledgement, it's not the first place I'd expect either.

My honeycrisp foretold the Philly decision.

I need some emergency NBA podcasts stat.

A necessary but not sufficient condition for academics, especially philosophers, to gain back the public's trust is for them to start listing all the facts they know with certainty while also admitting that they don't really know what a proper analysis of those facts might entail.

I'm really loving how they're building out the backstory of Roku City after the recent software update.

Since the question 'Is that a hand or a finger?' makes sense to ask--especially in the context of a philosophy lecture--G.E. Moore cannot be said to know that either of his hands exist with certainty, and thus his proof of an external world fails.

It seems to me that a better title for Carnap's "The Elimination of Metaphysics Through Logical Analysis of Language" would have been "The Silencing of Heidegger's Free Speech Through Logical Analysis of Language."

Leibniz invented management science too?!

[Philosophy conference talk] Me: [chanting] tables, tables- Audience: tables, TABLES Session chair: [pounding her clipboard] TABLES, TABLES, TABLES!

My wife, who played and understands soccer, thinks my idea for an always-offsides defense is unworkable, but I refuse to give up on the idea.

The Professor from AND1 not only had that ball on a string, but he was also one of the youngest full professors of all time.

I had the pleasure of reviewing a new collection of Susan Stebbing's papers edited by Siobhan Chapman for Mind. There's some #HOPOS in the review, and a short section about public philosophy in the history of analytic philosophy. academic.oup.com/mind/advance...

Susan Stebbing: Philosophical Papers, by Susan StebbingIn a short period of time, Susan Stebbing has gone from being relatively neglected in the history of analytic philosophy to being recognized as one of analacademic.oup.com

Man. I just don't know if you tried to fulfill your duty as a scholar to understand things if you're outsourcing your understanding to AI and a bunch of paid researchers. Try harder.

"We [1] did a fair amount of research..." [1] To clarify, 'we' doesn't refer to the report's authors, but AI methods and a bunch of people hired with someone else's money.

I would have also expected to see "C - Question makes no sense" as a possible option!

Taking this prompt seriously for a second to say that any answer other than Bishop and Trout's "The Pathologies of Standard Analytic Epistemology" is wrong.

Same. I take pride in preserving old, soon-to-be-forgotten practices by handcrafting reference lists that are small-batch, artisanal works of art that automated journal citation managers then mangle beyond all recognition.