Профиль

This is extremely bad even for the UK. Even if this gets dropped (which if anything still even remotely functions in our legal system it will), this is sheer intimidation against prospective lawyers deciding whether or not to take jobs defending people being politically persecuted in this country.

My frustration with the burrito taxi discourse is a) this was observable, when food banks report record usage across the country you know something is wrong and b) it was explainable, we ended COVID era affordability policies and Joe Manchin killed the “human infrastructure” element of BBB

www.ms.now/opinion/comm...

People on twitter will really be like "You believe in helping people? That pales in comparison to my strategy, shilling a fascist-aligned gambling app" and then shill a fascist-aligned gambling app

"there's an industry of fabricated sexual assault claims" is 100% indistinguishable from gay frogs 5g activating the vaccine chips shit

Michael Tracey just reading the tweet over and over in befuddlement "what does her not consenting have to do with sexual assault?"

oh no someone wants to take over the democratic party

Repeat for every other kind of republican. Yeah, there's a Pro IVF pro abortion nazi out there, but he's going to keep voting for the GOP because he's a fucking nazi!

This is one of those things that's true but meaningless. The average Republican is: 1) pro IVF but doesn't care. 2) likes abortion, but doesn't care. 3) supports immigrants, but doesn't care. 4) Wants to own a Tank and will vote for the GOP lockstep forever but this is the only issue they care

What if the actually childish thing is believing that nothing can ever change.

It's always funny when someone is like "yes obviously the thing is bad, but you have to spend 100% of your time lying and pretending you think it's good until people spontaneously all hate the bad thing" No, you have to actually make a case for why it's bad to change things.

Does the candidate for Senate who has benefited from $46M from AIPAC for her campaign -Support US recognition of Palestine? No. -Support an end to taxpayer FMF to Israel? No. -Support an end to US diplomatic veto at the UN? No -Support sanctions on settlers & settlements? No.

Beast

Every person but you in this thread has exclusively posted about Uncommitted. You did too, until you changed the topic two posts ago.

You decided to invent a new topic of conversation because you were wrong about the one that everyone was talking about including you, for several posts. If you want to be wrong about a completely different subject then by all means, do so.

Both of those guys died, it's like, the second most well known thing about one of them, and arguably the first of the other one.

We are talking about the Uncommitted Movement, which is a real actual thing. Not the people on twitter you are mad at.

This thing where you make up some shit and pretend that a movement to get people to vote in the democratic primary was actually trying to convince people not to vote, based on zero evidence, exactly the opposite of the campaign, is really weird.

The people saying it in this thread are in fact centrists. Likewise, the many democratic officials saying it in the article.

They quite literally did not encourage people to withhold voting. They encouraged people to vote in the democratic primary.