Профиль

AIPAC spent zero dollars boosting Daniel Biss. Therefore there is no sense in which they "bought" the election. Saying they did is a falsehood no matter how you slice it.

This. And this is something the far left doesn’t get. It’s simple logic.

Non-Jews' opinions on what is and is not antisemitic carry as much weight as my opinions about my wife's birthing plan.

Like I said, I'm not making this stuff up. Subhead: "Attorney general cites harassment and concerns about antisemitism within the party"

What...and I cannot stress this enough...the actual fuck.

AIPAC is bad, it supports a lot of bad candidates, its electioneering is often sketchy. No argument there. It also hasn't been particularly successful in achieving the outcomes it wants, and its transformation into the omni-villain of left-wing politics has obvious, disturbing historic echoes.

This case I'm just referencing the fact that he's in the video with Kat. The claim in the video is antisemitic, and he's endorsing the claim by being in the video.

This is exactly what Putin did with Russian oligarchs in 2000: pay to play extortion www.npr.org/sections/mon...

She lost to a guy AIPAC spent seven figures attacking and he proudly reveled in it. The one they backed came third. To call a Biss win "AIPAC bought" is grossly dishonest, and embracing it amounts to El-Sayed attacking an incoming Dem congressman who *agrees* with both of them about Israel & AIPAC.

Reiterating that Musk's literal voter bribery last time was an unambiguous go-directly-to-jail felony, for which people have been successfully prosecuted over vastly smaller amounts. It wasn't just pouring money into a PAC, whatever one thinks of that. It was a black-letter plain-as-day crime.

Another time I pointed out antisemitism someone told me they were sick of me (or maybe Jews in general? "demagoguing antisemitism" & unfollowed in a huff. But I still see them in my mentions. And to this person I say, if you happen to see this, I don't know what to tell you. I ain't making this up.

This stuff isn't borderline, or open to interpretation. Kat and AES are trafficking in centuries-old antisemitic tropes and directly referencing the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. This is no doubt about it, blatant, unrepentant antisemitism.

In terms of antisemitism this would be mostly OK ("[Name of PAC here] bought the election!" is a common phrasing with a long history) except for the fact that AIPAC opposed the winner of Kat's election. Which makes this post straight up "The JOOOS are to blame for this thing I don't like."

TRUMP DOES NOT HAVE IMMUNITY FROM AUDITS. He simply does not. It doesn't matter there is an agreement that says he does. It is simply illegal for him to sign such an agreement. If I sign a settlement agreement that says I'm immune to bullets, it doesn't actually make me immune to bullets.

Star Skirmishes A Small To Do About Nothing The Grapes of Annoyance Singin' in the Drizzle Dr. Strangelove Or: How I Learned To Manage My Anxiety And Only Be Paralyzed By My Fear Of The Bomb Sometimes

Downplay a book or movie: Managing Supervisor of the Rings.

Four-byline alert: 🚨 “.. no sitting American president has ever raised these amounts for his pet projects. .. Trump has been demanding large checks .. telling executives and lobbyists that their companies should give $25 million or $50 million.” @wsj.com www.wsj.com/politics/pol...

Highly recommend. It’s one of my favorites.