Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

Профиль

Jim Oleske

Профиль Vively

Professor, Lewis & Clark Law School. Teach constitutional law and torts, write on religious liberty and equal protection.

Complaint:

Complaint – #1 in Newman v. Perez (S.D. Ohio, 2:26-cv-00908) – CourtListener.comCOMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-11154818), filed by L. Michael Newman. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Forman, Edward) (Entered...storage.courtlistener.comWOSU Public Media

Columbus filmmaker sues Ohio State professors, claims his constitutional rights were violated

000

Yes. Especially when the first three examples given by Josh B. are free exercise cases in which the dissenting opinions Barrett declined to join were applying a super-charged version of the most-favored-nation theory of religious exemptions, for which no originalist argument has ever been made.

000

Asked for comment, a spokesman for Mr. Springsteen and Mr. Morello shared the following video for Mr Cain's remedial viewing:

Bruce Springsteen & Tom Morello - "The Ghost of Tom Joad" | 25th Anniversary ConcertYouTube video by Rock & Roll Hall of Fameyoutu.beThe Daily Beast

Trump critic Bruce Springsteen was attacked by a fellow musician for making his opposition to the president a fixture of his shows.

010

I should add: the reason I went and read the relevant passages in Tucker's treatise is because of @evanbernick.bsky.social's posts about it here. I like to think the Chief's response to Thomas' reliance on Tucker would have led me to take a look, but this not being my area, not sure I would have.

Jim Oleske

Note: I'm not qualified to weigh in on history that Anthony, Ilan, and others have been debating, but I am qualified to read a legal treatise, and Wurman's persistent misrepresentation of Henry St. George Tucker's discussion of birthright citizenship, which Justice Thomas adopted, is depressing.

000

Would be curious to hear what law professors with experience teaching asynchronous classes, or law school administrators overseeing such programs, might have to say about how this dynamic impacts formative assessments in asynchronous law school classes (whether in JD, LLM, or masters programs).

Andrew Heiss

woof ≈80% of assignments this summer term have essentially been just raw chatgpt/claude output, including assignments that required designing stuff in illustrator/affinity/canva. The battle is lost for asynchronous online courses.

394

I knew Steinman wrote Total Eclipse of the Heart and Holding Out for a Hero, but I did not know the story of how he and Tyler connected. So perfect. www.ft.com/content/221c...

031

Note that Kavanaugh goes out of his way to name Ginsburg and O'Connor as the authors of Court's opinions in US v. Virginia and Miss. Univ. for Women v. Hogan, but then he omits the key "exceedingly persuasive" description they both used to describe the high demand of int. scr. in sex discrim. cases.

Evan Bernick, a finite mode with a smol hooman and a lorg floof

Sotomayor over here like, did you read these cases?!

010

A benefit of doing talk radio hits like this: One is unlikely to be asked questions like "but didn't Wurman quite obviously misread what Henry St. George Tucker said about the governing law and didn't the Thomas opinion you find powerful rely on that misreading?" cc @evanbernick.bsky.social

Anthony Michael Kreis

Randy Barnett won’t say what research he did before the NYT op-ed, but says here Wurman and Lash convinced him. Sure sounds like his slapped his name on something he did no work on. Randy Barnett: Birthright Citizenship Decision Is Vulnerable to Reversal morninganswerchicago.com/randy-barnet...

1254

Reading topside briefs in St. Mary's led me to go back to look for an interview I remember Doug Laycock giving as Court was in process of adopting his MFN theory in COVID cases, which led me back to a thread with this post about Ct's shadow docket order in Gateway City Church, precursor to Tandon:

000

Update: 1st Circuit has ruled in favor of Maine in St. Dominic and Crosspoint cases. Schools receiving public funding can be required to comply with nondiscrimination rules. Decisions here (h/t Religion Clause blog): www.ca1.uscourts.gov/sites/ca1/fi... www.ca1.uscourts.gov/sites/ca1/fi...

Jim Oleske

FYI: Oral argument in progress in First Circuit in St. Dominic Academy v. Makin, involving whether Maine can require that private schools receiving state tuition assistance funds comply with nondiscrimination rules. www.youtube.com/watch?v=EIOp...

34111

Mike Ramsey: Although majority in Trump v. Barbara was "entirely right" about original meaning of Citizenship Clause, case is an "originalist disappointment" bc it "could have been the basis of a powerfully unified originalist statement" from all "originalist-oriented justices." Ramsey on dissents:

100

Justice Jackson, yesterday:

020

Narrator: Justice Barrett is the most "serious originalist" on the Court, and she joined the Chief's majority opinion concluding that "there is scant evidence" for Swearer and Wurman's "dramatically revisionist view."* * This is not to say Barrett is a consistent originalist. None of them are.

031
Показать ещё