⟳ Репост от Jed H. Shugerman
Slaughter and Cook may preserve some forms of agency independence, but only through historically strained exceptions, argues @jedshug.bsky.social of @bulaw.bsky.social. www.theregreview.org/2026/07/30/s...
Профиль
Jed H. Shugerman
Профиль Vively
Prof Boston U. Law. JD/PhD History & dad jokes. 5th most-cited legal historian, 2019-23 Book: The People’s Courts. Next: A Faithful President: The Founders v. the Originalists http://shugerblog.com http://ssrn.com/author=625422
⟳ Репост от Jed H. Shugerman
In a recent essay, @jedshug.bsky.social of @bulaw.bsky.social argues that Slaughter and Cook rely on flawed history while leaving agency independence unsettled. www.theregreview.org/2026/07/30/s...
⟳ Репост от Jed H. Shugerman
Law review submissions season. Some observations 1. Be respectful of editors and authors. Communicate promptly. Accept/reject authors respectfully and as soon as is practicable.
⟳ Репост от Jed H. Shugerman
#BULawProf @jedshug.bsky.social discusses the recent SCOTUS cases on executive power with Michael Ramsey (University of San Diego Law) and Thomas Donnelly (@constitutionctr.bsky.social). Listen: constitutioncenter.org/news-debate/...
Does Article II of the Constitution Grant the President Power to Fire Anyone in the Executive Branch?Podcast for Does Article II of the Constitution Grant the President Power to Fire Anyone in the Executive Branch? from the National Constitution Centerconstitutioncenter.org⟳ Репост от Jed H. Shugerman
Supreme Court Historical Fact-Check #5: The Nonsense Appointments Clause Claim with No Evidence Explaining Roberts’s and unitary theorists’ serious misuses of historical sources - which Ilan Wurman dodged in our podcast: open.substack.com/pub/jedshuge...
Daily Supreme Court Historical Fact-Check #5: The Nonsense Appointments Clause Claim with No EvidenceNeither Roberts nor unitary theorists could cite one Founding-era source who agreed with their conclusion, but zero evidence won't stop pseudo-originalists. Control-F Around and Find Out!open.substack.com
⟳ Репост от Jed H. Shugerman
They're interpreting a 117-word clause. They missed half of the words. They're supposed to read the whole clause "—all of it." Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Fin. Prot. Bureau, 591 U.S. 197, 203 (2020).
Jed H. ShugermanSupreme Court Historical Fact-Check #5: The Nonsense Appointments Clause Claim with No Evidence (Plus anti-birthright nonsense) I explain Roberts’s & Wurman’s digital cherrypicking of sentences out of context: Control-F Around and Find Out open.substack.com/pub/jedshuge...
⟳ Репост от Jed H. Shugerman
@muellershewrote.com, you might find this interesting if you are not already aware. A new substack fact-checking the Supreme Court. (Credit to @jonathanmladd.com). bsky.app/profile/jeds...
Jed H. ShugermanDaily Supreme Court Historical Fact-Check #4: In Slaughter, Roberts Omitted the Parts of Jefferson's 1780 Notes that Contradicted His Theory open.substack.com/pub/jedshuge...
⟳ Репост от Jed H. Shugerman
Timing of Argentina's winners in the knockout rounds: vs. Cape Verde: 111th minute vs. Egypt: 92nd minute (stoppage time) vs. Switzerland: 112th minute vs. England: 92nd minute (stoppage time) They haven't led after 90 minutes of any knockout game. But they're in the final.
⟳ Репост от Jed H. Shugerman
Here it is, my 284th #ScholarSunday thread of great public scholarly writing & work, podcast episodes, new & forthcoming books from the past week. Add more below, share as widely as possible, & enjoy, all! 🗃️ + blackwhiteandread.com/scholarsunda...
#ScholarSunday Thread 284 (7/12/26) – Black and White and Read All OverHere it is, my 284th #ScholarSunday thread of great public scholarly writing & work, podcast episodes, new & forthcoming books from the past week. Add more below, share as widely as possible, & enjoy,...blackwhiteandread.com