"At best, it is a long-term option contingent on heavy subsidies, regulatory change and infrastructure build-out. The risk is that reliance on #CCS could delay more viable alternatives (renewables, storage, green hydrogen) and expose Germany to high costs and project failures"
Профиль
Eric Maugendre about emissions
Профиль VivelyData scientist; researching climate policy. I calculate how to avoid much carbon emissions: http://data.yt Banner is a directed acyclic graph. Avatar shows a white man in a heatwave.
Just 16% of countries met a 2025 deadline to identify their nature-harming subsidies, according to new analysis by @giulianaviglione.bsky.social and I 🐛
I keep on saying the same things, so here we go: People think mitigation politics is impossible, but the type of adaptation politics we tend to play is superficially ok at best and only in the short run (it is terribly toxic in the long run)
Happy to have been involved in this work. How a rush for minerals is causing deforestation in tropical regions www.nature.com/articles/d41...
"We find plantations in temperate regions were twice as likely to suffer stand-replacing #wildfires than natural production forests, including in vital timber-producing nations like China and Russia. Plantations in tropical regions showed no clear effect". Bousfield et al. (2025):
much agreement with this 🧵 but pol science has clearly shown that ideologically opposition to clean energy is a direct function of political efforts in fossil fuels sectors and constituencies to generate such ideology. So no, fossil lobbying for their interests and culture wars are not separate.
Zeke HausfatherWhile I agree with Bill that the fossil fuel lobby paid for a lot of climate denial in previous decades, I see ideological opposition to clean energy (and climate action) as a much bigger barrier to progress today than fossil lobbyists.
great reporting on the litigation brought by Big Food companies against public health policies in battleground jurisdictions while the majority of these legal challenges fail, they should be understood as part of a political economy of delay www.lighthousereports.com/investigatio...
'While tour operators often argue that visiting Antarctica can heighten tourists’ awareness of environmental issues, former guides were struck by guests’ ignorance of human impacts. None of the guides quit overnight. Their decisions emerged through years of reflection, uncertainty & moral conflict'
Starmer's nature plan is pathetic. Burnham must do better. I've written about the government's '30by30 Delivery Plan', out today, which isn't a plan & won't deliver 30by30. I suggest some policies Burnham should pursue instead, amidst Blackadder gifs: guyshrubsole.substack.com/p/starmers-n... 1/🧵
1/ We've a new paper: The highest-impact diets belong to the people with the most choices. In @nature.com Food, led by Oliver Taherzadeh and Hongyi Cai: across 165 countries, the highest dietary emissions per person are among highly educated urban men aged 15-34. doi.org/10.1038/s43016-026-01389-y