⟳ Репост от cliodialogues
Remembering isn't passive. Museums choose artifacts. Authors choose stories. Families choose photographs. History isn't just preserved. It's curated. That makes one question especially important: What have we forgotten?
Профиль
cliodialogues
Профиль Vively
Hosted by historian, Dr. Jennifer Robin Terry, 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝘾𝙡𝙞𝙤 𝘿𝙞𝙖𝙡𝙤𝙜𝙪𝙚𝙨 is a history podcast featuring conversations with historians and other experts whose work connects past and present in illuminating ways. 𝐖𝐚𝐭𝐜𝐡 𝐨𝐫 𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐧: https://linktr.ee/cliodialogues
⟳ Репост от cliodialogues
I wrote a book about that. From the colonial period to 1888, international & interstate borders were controlled by the colonies and then states, in large part b/c of slavery. The feds don't take over until slavery is politically off the table, states stop fighting to retain migration control.
Book - Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship — Anna O. Lawwww.annaolaw.comDavid NelsonI notice that the Constitution does not give Congress the power to make laws regarding immigration. Naturalization, yes, but not immigration. I’m wondering how our unconstitutional immigration laws came to be.
⟳ Репост от cliodialogues
Who decides what history gets funded? A major shift in federal grant-making could change how humanities funding decisions are made and who gets to make them. Read the latest Substack post to learn what's at stake, why it matters, and how you can make your voice heard. https://ow.ly/KY7i50ZkHyu
The Pending Power Grab of Federal Grant-Making: Time to Speak Up!By Christopher Sellersow.ly⟳ Репост от cliodialogues
Me on @cliodialogues.bsky.social talking about Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship in the week that the Trump v Barbara birthright citizenship opinion dropped.
⟳ Репост от cliodialogues
🗃️ Piece by newly minted PhD @violaburlew.bsky.social on teaching about race and World War II using posters and visual analysis (America in a World at War issue). www.oah.org/tah/america-...
www.oah.org⟳ Репост от cliodialogues
This is my lane. I went through the 194 Trump v Barbara opinion from yesterday section by section, noting what they got right about US migration and citizenship history, and what the dissents get wrong. Please share if you think it is helpful to others.
I Read Trump v Barbara So You Don’t Have To — Anna O. LawAs someone who took 16 years to research and write a new book, Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship , a policy and legal history, I paid keen attention to the oral arguments (April 1) ...www.annaolaw.com
⟳ Репост от cliodialogues
Supreme Court of the United States expected to issue ruling on birthright citizenship today. Recommend you follow @unlawfulentries.bsky.social for insight and analysis on this significant ruling. #SCOTUS #birthright #citizenship
⟳ Репост от cliodialogues
History needs advocates. Support the AHA Advocacy Fund to help us defend history and the humanities, protect historical research and education, and speak up for historians when it matters most. Donate today:
Donate - AHAShow Your Support Support History-Donate Now What Your Gift Supports Give Today The American Historical Association, founded in 1884, is the largest association of historians in the world. We promote ...www.historians.org
⟳ Репост от cliodialogues