Профиль

You clearly don't understand how "protected categories" work.

You don't have an argument. Every time someone proves you wrong, you dig for excuses to ignore what they bring up as being minor, or exceptions, or otherwise something that can be ignored.

There is evidence in favor. You just refuse to accept it.

Do you even understand the argument? Can you summarize it accurately?

Or they demand that the wrong control group be used! There was a trial that anyone well-versed in the field would recognize as a form of comparing WPATH SOC 6 to WPATH SOC 8. Naysayers said it was meaningless since the SOC 6 group still knew they would eventually get HRT. 🙄

That's not what "it does make a difference" means. You made a broad statement, and that was proven wrong. Switching to a narrower statement and pretending that's what you meant all along is dishonesty.

There is *no* evidence against it that can't be traced back to an unrelated cause such as misdiagnosis.

It does make a difference. You just wish to ignore it.

Strawman

"Almost binary" isn't "binary." There's no benefit to ignoring the bits that make sex not-binary and no reason to do so that isn't rooted in ideology.

So you're again saying things that aren't 100% true and then complaining when you're called out on it. "Pretty much any" isn't "any". Your questions have been answered. Multiple times. bsky.app/profile/mask...

You're the one making statements that aren't 100% true and then complaining when people call you out in it.

Just because you don't like or understand something does not make it irrational. What *is* irrational is using subjective criteria and pretending that they're objective, as you do when you use terms like "organized around" or "developed towards".

Again, you have no evidence of that.

All you have are personal attacks and demonstrations showing that you don't understand certain concepts.

That isn't what the words you used mean. You didn't say it was a risk. You said it happened. bsky.app/profile/bata...

No, and no.

You absolutely are.

And there are transgender people who exist outside of that. What's your point? You still have no evidence that only people conditioned to answer a certain way responded to the survey.

You're the one who believes in the thing being critiqued. Can you summarize it?