Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

Публикация

most tech outlets spent the week burying the lede that this was a completely avoidable error (or intentional marketing decision) by a human being, and not a malevolent self aware cyber consciousness that slipped its leash

OpenAI’s Hacking Debacle Comes Down to Human ErrorIf the generative AI giant had followed well-known security best practices, it’s likely that its AI agent would never have escaped to the open internet and hacked multiple companies.www.wired.com
Обсуждение

8 прямых ответов · 9 сообщений

they want you to think its more powerful than it is for 2 reasons: 1) marketing ofc, 2) make AI legislation a must pass bill. they'll name it the we hate ai just like you act, but it'll give them immunity bsky.app/profile/t0us...

t0ussaint ☭黑人问号脸

arstechnica.com/security/202...

Yeah, I now assume every "General AI is coming and if we're lucky it will keep us as pets" story is marketing by someone who just poked the stochastic parrot 322 times and didn't get anything they could use.

and I'd say the general media outlets did more than bury the lede. they were positively getting OFF on the idea that IT ESCAPED!!!!!! LOOK IT'S CONSCIOUS!!!!!!!!! I assume a lot of people in US media are stockholders in this shit and like the thought of a world where Altman isn't bullshitting us

Ответ для Sarah Sunfire

The whole "we need to keep humans in the loop and accountable" discourse ignores the fact that there has always been humans in the loop and they're doing wonders for themselves to make sure they won't be held accountable.

"well people click on it, so clearly they enjoy it! The demand is there, what's so wrong with supplying the fake news the customers crave??"

@karlbode.com If someone has a gift link, or another source, it would be much appreciated.

@karlbode.com Nice goatse!!!

I just want to know why they are referring to malware as “AI”.