Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

Публикация

Предыдущая публикация

Pritzker: Neither Texas nor the FBI at the federal level has the authority to arrest these Texas Democrats They’re welcome to visit to take in the great views and enjoy the incredible restaurants we have. But they won’t be taking anyone home with them, or out of the state.

28013,9 тыс.3,1 тыс.

This guy. Not Gavin. Not Rahm.

Обсуждение

7 прямых ответов · 24 сообщений

@govpritzker.illinois.gov is great.

As much as I don’t want to give up my governor, I agree! Send him to the White House!

I've said give us a real leader and we'll follow. Pritzker is the guy.

Ответ для That Escalated Quickly

Hiding in plain sight the whole time.

Ответ для That Escalated Quickly

He's literally destroying the city of Chicago as we speak, but because Trump is around, he can be like "look at how vewy bad Trump is!" in response to everything. His record as gov of Illinois is way worse than Newsom's. chicago.suntimes.com/city-hall/20...

Pritzker's signature on police pension bill adds pressure for state bailout and city property tax hikeThe bill will cost the city $60 million more in 2027, and by 2055, city pension payments will be $750 million higher than they are now. It adds one more big pressure point onto Mayor Brandon Johnson, ...chicago.suntimes.com
Ответ для Karolina Muchova Fan Club

How's he destroying the city?

Ответ для Mara evans
Ответ для Karolina Muchova Fan Club

I did. In its entirety.

Ответ для Mara evans

Adding $11 billion to Chicago's long-term pension liability the way Pritzker did is a BFD. Not sure why anyone would downplay it. Even Chicago's mayor is calling out how awful a decision it was from JB www.chicagobusiness.com/opinion/poli...

Opinion: Chicago's pension crisis just got $11 billion worseA new law signed by Gov. JB Pritzker will deepen Chicago’s pension crisis by $11 billion, slashing funding levels and straining city finances for decades.www.chicagobusiness.com
Ответ для Karolina Muchova Fan Club

Citizens, and I don't just mean in chicago, have to decide whether they want to pay for good local services with good paying jobs and pensions, or they don't. I guess Chicago could always cut back significantly on their police, firefighters and paramedics.

Ответ для Karolina Muchova Fan Club

Did you read this part? No matter your opinion on this law, Pritzker couldn't have blocked it.

Ответ для Flow Void

Of course he could have. It's called vetoing

Ответ для Karolina Muchova Fan Club

Make them override the veto and make the argument for Chicago having stable finances. He KNEW we'd be in deep shit if this bill passed www.cbsnews.com/chicago/news...

Mayor Brandon Johnson says Chicago finances have reached "point of no return"The mayor's statement came in response to a question about a pension bill signed into law by Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker last week.www.cbsnews.com
Ответ для Karolina Muchova Fan Club

If it's unanimous, then a veto will inevitably be overriden. There is no point in "making them" vote twice for the same thing, there are better ways to spend their time.

Ответ для Flow Void

There is totally a point. Have the courage to not ruin the economic engine of your state. Pritzker has zero courage. All he stands for is getting through the prez primary with "did you know TRUMP IS BAD???"

Ответ для Karolina Muchova Fan Club

It takes no courage to issue a useless veto and then shrug, "Welp, I tried". Blame your state representatives, who actually could have made a difference.

jfc Newsom's bad enough; are people STILL talking about Rahm? I'll be glad if my greasy governor goes ahead and follows through with redistricting here--bluntly I think we should do it regardless (at very least if any OTHER red state manages) and then, he can retire.

Ответ для Democracy Dies in Dorkness

Thankfully, no one who matters. He's definitely popular in Cuomo circles for obvious reasons.

Ответ для Matt Rowan

"popular in Cuomo circles" must be something like "this is the Citizen Kane of documentaries about 30-50 feral hogs."

Absolutely not Rahm.

Not Pete.

Ответ для Trish Anderton

I like Pete a lot but definitely not now. He'd be great in another cabinet position.

Ответ для Mara evans

I loved him as transportation secretary but his comments on trans kids have moved him to the No column for me