Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

Публикация

Предыдущая публикация

"researchers do want rankings and lists. They want shortcuts for hiring and promotion." I disagree. In my limited experience on hiring committees, the final decision is often about mundane departmental things; no one is counting impact factors anymore, at least not as much as I imagined.

210

I would argue that for the first cutoff, however, IF and journal name are still impactful - whether consciously or not, I wouln’t be surprised if when reading CVs, most researchers automatically apply an implied « impact » depending on where the applicant has published

Обсуждение

Ответы

yes, definitively; having papers in journals that are known is important. But there is no final hypercompetitive ranking based on impact factors, at least I haven't seen it.

Ответ для flymuscles

There are institutions that assign scores to IF and use those to decide who to interview (at least partially). Don't get above a certain score and don't get an interview. It may not be the decider but it is in use in some places