Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

Публикация

Could be a hot take but an AES close win might be for the best tbh we were all riding *a little* too high after all of our recent victories. Probably would be good to hit the brakes a little even if the march continues.

Обсуждение

3 прямых ответов · 5 сообщений

Показаны не все ответы

Публичный счётчик показывает 5, а источник передал 3. Остальные ответы могли быть удалены, скрыты или не выданы публично.

Agreed. Assuming he pulls it off (and it looks like he will) it’s actually a good place for him to start from. He won’t have to convince anyone that there’s work to do.

I also saw that his campaign consultants were specifically known to game polling averages by flooding lots of positive polls as a way of muddying the waters (props to them, I think it helped make him seem viable when he otherwise wasn't considered so)

Good opportunity to inform voters and address Stevens' smear campaigns. Also to talk to McMarrow voters because sheesh!

Ответ для Jackson

I think it would be best to try to win over Stevens & McMorrow voters without insulting them or the candidates they voted for. I slightly preferred McMorrow and was called some variation of a “bot AIPAC shill genocide lover” repeatedly by only AES voters, never Stevens voters.

Ответ для Droopy Ters

I agree with your first paragraph but voting based on voters is not the strategy. It can cut any way. Stevens voters have been toxic on here