Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

Публикация

Предыдущая публикация

3. People assumed he hedged somehow. He was known to have a short book, he was known to buy out options on his names, the assumption was that given the names he traded he would have some structure to prevent a loss like this (which, historically, is *not that large*, these are very volatile stocks)

4951

4. Everyone (including me) underestimated the leverage being used. Because the assets on the 13-F were roughly in line with Form ADV assets + PnL, people assumed 1ish leverage (appropriate give the volatility!). Apparently the actual number was closer to 4, which is about Bill Hwang levels.

Обсуждение

2 прямых ответов · 51 сообщений

Allegedly, there were massive assets on swap that were never reported. I have heard various numbers swirl around re: the size of his SK Hynix position that went unreported but they are similar in size to his entire AUM

Ответ для Quantian

5. Apparently he was still accepting capital in a very big way and not closed to new investors. He couldn’t re-deploy that into the Anthropic stake so he doubled down on the public companies at basically the exact end of June peak in all of them.

Ответ для Quantian

In conclusion: a very good stockpicker and a very bad portfolio manager, and the latter was sufficiently disastrous he wound up destroying most of his assets and probably causing the largest trading loss of all time. If the reported numbers are true, going $45bn -> $10bn is 3x the size of Archegos.

Ответ для Quantian

Also a certain degree of kudos to the primes, who this time managed to work the whole thing out without losing money themselves and without contagion to the wider market.

Ответ для Dan Davies

(this does not mean that I now like or rate prime brokerage as an industry)

Ответ для Dan Davies

Benevolence of Kenny G helped there

Ответ для Metro North Capital

I don't think he did it out of charity. Given the absolute proliferation of thematic AI ETFs, it would not have been difficult to hedge the whole thing

Ответ для Dan Davies

Of course not, he fucking scalped him. Total coup

Ответ для Quantian

Oh, bonus: his investors were very sophisticated people, including senior leadership at prominent trading firms etc who are regarded as extreme sharps. He wasn’t raising money from random dentists or even VC funds and people assumed that they had done their diligence (another classic tale)

Ответ для Quantian

Also, disclaimer: when these things happen there’s gossip, rumors, conjectures, friends of a friend who work at Nintendo who say so and so, anonymous Bloomberg chats getting recycled and passed around as fact by brokers, etc. It may have gone down very differently than initial appearances!

Ответ для Quantian

All he needed was a Jeremy Irons

Ответ для lewburton

I'm afraid I don't hear any music at all.

Ответ для lewburton

Apparently he had what he needed, updating

Ответ для Quantian

None of this reads any different than my initial reaction: 25 year old gets wads of money thrown at him, loses his head & loses it all. The fault is not in the 25 year old but in the ones who threw wads of money at him.

Ответ для Quantian

Update from the WSJ this AM: official number per SALP is -67%, meaning a $30bn loss. $10bn of privates plus $5bn of remaining unlevered equity positions remain, and they plan on continuing to run an unlevered equity LO sleeve going forward. Still up 80% YTD!

Ответ для Quantian

Short sellers. Even when it was leverage, I knew it was short sellers

Ответ для Jonesy

Like. My dude. You put on like $10bn in new investment in a month to positions that were getting tons of press. And now you’re like, we became targets. Is this the thing where people are learning the most basic lessons very publicly and then being like “my bad”.

Ответ для Flying Mezerkis

“I can’t believe leverage works both ways. You’re telling me this thing could go down too!?”

Ответ для Flying Mezerkis

It’s not like we’re talking about someone with deep academic and professional experience in the field. Combined with the idiocy/arrogance of 20 something VC culture mindset? Recipe for success.

Ответ для derelict515

I don’t have any experience. But I know this stuff. That’s why people cap funds. Been doing so for 30 years.

Ответ для Jonesy

when we're up huge it was because of smart leverage but when we lose money it was those evil short sellers

Ответ для Quantian

“blamed short sellers” f’ing loser bagholder behavior

Ответ для Quantian

What’s your estimate of Leo’s net worth this morning?

Ответ для Quantian

"we were targeted by short sellers" 😂

Ответ для Quantian

Being a LP in a hedge fund has such bad risk to reward. Path of returns is a bitch, fees are terrible, incentives are bad. You better really really trust the manager. I say this as a lp in a l/s tech fund.

Ответ для Quantian
Ответ для Quantian

Network effect, and we're all dumb money in the end. Welcome to America, bud!

Ответ для Quantian

Running insane leverage and similar risk in both short and long book have never really worked out. He will not be the last victim to this I fear though.

Ответ для Quantian

Does this guy even have a series 7 or anything?

Ответ для Wes

You don’t need a series 7 to run a hedge fund, you aren’t facing retail clients. You may need a 65 but you also may not, it depends.

Ответ для Quantian

Right. My point is 1. Did he have any certs, and 2. Did the 'investors' even care, and if not, why not?

Ответ для Wes

He didn’t and accredited investors usually don’t care if you are SEC registered. Series exams are mostly intended to prevent boiler rooms preying on Grandma’s account and completely unskilled advisors, not hedge fund blowups in the hundreds of millions.

Ответ для Quantian

(Syntactic ambiguity resolution: investors VERY MUCH do care that you are SEC/FINRA registered, once that box is checked they generally don’t about like series exams or state registration or whatever)

Ответ для Quantian

Largest loss by total size, not by drawdown 🤣

Ответ для Quantian

How do you make a small fortune?

Ответ для Ea-nāṣir

Start with a large one.

Ответ для DC Leclair

BOOM 💥

Ответ для Quantian

Fascinating story. If I understand it all, he still ends up with $5B of Anthropic, not bad considering the initial seed capital was $200M. Just didn't think to take some chips off the table.

Ответ для Quantian

How long has he been trading? Because someone trading the hot stocks of the moment for a year or two is not an incredible stock picker.

Ответ для HudsonRiverCroc
Ответ для Fred, His Enemy Getting a Vote

Yeah, that's the thing. There's a thousand people who made a ton of money trading the hot stocks for a year or two. He got super lucky that he had access to large investors.

Ответ для HudsonRiverCroc

This is a classic case of people, who should’ve known better, focusing on metrics that can be manipulated, and not caring at all about the substance and experience of the people doing the trading. And the AI angle certainly played a role in pulling the wool over the eyes of allegedly smart people.

Ответ для Udarnik 🇺🇦

People *really* should have known better.

Ответ для HudsonRiverCroc
Ответ для ellenahzulu

Yeah, super connected dude who got lucky and blew up his luck. He will still fail up.

Ответ для Quantian

Greed is under appreciated and can get some of the best minds. Discipline vs Greed. Greed wins most of the time.

Ответ для Quantian

Oh wow

Ответ для Quantian
J

That would be wild given the Archegos history.

i dont know what this all means. This guy sounds like a nerd