Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

Публикация

Incredible.

Обсуждение

Ответы

Both respectable choices. 🙄

Whenever I see "it depends" my initial assumption is that it's from NYT Pitchbot, but here... well, it's from the kind of NYT headline that inspired the pitchbot in the first place.

"Does trying to overthrow an election and calling on a deadly mob to storm the capital to prevent the peaceful transfer of power kill a political career? It depends."

"But the National Socialist German Workers' Party have taken a different tack."

That’s a Pulitzer-level self-own.

Of course they've taken a different track, their base will elect a rapist for president

"...but Republicans like rape."

The “analysis” page in NYT is consistently the most ridiculous when it comes to headlines and subheadlines. It HAS to be run by some MAGA idiot.

Textbook journalistic malpractice

Ответ для Self Saboteur

should nonpolitical actions affect campaigns?

Does a permanent vegetative state end a political career? Not if you can lie about it shamelessly and repeatedly as republicans have.

Remember kids, there's one party where being a rapist is disqualifying, and one where it's feature. "BUT AIPAC!" all you want. They are not the same.

Ответ для Andre Wehrle

Maybe all the things leading up to him having been called a rapist should have also been disqualifying? Like, you know, the Nazi tattoo?

Ответ для Andre Wehrle

We can do two things at once. It’s actually fairly easy

What's this from?

Ответ для Eileen

The New York Times

Yeah they have 😕 for decades.

Fuck

I had to check if that was real. That, uh, that... what?

Brilliant

Reads exactly like a pitchbot skeet.

So the NYT can get worse

NY Times never fails to fail.

“But Republicans have taken a different tack.”

Ответ для A.J. Bauer

Lol, bet an AI is writing the headers and has strip mined nyt pitchbot

Ответ для A.J. Bauer

Want to learn more about what made the Times like this? Check out my book: cup.columbia.edu/book/making-...

Making the Liberal Media | Columbia University PressConservatives have disagreed about many things, but they have long been united by the belief that the mainstream—or “liberal”—media is biased against... | CUPcup.columbia.edu
Ответ для A.J. Bauer

my god

Ответ для A.J. Bauer

That is true. I mean they could publish all the epstein files with plenty of pics of Trump raping and the Republican Leader, Johnston, would claim tht Trump, heroically going undercover to expose pedophilia, heroically overcame his disgust and performed it himself. And they would nod.

Ответ для A.J. Bauer

Yeah, the "different tack" is them not giving a fuck about basic ass morality as they claimed to do anymore. Who the hell is this article even for!?

Ответ для A.J. Bauer

What if, instead of morality,

“A different tack.” That’s an interesting way to say “not giving a shit.”

How incredible? This headline doesn’t suggest that both attitudes are equivalent. On the contrary, it highlights the moral gap between the two parties. « It depends » obviously makes any reader with a sense of what is good or wrong condemn the Republicans, because of course, it shouldn’t depend...

Ответ для sebknight4401

It highlights the glaring double standard the media has for Democrats and Republicans while entirely ignoring the fact the media is the source of the glaring double standard.

Ответ для sebknight4401

Taken out of context without the rest of the shit @nytimes.com is guilty of maybe but we all see who they are

Ответ для sebknight4401

It only depends if the media lets it depend. The Times has considerable sway over national news framing.

This seems like a fairly straightforward description of the political reality, though. The headline does not ask whether such claims *should* kill a political career, merely whether they *do*. And yes, it depends: Republicans and Democrats *do* treat SA claims differently!

“Analysis”

The NYT really can't help themselves, can they?

You're gonna put the NYT pitchbot out of a job!