Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

Публикация

Предыдущая публикация

I cannot get over how bad it is that NYC no longer has really any pass product at all. The farecap window is random and untrackable. The fare multiple to hit it is very high. Now they're going to try to do citywide bus proof-of-payment without anybody having prepaid their fare with a pass? Disaster!

5748

What a crazy thing to say. Has Janno Lieber never paid rent or a mortgage? Has he never gotten a regular paycheck? Paying weekly or monthly upfront for a core service that you use regularly is a basic fact of adulthood. Creating an explosion of fare evasion because nobody has prepaid passes...

Обсуждение

4 прямых ответов · 37 сообщений

A

Also he'd have a semblance of ground to stand on if they actually implemented a fare cap version of the 30 day pass, except they didn't even do that

Ответ для Adam Boritz
A

It's actually pretty wild to think about how they try to claim someone can't afford a 30 day pass upfront, so now they're paying significantly more over 30 days, even after adjusting for the fare increase. Yet this is supposedly better for those folks?

I think the problem is that the MTA saw this as an ‘or’ — they could do a fare cap OR a pass. The equitable thing to do is to have a fare cap AND a pass. The pass can — and should — be cheaper than the cap.

Ответ для Sam G

Nobody has ever explained why it has to be an ‘or’ other than the MTA’s lack of imagination and inability to manage vendors

C

Nobody understands why LUL came up with fare capping in the first place. It's because their fare system is relatively complex, they have a zonal system and the cost of a day pass varied depending on whether you got it before the end of morning rush hour or after.

...anymore and has to make the "right" decision twice a day rather than once a month and then calling the alternative "inequitable" is just insane.

Ответ для Stephen Jacob Smith

OMNY is much more of a surveillance system than the metrocards were. Also with my unlimited monthly card, I could freely swipe people in on my way out. At my outer Brooklyn stop full of immigrant families, there would often be people waiting at turnstile to be offered a swipe by those exiting.

Ответ для Vicki Madden

Metrocards were already extremely trackable - the surveillance potential was just invisible to riders, whereas now it's more obvious

Ответ для Aditya Mukerjee 🦦 🏳️‍🌈

But I could buy it with cash. OMNY I think you can only buy a one-day card with cash. Anything longer requires a credit card.

Ответ для Vicki Madden

You can absolutely buy an OMNY card with cash and refill it with cash at both vending machines and retail stores

Ответ для bsquiklehausen

Good to know

Ответ для Vicki Madden

This is among the worst arguments for the metro card.

Ответ для Vicki Madden

They're equally surveilable if you pay with cash (you can load an OMNY card with cash), and you can tap after exiting and it still goes toward your cap, so you can do the same thing as swiping people in when you exit.

Ответ для Vicki Madden

OMNY swipes would be an incredibly poor data set. You can easily just buy much better tracking tied to actual identities for pretty cheap.

Ответ для Stephen Jacob Smith

I actually heard exactly this from an MTA employee, that the free pass they get is not the best idea because it detaches them from experiencing the agency’s main product bsky.app/profile/thel...

The LIRR Today

A major reason OMNY went off the rails is that nobody at the MTA actually pays fares! So they are almost completely disconnected from the reality of how those of us who do pay our fares go about it (and how it influences travel habits) and their too aloof to put themselves in riders' shoes

Ответ для Stephen Jacob Smith

They should give every MTA employee a transit benefits card with exactly the monthly fare cap on it.

Ответ для Sam G

Nah, they should have to go through the hassle of enrolling, managing elections, keeping on top of separate balances, and carrying around an extra card in their wallets like the rest of us to get the full experience.

Ответ для The LIRR Today

Transit benefits cards don’t have tap to pay, so they’d have to manage the OMNY-loading themselves.

Ответ для Stephen Jacob Smith

It's a huge issue. Not to mention a tremendous lost revenue source. How many companies give their employees a 100% discount on their product? (especially one that's regulated by IRS as fringe benefit) If MTA employees actually paid for their commutes, maybe they'd put more effort into improving svc

Ответ для The LIRR Today

Free travel is the sole reason many people work at airlines

Ответ для Jason Rabinowitz

Free travel is strictly space available though, right? On some of the morning Ronkonkoma trains a third of the car will get up out of seats at Hillside.

Ответ для The LIRR Today

Airlines also don't get $23 billion a year in taxpayer subsidies

Ответ для The LIRR Today

True, it’s much more than that

Ответ для Interlocker

And even with these enormous subsidies, the entire airline system in the US manages to carry less than the MTA. Time for reform?

Ответ для Interlocker

This is a dumb way to compare ridership across modes. Every short-haul mode will carry more people than a long-haul mode. More people probably drive from one parking lot to another adjacent one every day than ride transit too.

Ответ для Stephen Jacob Smith

It was a very serious comment so I appreciate your response

Ответ для Interlocker

What reform are you proposing exactly? These two things fill completely different needs. No one is taking a subway train from New York to Chicago; no one is taking a plane from Parkchester to midtown.

Ответ для Jason Rabinowitz

Yeah this is a... pretty standard perk of transportation companies both public and private?

Ответ для bsquiklehausen

(Also the implication that it's a "tremendous source of lost revenue" when the MTA is 70k people all-told. Even if that's 2 rides per day for every single employee (including railroad people, Bridges & Tunnels, every bus operator, etc) that's less than 2% of rides)

Ответ для bsquiklehausen

70k employees x 2 trips/day x $3 /trip x 250 days = $105 million 25k rail commuters x $350 /month x 12 months = another $105 million We're two third of the way towards solving next year's deficit! bsky.app/profile/thel...

The LIRR Today

Who could have guessed that two payroll tax hikes, anew congestion charge, casino revenues, and a bunch of fare and toll hikes was not the express ticket to financial stability!? I thought mobile ticket activations was the number 1 issue faced by the MTA

Ответ для The LIRR Today

the best railroad is one that has no employees and owns no assets therefore having a perfect operating ratio

Ответ для The LIRR Today

Except you'd have to match every dollar you spend here with raises for the employees who now have to spend money on transit! This is an astonishingly common perk (for a relatively perk-free industry) and it's a major selling point for people who work for the MTA!

Ответ для bsquiklehausen

(Also thinking that more than 1 in 3 MTA employees is a railroad rider is one of the most insane things you've ever said, and that's a high bar)

Ответ для bsquiklehausen

You're right, they would all drive if they actually had to pay for LIRR/MNR service

Ответ для bsquiklehausen

"a relatively perk-free industry" Have you seen the ATU health plan?

Ответ для Ryan Hassett

Ok true - the pension and insurance are stellar, but that's at the cost of bonuses, points/shares, food/snacks, remote opportunities (these days), and just straight up base pay for some roles. (I do know this is an obviously office-coded comparison though - I can't speak for frontline staff)

Ответ для Stephen Jacob Smith

This is responsible for a lot of Amtrak NEC dysfunction as well IMO. I think executives should have to pay for these services.