Parallels to medical malpractice are strong here: pick one conceptualization. If LLM is an algorithm, then the corporation is responsible. If the algorithm is an “intelligence,” “a colleague,” a licensed “practitioner,” or has a corporate title, then an employee of these corporations hacked rivals.
Kris ShrishakThere is always a human responsible Principle '"The algorithm did it" is not an acceptable excuse if algorithmic systems make mistakes or have undesired consequences, including from machine-learning processes' Claims www.bbc.com/news/article... www.bbc.com/news/article... #AI @abeba.blacksky.app