Обсуждение

If you change it to 'liquidate the study of the study of society', it might fit into the tempo of 'I am the very model of a modern major general'.

Very interesting, Eva von Redecker talks in her new book about „liquidierende Phantombesitzverteidigung“ which translates as "liquidating phantompossessiondefense" as a definition for the new fascism. I`ll read into it the next days, but how crazy that the WSJ actually uses the same wording.

Paul's opinions are largely based on anecdotes, provocative quotes and correlations. Falling enrollment doesn’t prove "wokeness" caused it. Studying inequality isn’t the same as advocacy. And the report she leans on explicitly says its examples do not establish how widespread politicization is.

WSJ columnists have achieved post ideological truth, zizek should gtfo it's over

The wsj is not an objective observer of humanity.

when the robots lead…

correct alt: two *lecterns

Sounds like the author has beliefs that sociologists proved are wrong and stupid.

In the great tradition of Auguste Comte as far as "how do we use Greek roots" goes.

Is that like historiography but for sociology?

I was on board, until I realized it wasn't Scientology.

*taps the sign yet again*

We should absolutely liquidate sociologology The sociologologologists all agree.

If that's by Pamela Paul, I have the one sentence description of it she told me two weeks ago when she asked me for info

I see DEI figures prominently as a villain here. Quel surprise. 😐

I bet @tressiemcphd.bsky.social has some things to say

My replies today are all AYKM?

This is an interesting lecture from last year. There’s a portion where she discusses attempts to destroy higher education.

Anti-intellectualism

this fuckin country