Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

Публикация

great, another article where a book was pulled after AI claims. I hate AI, I do not use it, but I also hate that now I have to think about how to accumulate 'proof' that a work is mine from snout to tail. People are talking about recording themselves writing? How the hell?

Обсуждение

6 прямых ответов · 32 сообщений

I'll start getting to work on the signed, notarised affidavit from people I attended writing sprints with months ago and screenshots from WIP snippets I posted on Bluesky as part of a writer hashtag. 🙄

This honestly worries me. I edit as I go, so I don’t have multiple drafts to show as evidence.

Ответ для Shona Kinsella

right? I often 'work into' a draft multiple times, rather than keep thousands of drafts. I mean, I do have some fresh drafts, but yeah. The idea that every process looks the same is ludicrous

Ответ для Shona Kinsella

If that's a concern for you, then save snapshots and date them - you do back up, right? ... right?

Ответ для Ms Chatelaine

I do back up, yes. I have copies saved to my desktop, the cloud, and on a usb drive

Ответ для Shona Kinsella

Date them and don't overwrite them - good backup practise anyway so long as you have storage space - and that's your ongoing evidence of writing, and of rewriting, sorted

Ответ для Ms Chatelaine

Ah, great idea. I do usually overwrite, but keeping one a month or something would show the progress. Thanks!

Ответ для Shona Kinsella

First thing I do in most writing sessions is save a copy of the file with today's date and that way I have backups if I decide I've fucked up.

Ответ для peter remote morrison

One of the reasons I like Scrivener is, it does that automatically so you can roll back.

Ответ для Ms Chatelaine

I never clicked with it, though meant to persevere some. But i am chaos fuck up writer monkey.

Ответ для peter remote morrison

I'm utterly non-linear, a mad mind mapper, so the note card structure really suits my way of thinking.

Ответ для Ms Chatelaine

That was the 1st thing I played with and could definitely see the appeal. But I tend to do hand written bullet points and scribbled potential scenes in a notebook, then type those up. Then in editing pick key sections, rewriting by hand, then inserting back in as replacements.

Ответ для peter remote morrison
Ответ для CL Hellisen | Preorder The Shape of Monsters

Best thing to do is find some automatic process - buy an app if you have to - and tag your writing drive for regular automatic backup. The system will do it for you, the images will be tagged by date, and it won't overwrite any of them until your storage is full. If you use a Mac, by a Time Capsule

Ответ для Ms Chatelaine

...buy ... a Time Capsule

Ответ для Ms Chatelaine

Then it'll just work in the background and you only have to pay attention to it when the shit hits the fan - drives crash, computers burn out, it's a thing - or you need to produce an answer to some shithead claiming you use AI

Ответ для Shona Kinsella
Ответ для CL Hellisen | Preorder The Shape of Monsters

😁

You can record yourself writing post hoc, so that doesn't prove anything.

Ответ для Tade Thompson
Ответ для CL Hellisen | Preorder The Shape of Monsters

Do what I intend to do: Nothing.

Ответ для Tade Thompson
Ответ для CL Hellisen | Preorder The Shape of Monsters

I am too busy and too old for this shit.

Ответ для Tade Thompson

It's an interesting one - supposedly the author was unable to provide 'evolution of the writing' - this is going to become a shit-fire. Proving you didn't use AI...

Ответ для New Martin Express

Time to write everything by hand.

Ответ для Ed Of Fannyside

I'm not sure that proves much apart from that you are a copyist

Ответ для New Martin Express

If someone can't be bothered to write their own book, they too lazy to hand copy the machine output.

Ответ для Ed Of Fannyside

Plotter with AI to mimic handwriting

A bundled together portfolio of evidence of 1000 sticky notes. I shudder to think of what big publishing conglomerates are going to do, in order deal with this.

I believe a history of drafts should normally suffice. But I share the sentiment. Humans shouldn't be required to prove what they created is truly theirs.

The current version of word actually keeps an access log of time spent etc. So very easy to prove that way if you use that software.