There are many barriers that prevent these students from accessing the full benefit of their education let's address that too, shall we? Especially since we don't have time machines.
The other day I read an article about DoorDash drone delivery and wondered how they were going to get the food in the drones. Are they going to make overburdened restaurant workers watch for and load them? It turns out they solved this in the dumbest way possible.
I taught during that time and it was a heartbreaking time that had negative long-term repercussions, but it was better than the alternative, which again was even more mass death.
What are you talking about? This has been a constant topic of discussion for 6 years. Countless articles and opinion pieces have been written about this.
As a teacher, I'm sick of having to listen to people talk about killing kids (COVID, gun violence, keeping sick kids in school to up attendance numbers) as just sort of acceptable to maintain the status quo. But calling pointing this out "stifling" is so insulting.
Besides how disturbing it is that he would even propose this, how would this even work? The calendar would only be able to tell the AI where and when (maybe what team they played), it would have to make up details like if they scored a goal or who was there.
Laying aside the issues with both the science and how social constructs work, why would they assume that the existence of a disability and the idea that society should change to accommodate people are mutually exclusive?
