Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

Профиль

toastyghost

Профиль Vively

I hear they support starting some new ones so candidates can diversify

000

Taxpayers don't have standing (FFRF v. Hein)

020

You have no idea who I voted for and are for some reason assuming I voted for Trump (could it be because you can't conceive that a Democrat might disagree with you?)

100

This might also be called Watergate

260

What did the President know and when did he know it?

1160

Wow you're exactly right. MY responsibility for the supreme court is much greater than sitting Supreme Court Justice RBG. What astute political analysis!

110

Alas the people in power have no autonomy, it is truly the voters' fault that RBG didn't retire when she could have *guaranteed* a favorable replacement and instead stayed on the Court so ACB could destroy her legacy

230

To dine by your side is such a heavenly way to dine

020

Morrissey himself if on it lol

000

Obviously the solution is to run more corporate Democrats and keep losing elections

000

I don't think this election supports that assertion. Nor do I think it really takes a great campaign to win in a D+7-10 environment, it just takes a not awful campaign lol

230

I think this is a misreading of the results. Narrowly winning a D+52 district suggests a lack of name recognition + the results clearly show ballot splitting by Democrats. Aka the party royally fucked up and voters didn't know who the democratic candidates were

190

Hein v. Cohen:

000

Heaven is the place - the place where the spam folder really matters

000

Guy who doesn't believe the ballroom is real

000

Can't you make any argument to criticize anything? The strength of the argument depends on how much value (in any sense) the event provides, not on whether it can be used to criticize other events

000

Nobody better than Tim Heidecker to follow Alex Jones

010

Good tsar bad boyars lol

000

You hit the nail on the head. It's only possible to determine a "major question" by reference to the status quo instead of the words of the delegation, so it necessarily leads to conservative outcomes. As a rule of construction it's basically *imaginary* legislative history