Lab-designed cells could someday be used in medicine, environmental cleanup, or manufacturing. But today's regulators aren't yet ready for the oversight challenges the coming era of synthetic cells may pose. Read more from David Gillum and Peter A. Carr. ⬇️
Профиль
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
Профиль VivelyThe best thinking on existential threats since 1945. Nuclear risk, climate change, and disruptive technologies. We set the #DoomsdayClock. thebulletin.org
A condition that Saudi Arabia normalize relations with Israel hasn't killed the nuclear agreement—only masked the fine print, writes Sharon Squassoni. Behind official claims that uranium enrichment is off the table, the US admin's deal risks dragging Washington straight into a trap.
Last chance to read without a Bulletin magazine subscription. ⬇️
Bulletin of the Atomic ScientistsReleased in 1997, Gattaca was a box-office disappointment. But it's become one of the most influential cultural texts to explore biotechnology and its social consequences, especially in a world where CRISPR-based gene editing and consumer genomics are becoming more common, writes David A. Kirby.
Is Oppenheimer, WALL-E, The Matrix, or 28 Days Later the best doomsday movie? After a series of head-to-head matches, Bulletin readers have voted on the final four. Which will win? Comment which movie is your favorite on Instagram to be entered into a giveaway: buff.ly/HftgAvE
Climate change is physically altering the operational environment of nuclear deterrence in the Arctic, but the institutions capable of managing these risks are fragmented and frozen in place, write Nikita Gryazin @nikitagryazin.bsky.social and Iren Marinova @irenmarinova.bsky.social.
Cinema has always been fascinated by catastrophe. Films showcase the dangers of existential risks to millions — and some are even entertaining. Join the Bulletin for today's discussion on "Doomsday on Film" with @maxbrooks.bsky.social, @dandrezner.bsky.social, and @eliserowan.bsky.social.
Released in 1997, Gattaca was a box-office disappointment. But it's become one of the most influential cultural texts to explore biotechnology and its social consequences, especially in a world where CRISPR-based gene editing and consumer genomics are becoming more common, writes David A. Kirby.
Gattaca "remains relevant because it shows how easily genetic information can become a measure of human worth—and how readily that standard can harden into a discriminatory hierarchy," writes David A. Kirby.
Tomorrow, join the Bulletin for a conversation about "Doomsday on Film" with @maxbrooks.bsky.social, @dandrezner.bsky.social, and @eliserowan.bsky.social. Register for free below. ⬇️
US efforts to expand global nuclear exports threaten to spur a dangerous proliferation wave, write Logan Mintz and Matthew Sharp. To prevent the spread of weapons-usable technology, Washington must pair aggressive nuclear trade with creative fuel-sharing alternatives and tougher safeguards.
Matt Field @mattyfield.bsky.social reports that while plenty of hurdles remain for anyone hoping to use fast-improving AI to develop a bioweapon, one expert notes, 'Where we will find ourselves a year from now is likely to be, without intervention, a much more risky circumstance.'"
"AI threatens the news industry’s ability to support that kind of reportage—not just on nuclear weapons, but also on other existential risks, including artificial intelligence itself." Read more in a new essay by Atomic Reporters founder, Peter Rickwood.
The National Academy of Sciences is on Trump’s radar because they are in his way." from Benjamin Santer in a new essay on "Carnage in pursuit of power, revenge, personal financial gain, and ego."
“Organizations ranging from the United Nations, to the Pope, to a consortium of nonprofits and academics known as Stop Killer Robots, decry the use of AI in warfare, especially in the deployment of lethal autonomous weapons.” Read more in a new investigative piece ⬇️
"As nuclear power becomes a more common part of commercial and governmental space missions, the safety and security frameworks established by City Labs may matter as much as the nuclear battery itself."
Join the Bulletin on Wednesday for a discussion of "Doomsday on Film" with @maxbrooks.bsky.social @dandrezner.bsky.social and @eliserowan.bsky.social Register here: pages.thebulletin.org/2026-0729-en...
"The irony is inescapable. Months after the last nuclear arms control agreement between Russia and the United States expired, tech industry leaders are citing Cold War nuclear verification as a model for regulating the safety of artificial intelligence."
“The technologies we’re worried about reduce living people to data points," according to a statement from @stopkillerrobots.bsky.social Read more in a new investigative piece from Bernice Yeung "The rise of the military-technology complex":
“Move fast and break things is not a suitable motto for any conscientious military organization.” Read more in a new investigative piece from Bernice Yeung "The rise of the military-technology complex"