Watch the full video on YouTube: www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZGP...
Профиль
Spotlight on Corruption
Профиль VivelyShining a light on the UK's role in corruption at home and abroad https://linktr.ee/endcorruptionuk
2. ✉️ So we have joined the @cipr.co.uk , @unlockdemocracy.bsky.social, @transparencyuk.bsky.social & Action on Smoking and Health (UK) in writing to Andy Burnham, calling on him to implement the @ethicsandintegrity.bsky.social's recommendations on lobbying reform in full.
3. 🪖 So it’s essential that the PFSA continues to have a broad remit to protect the whole of public sector spending from the all too real risk of fraud, particularly as the government looks to ramp up spending on defence and infrastructure. Read more in our blog:
2. 💸 This re-organisation suggests a drive to tackle benefit fraud – which cost the public purse £6.5 billion in the 2025 financial year – but this should not lose sight of the £81 billion estimated to be lost across government each year through wider fraud and error.
6.😬 The SRA is on the hook for nearly a whopping £1 million in costs following this failure. The regulator also reportedly faces paying an additional sum of over £85k in appeal costs after a disappointing decision to drop their appeal against the Tribunal’s decision.
www.lawgazette.co.uk5.💷 Carter-Ruck have gone on the offensive at a time when the SRA is facing serious scrutiny for its high-profile failures on #SLAPPs. In one of these cases, the regulator’s case against a Carter-Ruck partner who threatened legal action on behalf of the #OneCoin crypto scam was tossed out.
4.❓ This interpretation sits at odds with the SRA’s practice of routinely examining privileged material as part of its investigations. In many cases we’ve followed, the regulator has relied on privileged material to argue that lawyers breached anti-money laundering rules or professional ethics.
3.⚖️ But the specialist libel firm & their former client are refusing to hand over key material requested by the regulator. They argue that the wording of the relevant legislation does not expressly give the SRA power to compel disclosure of legally privileged information.
2.🔦 Carter-Ruck are being investigated by the SRA after their client Amersi brought successive lawsuits against former MP Charlotte Leslie over due diligence memos she prepared about the Tory party donor - a claim struck out by the judge with strong criticism of the conduct of the litigation.
6. 😬 The SRA is on the hook for nearly a whopping £1 million in costs following this failure. The regulator also reportedly faces paying an additional sum of over £85k in appeal costs after a disappointing decision to drop their appeal against the Tribunal’s decision.
www.lawgazette.co.uk5. 💷 Carter-Ruck have gone on the offensive at a time when the SRA is facing serious scrutiny for its high-profile failures on #SLAPPs. In one of these cases, the regulator’s case against a Carter-Ruck partner who threatened legal action on behalf of the #OneCoin crypto scam was tossed out.
4.❓ This interpretation sits at odds with the SRA’s practice of routinely examining privileged material as part of its investigations. In many cases we’ve followed, the regulator has relied on privileged material to argue that lawyers breached anti-money laundering rules or professional ethics.
3. ⚖️ But the specialist libel firm & their former client are refusing to hand over key material requested by the regulator. They argue that the wording of the relevant legislation does not expressly give the SRA power to compel disclosure of legally privileged information.