This is a familiar response from the 'merit' debates in India. Arday is being made into a case against 'DEI appointments'. It isn't groupthink to point out that the two men principally involved have been accused of racism in their research. That is the agenda, plagiarism is the 'objective' cover.
James ButlerBSky reaction to the Jason Arday story puzzling to me. Yes, it's absolutely driven by the worst online racists. But the evidence of plagiarism is pretty clear, and the doctoral thesis is really ropey. That matters. What am I missing?