law professor. dad. democracy & solar power. hoops. my opinions are solely my own & not attributable to anyone else. or even to me. thoughts arise of their own volition. ssrn: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=6381985
it was funny to see how fast organizational standing went from "you have to name a member" to "you have to say there is a member"
Paul GowderYet another website with not a single member, officer, or employee listed. Just a name, attached to nothing, used as a basis to file bullshit lawsuits. www.americansforequalopportunity.org
27,087. save to pdf. shipping.
Luke Smith MorganI have labored for four hours and it is now 30,041 words
"economical," which is a less economic way of saying "economic"
Sanjay SrivastavaWhat is an extremely nerdy/obscure/specific thing you hate with a white-hot wrath?
If we don't have a scandal coming from a juror betting on kalshi about the outcome of the trial I will be extremely disappointed with you, new york
karl rove knausgårdwww.cnn.com/2026/07/31/p... Shoutout to Letitia James, the only law enforcement official in the entire country who still tries to do her job
I have labored for four hours and it is now 30,041 words
Luke Smith Morgancurrent status: 30,120 words
the most bizarre part of this case, as I've said several times, is that "8647" is, at worst, an incitement, not a threat (it does not satisfy the constitutional standard for incitements either) & so constitutional issue aside it's not even within the scope of the "threatening the president" statute
Harry LitmanComey’s first motion to dismiss argues his picture of the 8647 shells configuration are just not a true threat, so that either the allegations don’t state a crime or, alternative theory, no reasonable juror could convict. An unusual motion, but well fitting the ridiculous allegations here.