I agree the 16-19 stuff is pretty knotty, and devo could mean many different things in that space. Your example would be bad, a strategic/accountable mayoral role could simplify things a lot. Waiting for the details!
Профиль
Rob Johnson
Профиль VivelySenior analyst, Centre for Cities. All things urban economics - mainly labour markets, living standards, transport, and innovation. Fan of working with data and visualising it.
Want to keep up with the biggest reshaping of the UK state in decades? We've got a 'Devolution Hub' to keep you informed that will be regularly updating over the coming weeks and months: www.centreforcities.org/devolution/
Greater control over big transport schemes is important too, as mayors look towards delivery of new infra. This (e.g., devolved TWAOs) combined with the extra fiscal firepower suggests a whole systems approach to unlocking urban investment. Though would require changes to national infra planning too
Transport: Greater local control for rail would fill in the missing piece of truly integrated urban transport networks, expanding opportunities to >1m across the country. If GBR is shaped with this in mind (as signalled here), this could genuinely transform connectivity in our big cities:
If you were in any doubt this was a policy focused on growth:
Sam FreedmanDevolving a portion of income tax is the most pro-growth policy we've seen in years. It means mayors will be hugely incentivised to grow their local economy including allowing lots of house building and infrastructure development.
Income tax retention is huge, as it means when mayors grow their economies, they get to keep a portion of the rewards instead of it being siphoned off to Westminster. The more they focus on growth, the more they get to invest in their place. See our briefing on this from last month:
And here's a helpful explainer on the powers the new mayor will have at their disposal (published today!) www.centreforcities.org/publication/...
Here's why the election matters beyond the M60: www.centreforcities.org/blog/the-gre...
Didn't make it into this piece, but I agree! Reducing private traffic should be a key priority for GM's integrated transport strategy, as set out in this blog a couple of weeks ago (we've also got one on active travel in big cities coming out soon)
Join us in 10 minutes (!) for our primer on the the subject with the indomitable Tony Travers: 👇
With all the chat about more local powers: what is fiscal devolution and how could it be a radical reform for the shape of the UK economy? We've got a handy briefing on why it matters and the 5 tests that it must pass to be designed for fairness and growth: www.centreforcities.org/publication/...
Why do our big cities matter for regional imbalances? And what are the ingredients for their success? Our BIG CITIES OUTLOOK report sets out scale of the 9 largest places outside London and their importance for 'growth in every postcode': www.centreforcities.org/publication/...
5. Physical infrastructure matters. Housing and transport are cross cutting themes limiting young people from accessing opportunities. Our work shows this is a big city problem. Most gains to be made there.