Профиль

The cousin of glitter.

sand is cool because if you ever interact with sand not only will you get sand in places you didn't realize you could get sand, you'll get sand in places you didn't know you had at all

Van Helsing was (in Dracula adaptations) the vampire hunter. (He was in the novel as well, but there was more of a general doctor/scientist/polymath than the slayer/hunter he’s been Flanderized into.)

TIL! ‘Canola is a portmanteau (from "Canada", "Oil", and "Low Acid") developed by Canadian plant researchers in mid 1970s and grown in Canada.’

Norman, please coordinate.

#birdbot

so I just want to emphasize something here that non-media people might not pick up on: Marisa is an independent journalist and is taking on the risk of being sued by Moraff here without any institutional backing. That's admirable bravery - and also means being very, very certain of the facts.

Don’t we all! www.reddit.com/r/vintageads...

Why the hell did they charge her on federal charges??

Not to mention pipes.

I said this right from the start. Unlike you, I don’t need to lie about what people say. bsky.app/profile/ri.o...

Polls that don’t get into program specifics aren’t “in-depth” polls. They’re just more versions of “Would you like to get this benefit for free?” “Why yes I do!” polls that give no indication of what the real support would be for any actual, realistic plan.

There’s no specific cost/tradeoffs polling in there at all. Where are the questions like “What would you be willing to pay in taxes to get this program?” (list different amount and have for/against/don’t know for those amounts). Or “What waits would you be willing to accept for procedures X,Y,Z”

Whether things are rough or not his replies are set to people he follows, people who follow him, and people he mentions. He doesn’t turn replies on and off on individual posts.

So you say. Post links to these “very detailed” polls that asked questions about specific costs and tradeoffs.

Post some polls where actual, realized programs, including specific costs and tradeoffs, were polled on. “Supported Medicare For All”, in a vacuum, is meaningless.

They will when the groups against it start cranking up the ads and stuff.

“How much should taxes be raised on the middle class to pay for that candy?” “You know, the country can’t really afford that candy, now that I think about it.”

7 years of shacking up with another woman?

Not to mention that people love to say they’re for something until they see a specific proposal and the costs and tradeoffs associated with it.