“Women should be seen and not heard” vibe
RazzballDid we ever find out if the A is for Asshole?
Профиль
Ashleeee 🌊🪭
Профиль VivelyCat furniture, cool auntie, and algorithmic witch. Digital rights, and IP law. Personal account and talks about everything. I usually follow back if you reply or like my post.
Just a bigoted “biological” man inciting violence with the “protecting women” dog whistle and interfering with the cis coach’s women’s rights to play sport with trans folks.
RazzballDid we ever find out if the A is for Asshole?
btw I knew Keir Starmer was a bloody racist the moment he dismantled the non-crime hate incident despite Parliament enacting it twice.
Ashleeee 🌊🪭Keep making laws that the police refuse to enforce... while removing the non-crime hate incident regime that worked pretty well for years.
Keep making laws that the police refuse to enforce... while removing the non-crime hate incident regime that worked pretty well for years.
Petition launches to make Nazi salutes criminal offence in UKA PETITION has been launched to make the performance of Nazi salutes a criminal offence in the UK ...www.thenational.scotThe Niall Horn v Apple (UK) Ltd #disability #discrimination employment tribunal and DIY committal proceedings are quite fascinating. And he actually managed to get the required disclosure AFTER the hearing. 😮 medium.com/@edgecaseexi...
Thinking Too Different — Apple 50 Years LaterBy Niall Horn — [ PDF Archive Link] | [Mirror @ EdgeCaseExistence]medium.comLook, it is the 𝑖𝑛 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑚 argument again. “that a search only be conducted by a person of the same ‘biological sex’ as the detainee is a protection afforded to the detainee. And, it is a kind of protection which could be waived by the detainee in the appropriate circumstances.”
High Court rules strip searches don’t have to be based on ‘biological sex’ | Good Law ProjectAnti-trans activists lost twice in one day, after the High Court rejected a challenge to police guidance – Jess O’Thomson argues that the ruling raises important questions for trans human rightsgoodlawproject.orgOne of the many reasons the judicial review to block the PATHWAYS trial failed, in a digestible form. 😅
Ashleeee 🌊🪭3/ The presumption referred to in the judgment is statutory. This is very much analogous to a scenario where someone opposes planning permission, but somehow argues that the developer will regret building a house and therefore interim relief should be granted.
1/🧵 Apparently, the hate groups and conversion therapists will not appeal the PATHWAYS. I wonder if it has something to do with the point in the quoted post.
Ashleeee 🌊🪭It is implied in the claimant’s argument that the interests of third-party trans kids and their own are indistinguishable, because trans kids do not exist and everyone will soon be Keira Bell. This is perhaps too bizarre for the court to examine at length. 🤭
Absolutely, I get challenged much more often here than on any other platform from my two decades of online life.
Elizabeth TaylorAs a slight counter to some of the 'Bluesky bubble' chat I'm seeing - I actually think having a broad consensus on certain issues (bog standard social liberalism, with a wide variety of views on other areas) actually makes this place *more* intellectually vibrant in some ways
A quote taken out of context. youtu.be/SzM1hpnXux4