Профиль

Andrew Guthrie Ferguson

Профиль Vively

Law Prof. GWU, Tech & Justice. Author: “Your Data Will Be Used Against You,” “The Rise of Big Data Policing,” “Why Jury Duty Matters,” and “The Law of Law School.”

Now is the time to debate new forms of self-surveillance. Flock is just one tool of a growing surveillance architecture. As I write in “Your Data Will Be Used Against You: Policing in the Age of Self-Surveillance” these are our tax dollars being used to surveil us. www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/ne...

Fridley police detail who can access Flock Safety camera data amid concerns from residentsPolice in Fridley are restricting who can access data from Flock Safety cameras. At a packed City Council meeting on Monday, they walked through data, showing the community's network of cameras was se...www.cbsnews.com

Weird that this article does not mention that Code Four uses AI to take the video of police worn body cameras and turns them into written AI drafted reports. VLM being used to write affidavits deserves a bit of critical assessment which is lacking in this article. statescoop.com/police-ai-pl...

Police AI platform uses 'Easter eggs' to verify human review | StateScoopSeldom used words, like "axolotl," a type of salamander, are inserted in Code Four's output, ensuring that law enforcement officers carefully review AI-generated content before submitting it into evid...statescoop.com
⟳ Репост от Andrew Guthrie Ferguson

In Chatrie v. United States, the Supreme Court confirmed the Fourth Amendment is relevant to the digital age. I think it offers a reimagining that impacts all sorts of digital surveillance beyond geofence warrants. Here is an essay on what it means for the future. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

Digital Policing after <i>Chatrie</i><p><i><span>Chatrie v. United States</span></i><span> is a consequential Fourth Amendment opinion, and for Supreme Court watchers a surprising one in its scopepapers.ssrn.com

In Chatrie v. United States, the Supreme Court confirmed the Fourth Amendment is relevant to the digital age. I think it offers a reimagining that impacts all sorts of digital surveillance beyond geofence warrants. Here is an essay on what it means for the future. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

Digital Policing after <i>Chatrie</i><p><i><span>Chatrie v. United States</span></i><span> is a consequential Fourth Amendment opinion, and for Supreme Court watchers a surprising one in its scopepapers.ssrn.com

This is amazing. A single 77 guy staging a protest against Flock cameras. It reveals the depth of people’s frustration with growing networks of self surveillance. And yet reveals three deep misunderstandings of the challenges ahead. 1/5 www.cltampa.com/news/a-77-ye...

A 77-year-old Republican man is staging a solo protest against St. Pete’s Flock camerasCarl Gunn in St. Petersburg, Florida on July 25, 2026. Photo by Valerie Smith. Carl Gunn, 77, was concerned for his privacy when he spotted a camerawww.cltampa.com
Следующие публикации