Профиль

Hmm. Gonna have to give this one some thought. Essentially what you’re advocating is polluting the world’s information stream, no? Seems like the likely end to this race to the bottom is that neither LLMs *nor* humans will be able to determine which sources are real and which are suspect. 🤔

Fun fact: I’ve been using his “8647” photo in my bio for a year now and still haven’t been charged with anything. 🤷‍♂️ 2/2

Not a lawsuit. Federal criminal charges. Comey is charged with violating 18 U.S.C. § 871(a) (threatening the President) and 18 U.S.C. § 875(c) (transmitting a threat in interstate commerce). Both felonies punishable with up to 5 years in prison each. 1/2

SNL really needs to revive this bit

I thought so, too. But then I spent like ten minutes trying to find a better royalty-free, non-AI portrait of an “astronaut” looking pensively off-camera and came up empty, so…🤷‍♂️

This is not breaking news. I already know this. How do I tell BlueSky to stop showing me 15 different posts with the exact same message every fucking day.

For the uninitiated: youtu.be/axByUFSa7N8?...

It makes more sense when you see the whole photoset: www.pexels.com/collections/...

Confidently asserting two contradictory lies inside of sixty seconds when being interviewed on television is just part of his elite skill set.

Explaining the joke rarely makes it funnier, but sometimes you just gotta. Thanks for this. 🙏

Fascinating phenomenon, but well-known enough that it even shows up in Hollywood scripts. (“For All Mankind” springs to mind.) I wonder how related it is to the adjustment soldiers feel when returning home after an extended deployment in a war zone?

Please accept my apologies (both of you) if my tone reads as too aggressive, or whatever.

The original post is misinformation. You knew that, so you tried to address it through subtle questioning. That didn’t work & the ambiguity remained. My approach is just more direct than yours. Now when this shows up in someone else’s Discover feed (as it did in mine), they’ll know the truth.

Then why did you confidently post “all” as if you were? It’s actually just 8 emails and 2 documents. The point is to determine if those specific 10 artifacts, unredacted, point to a larger conspiracy of illegal redactions. Here’s a good breakdown: joycevance.substack.com/p/an-importa...

Yes, some. The judge, as I understand it, is trying to determine if a handful of documents were redacted to cover up the fact that there was an orchestrated scheme to execute an even bigger cover up. If he determines that the evidence does point in that direction, THAT’S when the real fun begins!

Far as we know, dude still owes the FBI $50K (and a Kava bag). Why is he on TV being asked about anything but that?

Thanks for the recommendation. Added to my watchlist. 👍

The closest I’ve ever been to the man was when his motorcade blocked me at a red light while he was on his way to his golf course here in LA. I proudly left my car and delivered the appropriate salute to each and every fascist in the group. 🖕😠🖕

Your description made it sound much more dramatic.

Thank you. Sounds like Apple’s concern was that DMA terms required them to implement the much more permissive Android-style PWA, allowing deep HW access, arbitrary data storage, etc. They reversed course when the EC assured them it would be sufficient to limit PWAs the more secure WebKit engine.