Профиль

www.quittingcarbonmedia.com/a-repowered-...

The 82m Enercons, entered service in 2009, using the 2005 2MW platform Link?

And having the foresight to have used ~500 metre spacing between the 50kW turbines helps too. Most other people would have used the land to install 10X turbines.

And the link?

They are old turbines, from 2010's, not new tech at all.

Also, while you can pack them that close if you like, you are certainly not going to be getting anything like a 60-1 gain, especially if the 50kW turbines also had the same extremely generous for them, 500 metre spacing, except in nameplate capacity.

Just the link please.

Oh, i see its enercons

Even at that, its 5 times the spacing required for 50kW. Would you mind sending a link to the project where you are swapping out 50kW turbines with 3MW units on a 1to1 basis? And what units, I can only see older Nordex 2.5MW with 80 m turbines.

You are putting the same number of 3MW turbines in the same footprint as 50kW turbines? It shouldn't be done because the turbines will be horribly inefficient trying to extract kinetic energy from extremely turbulent air. 3 MW turbines shoul have spacing of about 1kM, compared to ~100 m for 3kW

You can't just swap out 50 kW turbines with 3 MW one for one in the same area. There are massive gains to be got from repowering but not 60-1. For example Whitlee is Scotland will go from 500 MW/ 215 turbines to 1GW/ 124, or Löberitz Germany from 4.24 MW /turbines to 21.6 MW/ turbines

Bloody anglo-saxons

They would have to overfly Turkey or Azerbaijan.

Imagine if they tried selling less ICE and more BEV in a market where ICE sales are in terminal decline.

And to think they were planning to capture Kyiv 1597 days ago. Seems ambition has been scaled back some.

Does read a bit like chuck.

bsky.app/profile/volb...

All that extra fuel in Irkutsk had to come from somewhere.

LoL on the day he says he is not giving Ukraine the 400 mn allocated to it. This change of image is for the votes, nothing to do with helping Ukraine