Подтвердите e-mail

Для публикаций, комментариев, реакций и сообщений подтвердите адрес.

Профиль

Nika

Профиль Vively

@hedgehogsafety.bsky.social

020

@hedgehogsafety.bsky.social

050

@hedgehogsafety.bsky.social

050

@hedgehogsafety.bsky.social

080

Fahrenheit 51

010

His posts influence the markets, so he's selling early access to people who will financially benefit from it.

0111

@hedgehogsafety.bsky.social

010

Quite. SCUK's handling (or lack thereof) of A remains one of the most shocking failures of a judgment riddled with them, imo. It is very hard for me to avoid the conclusion that they ignored A simply because they had no answer for it, and they were committed to their preferred outcome regardless.

110

Given that, according to Rowling, calls to BP are recorded but callers are not immediately informed of this, and the contents of said calls may be shared with her personally so that she can publicly mock the callers to her 14 million twitter followers, that is indeed a very generous assumption.

050

@hedgehogsafety.bsky.social

010

The gall to mention "women hav[ing] the right to speak openly and honestly" in such a dishonest screed is remarkable.

130

Anyone who did have "good faith concerns" about trans inclusion in sports would simply look into it, learn that there's no actual issue there, and cease to have those concerns. The noise comes exclusively from people who haven't done that.

0261

No other choice, you'll just have to eat it raw.

040

Their lawyers must have borrowed Bailey's spaghetti briefcase.

180

I actually did read the UK court's judgment in its entirety, back when the US trial was ongoing; it was incredibly damning to Depp, and made it very clear that he did indeed abuse Heard.

090

There's just nothing serious to engage with. Having less intellectual substance than YECs is quite an achievement, but they somehow managed it nonetheless. [4/4]

0120

statistics their fellow travellers like to reference are comparing apples to oranges. The most glaringly obvious bullshit just gets passed around uncritically, even in places where you would expect them to put on their best show, like in testimony to parliament, or published articles. [3/4]

1100

intellectually dishonest groups you'll ever encounter - and even there, some of them were willing to call out bad arguments from their own side. I've yet to see a single transphobe point out that, say, sharing lists of "trans crime" is just good old-fashioned bigotry, or that the prison [2/4]

1100

Yes, this has always stood out to me too. Just today, I've seen multiple trans people delete posts because they were concerned they *might* not accurately reflect the events described. Many years ago, I spent a lot of time arguing with young-Earth creationists - pound for pound one of the most [1/4]

1100
Показать ещё